Literature DB >> 20082417

Effects of stimulation frequency and pulse duration on fatigue and metabolic cost during a single bout of neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

Julien Gondin1, Benoît Giannesini, Christophe Vilmen, Christiane Dalmasso, Yann le Fur, Patrick J Cozzone, David Bendahan.   

Abstract

We have investigated the effects of stimulation frequency and pulse duration on fatigue and energy metabolism in rat gastrocnemius muscle during a single bout of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES). Electrical pulses were delivered at 100 Hz (1-ms pulse duration) and 20 Hz (5-ms pulse duration) for the high (HF) and low (LF) frequency protocols, respectively. As a standardization procedure, the averaged stimulation intensity, the averaged total charge, the initial peak torque, the duty cycle, the contraction duration and the torque-time integral were similar in both protocols. Fatigue was assessed using two testing trains delivered at a frequency of 100 Hz and 20 Hz before and after each protocol. Metabolic changes were investigated in vivo using 31P-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P-MRS) and in vitro in freeze-clamped muscles. Both LF and HF NMES protocols induced the same decrease in testing trains and metabolic changes. We conclude that, under carefully controlled and comparable conditions, the use of low stimulation frequency and long pulse duration do not minimize the occurrence of muscle fatigue or affect the corresponding stimulation-induced metabolic changes so that this combination of stimulation parameters would not be adequate in the context of rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20082417     DOI: 10.1002/mus.21572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscle Nerve        ISSN: 0148-639X            Impact factor:   3.217


  10 in total

1.  Muscle oxygenation of vastus lateralis and medialis muscles during alternating and pulsed current electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Aldayel; Makii Muthalib; Marc Jubeau; Michael McGuigan; Kazunori Nosaka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation intensity over the tibial nerve trunk on triceps surae muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Aude-Clémence M Doix; Boris Matkowski; Alain Martin; Karin Roeleveld; Serge S Colson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Dance combined with magnetic pulse stimulates the ability of walk and balance in elder people.

Authors:  Tao Lu; Qing-Hua Song; Rong-Mei Xu; Yan-Hua Guo; Feng Wang; Jian-Ping Hu; Yi Wang; Li-Yan Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

Review 4.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation: implications of the electrically evoked sensory volley.

Authors:  A J Bergquist; J M Clair; O Lagerquist; C S Mang; Y Okuma; D F Collins
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Effects of an Impulse Frequency Dependent 10-Week Whole-body Electromyostimulation Training Program on Specific Sport Performance Parameters.

Authors:  Joshua Berger; Oliver Ludwig; Stephan Becker; Marco Backfisch; Wolfgang Kemmler; Michael Fröhlich
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Is Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Effective in Treating Severe Dysarthria: Insights from a Case Study.

Authors:  Matteo Berenati; Antonino Naro; Cinzia Calabrò; Michele Torrisi; Salvatore Massimiliano Cardali; Rocco Salvatore Calabrò
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2021 Oct-Dec

7.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation prevents skeletal muscle dysfunction in adjuvant-induced arthritis rat.

Authors:  Koichi Himori; Daisuke Tatebayashi; Keita Kanzaki; Masanobu Wada; Håkan Westerblad; Johanna T Lanner; Takashi Yamada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effect of tendon vibration during wide-pulse neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on muscle force production in people with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Authors:  Vanesa Bochkezanian; Robert U Newton; Gabriel S Trajano; Amilton Vieira; Timothy S Pulverenti; Anthony J Blazevich
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 9.  Can the Use of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Be Improved to Optimize Quadriceps Strengthening?

Authors:  Neal R Glaviano; Susan Saliba
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.843

10.  Enhancing Adaptations to Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Training Interventions.

Authors:  Anthony J Blazevich; David F Collins; Guillaume Y Millet; Marco A Vaz; Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 6.230

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.