Literature DB >> 20082330

Group-level variations in motor representation areas of thenar and anterior tibial muscles: Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study.

Eini Niskanen1, Petro Julkunen, Laura Säisänen, Ritva Vanninen, Pasi Karjalainen, Mervi Könönen.   

Abstract

Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used to stimulate functional cortical areas at precise anatomical location to induce measurable responses. The stimulation has commonly been focused on anatomically predefined motor areas: TMS of that area elicits a measurable muscle response, the motor evoked potential. In clinical pathologies, however, the well-known homunculus somatotopy theory may not be straightforward, and the representation area of the muscle is not fixed. Traditionally, the anatomical locations of TMS stimulations have not been reported at the group level in standard space. This study describes a methodology for group-level analysis by investigating the normal representation areas of thenar and anterior tibial muscle in the primary motor cortex. The optimal representation area for these muscles was mapped in 59 healthy right-handed subjects using navigated TMS. The coordinates of the optimal stimulation sites were then normalized into standard space to determine the representation areas of these muscles at the group-level in healthy subjects. Furthermore, 95% confidence interval ellipsoids were fitted into the optimal stimulation site clusters to define the variation between subjects in optimal stimulation sites. The variation was found to be highest in the anteroposterior direction along the superior margin of the precentral gyrus. These results provide important normative information for clinical studies assessing changes in the functional cortical areas because of plasticity of the brain. Furthermore, it is proposed that the presented methodology to study TMS locations at the group level on standard space will be a suitable tool for research purposes in population studies. 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20082330      PMCID: PMC6870707          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  44 in total

Review 1.  Modeling of the stimulating field generation in TMS.

Authors:  J Ruohonen; R J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl       Date:  1999

2.  Localization of the motor hand area using transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  B Boroojerdi; H Foltys; T Krings; U Spetzger; A Thron; R Töpper
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  The navigation of transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  U Herwig; C Schönfeldt-Lecuona; A P Wunderlich; C von Tiesenhausen; A Thielscher; H Walter; M Spitzer
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2001-11-30       Impact factor: 3.222

4.  The precision of anatomical normalization in the medial temporal lobe using spatial basis functions.

Authors:  C H Salmond; J Ashburner; F Vargha-Khadem; A Connelly; D G Gadian; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Magnetoencephalography indicates finger motor somatotopy.

Authors:  Roland Beisteiner; Andreas Gartus; Marcus Erdler; Dagmar Mayer; Rupert Lanzenberger; Lüder Deecke
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  A TMS coil positioning/holding system for MR image-guided TMS interleaved with fMRI.

Authors:  Daryl E Bohning; S Denslow; P A Bohning; J A Walker; M S George
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Using the international 10-20 EEG system for positioning of transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Uwe Herwig; Peyman Satrapi; Carlos Schönfeldt-Lecuona
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and computed electric field strength reduce stimulator-dependent differences in the motor threshold.

Authors:  Nils Danner; Petro Julkunen; Mervi Könönen; Laura Säisänen; Jouko Nurkkala; Jari Karhu
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 9.  The musician's brain as a model of neuroplasticity.

Authors:  Thomas F Münte; Eckart Altenmüller; Lutz Jäncke
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Individual variation in human motor-sensory (rolandic) cortex.

Authors:  Donald F Farrell; Nicole Burbank; Ettore Lettich; George A Ojemann
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.177

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Motor Cortex and Motor Cortical Interhemispheric Communication in Walking After Stroke: The Roles of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Animal Models in Our Current and Future Understanding.

Authors:  Charalambos C Charalambous; Mark G Bowden; DeAnna L Adkins
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  Exploring the impact of visual and movement based priming on a motor intervention in the acute phase post-stroke in persons with severe hemiparesis of the upper extremity.

Authors:  Jigna Patel; Qinyin Qiu; Mathew Yarossi; Alma Merians; Supriya Massood; Eugene Tunik; Sergei Adamovich; Gerard Fluet
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.033

3.  Characterizing differential poststroke corticomotor drive to the dorsi- and plantarflexor muscles during resting and volitional muscle activation.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Palmer; Ryan Zarzycki; Susanne M Morton; Trisha M Kesar; Stuart A Binder-Macleod
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Maturation changes the excitability and effective connectivity of the frontal lobe: A developmental TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Sara Määttä; Laura Säisänen; Elisa Kallioniemi; Timo A Lakka; Niina Lintu; Eero A Haapala; Päivi Koskenkorva; Eini Niskanen; Florinda Ferreri; Mervi Könönen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Bilateral Assessment of the Corticospinal Pathways of the Ankle Muscles Using Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Charalambos C Charalambous; Jing Nong Liang; Steve A Kautz; Mark S George; Mark G Bowden
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Sensorimotor cortex reorganization in subacute and chronic stroke: A neuronavigated TMS study.

Authors:  Mathew Yarossi; Sergei Adamovich; Eugene Tunik
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2014

7.  Motor skill changes and neurophysiologic adaptation to recovery-oriented virtual rehabilitation of hand function in a person with subacute stroke: a case study.

Authors:  Gerard G Fluet; Jigna Patel; Qinyin Qiu; Matthew Yarossi; Supriya Massood; Sergei V Adamovich; Eugene Tunik; Alma S Merians
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.033

8.  Impact of non-brain anatomy and coil orientation on inter- and intra-subject variability in TMS at midline.

Authors:  Erik G Lee; Priyam Rastogi; Ravi L Hadimani; David C Jiles; Joan A Camprodon
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Spatial localization and distribution of the TMS-related 'hotspot' of the tibialis anterior muscle representation in the healthy and post-stroke motor cortex.

Authors:  Anjali Sivaramakrishnan; Lenore Tahara-Eckl; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Locating primary somatosensory cortex in human brain stimulation studies: experimental evidence.

Authors:  Nicholas Paul Holmes; Luigi Tamè; Paisley Beeching; Mary Medford; Mariyana Rakova; Alexander Stuart; Silvia Zeni
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.