Literature DB >> 20082201

Comparison between two surgical techniques for lower eyelid rejuvenation: safety analysis and outcomes.

Giovanni André Pires Viana1, Midori Hentona Osaki, Mauro Nishi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze prospectively 50 patients submitted to lower blepharoplasty allocated to two surgical groups at Federal University of São Paulo, between April 2005 and May 2007.
METHODS: Fifty patients were assigned for interventions into two surgical groups by using random allocation. The SG1 (control group) was composed of 25 patients who were submitted to conservatively standard fat-resection lower blepharoplasty, and routine lateral canthal support. The SG2 (experimental group) was represented by 25 patients submitted to lower blepharoplasty with periorbital fat mobilization and arcus marginalis redrape, and routine lateral canthal support. Preoperative demographic and morphological data from patient charts and standardized photographs obtained before and after surgery were evaluated by an independent observer. Surgical techniques and management of complications were determined from operative reports and clinical notes.
RESULTS: The median follow-up was 395 days (range 364 to 547 days). The mean age was 48.8 years; the population's gender was predominantly female (96%). Analysis of preoperative and postoperative photographs showed that all patients achieved significant improvement. Lateral canthal support was performed in all patients with statistically significant results.
CONCLUSION: The authors concluded that both procedures are safe and effective, with low complication rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20082201     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-009-1266-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  27 in total

1.  An algorithm of facial aging: verification of Lambros's theory by three-dimensional stereolithography, with reference to the pathogenesis of midfacial aging, scleral show, and the lateral suborbital trough deformity.

Authors:  J E Pessa
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Curve analysis of the aging orbital aperture.

Authors:  Joel E Pessa; Yuan Chen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Restricted ocular movements following lower eyelid fat repositioning.

Authors:  Robert A Goldberg; Vernon Ho Yuen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  The three periorbital hollows: a paradigm for periorbital rejuvenation.

Authors:  Robert Alan Goldberg
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 5.  A new concept in blepharoplasty.

Authors:  R de la Plaza; L de la Cruz
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 6.  Canthopexy as a routine blepharoplasty component.

Authors:  R S Flowers
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.017

7.  The role of the septal reset in creating a youthful eyelid-cheek complex in facial rejuvenation.

Authors:  Sam T Hamra
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Lower blepharoplasty with capsulopalpebral fascia hernia repair for palpebral bags: a long-term prospective study.

Authors:  Alan A Parsa; Kevin D Lye; Nathan Radcliffe; Fereydoun Don Parsa
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  The comprehensive management of chemosis following cosmetic lower blepharoplasty.

Authors:  Adam B Weinfeld; Renee Burke; Mark A Codner
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Primary transcutaneous lower blepharoplasty with routine lateral canthal support: a comprehensive 10-year review.

Authors:  Mark A Codner; James N Wolfli; Alexander Anzarut
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.