Literature DB >> 20082116

Phase I study of 17-allylamino-17 demethoxygeldanamycin, gemcitabine and/or cisplatin in patients with refractory solid tumors.

Joleen Hubbard1, Charles Erlichman, David O Toft, Rui Qin, Bridget A Stensgard, Sara Felten, Cynthia Ten Eyck, Gretchen Batzel, S Percy Ivy, Paul Haluska.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and characterize the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of 17-AAG, gemcitabine and/or cisplatin. Levels of the proteins Hsp90, Hsp70 and ILK were measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PMBC) lysates to assess the effects of 17-AAG. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Phase I dose-escalating trial using a "3 + 3" design performed in patients with advanced solid tumors. Once the MTD of gemcitabine + 17-AAG + cisplatin was determined, dose escalation of 17-AAG with constant doses of gemcitabine and cisplatin was attempted. After significant hematologic toxicity occurred, the protocol was amended to evaluate three cohorts: gemcitabine and 17-AAG; 17-AAG and cisplatin; and gemcitabine, 17-AAG and cisplatin with modified dosing.
RESULTS: The 39 patients enrolled were evaluable for toxicity and response. The MTD for cohort A was 154 mg/m(2) of 17-AAG, 750 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine, and 40 mg/m(2) of cisplatin. In cohort A, DLTs were observed at the higher dose level and included neutropenia, hyperbilirubinemia, dehydration, GGT elevation, hyponatremia, nausea, vomiting, and thrombocytopenia. The MTD for cohort C was 154 mg/m(2) of 17-AAG and 750 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine, with one DLT observed (alkaline phosphatase elevation) observed. In cohort C, DLTs of thrombocytopenia, fever and dyspnea were seen at the higher dose level. The remaining cohorts were closed to accrual due to toxicity. Six patients experienced partial responses. Mean Hsp90 levels were decreased and levels of Hsp70 were increased compared to baseline.
CONCLUSIONS: 17-AAG in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin demonstrated antitumor activity, but significant hematologic toxicities were encountered. 17-AAG combined with gemcitabine is tolerable and has demonstrated evidence of activity at the MTD. The recommended phase II dose is defined as 154 mg/m(2) of 17-AAG and 750 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine, and is currently being investigated in phase II studies in ovarian and pancreatic cancers. There is no recommended phase II dose for the cisplatin-containing combinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20082116      PMCID: PMC2908718          DOI: 10.1007/s10637-009-9381-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest New Drugs        ISSN: 0167-6997            Impact factor:   3.850


  28 in total

Review 1.  The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective.

Authors:  B B Zhou; S J Elledge
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-11-23       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Hsp90: chaperoning signal transduction.

Authors:  K Richter; J Buchner
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 3.  Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases.

Authors:  R T Abraham
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 4.  Regulation of signaling protein function and trafficking by the hsp90/hsp70-based chaperone machinery.

Authors:  William B Pratt; David O Toft
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2003-02

5.  Geldanamycin induces heat shock protein expression through activation of HSF1 in K562 erythroleukemic cells.

Authors:  H R Kim; H S Kang; H D Kim
Journal:  IUBMB Life       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.885

6.  Geldanamycin restores a defective heat shock response in vivo.

Authors:  K F Winklhofer; A Reintjes; M C Hoener; R Voellmy; J Tatzelt
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-09-26       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  A phase II trial of 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin in patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Elisabeth I Heath; David W Hillman; Ulka Vaishampayan; Shijie Sheng; Fazlul Sarkar; Felicity Harper; Melvin Gaskins; Henry C Pitot; Winston Tan; S Percy Ivy; Roberto Pili; Michael A Carducci; Charles Erlichman; Glenn Liu
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  The Hsp90 chaperone complex as a novel target for cancer therapy.

Authors:  M P Goetz; D O Toft; M M Ames; C Erlichman
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Chk1-deficient tumour cells are viable but exhibit multiple checkpoint and survival defects.

Authors:  George Zachos; Michael D Rainey; David A F Gillespie
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-02-03       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 10.  Chk1 and Cds1: linchpins of the DNA damage and replication checkpoint pathways.

Authors:  N Rhind; P Russell
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Hsp90 inhibitors and drug resistance in cancer: the potential benefits of combination therapies of Hsp90 inhibitors and other anti-cancer drugs.

Authors:  Xiangyi Lu; Li Xiao; Luan Wang; Douglas M Ruden
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 2.  Advances in the clinical development of heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitors in cancers.

Authors:  Komal Jhaveri; Tony Taldone; Shanu Modi; Gabriela Chiosis
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2011-10-29

3.  Phase I study of tanespimycin in combination with bortezomib in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

Authors:  Erin Schenk; Andrea E Wahner Hendrickson; Donald Northfelt; David O Toft; Matthew M Ames; Michael Menefee; Daniel Satele; Rui Qin; Charles Erlichman
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  Molecular mechanism of 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG)-induced AXL receptor tyrosine kinase degradation.

Authors:  Gnana Prakasam Krishnamoorthy; Teresa Guida; Luigi Alfano; Elvira Avilla; Massimo Santoro; Francesca Carlomagno; Rosa Marina Melillo
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  A phase II study of gemcitabine in combination with tanespimycin in advanced epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma.

Authors:  Andrea E Wahner Hendrickson; Ann L Oberg; Gretchen Glaser; John K Camoriano; Prema P Peethambaram; Gerardo Colon-Otero; Charles Erlichman; S Percy Ivy; Scott H Kaufmann; Larry M Karnitz; Paul Haluska
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 6.  Targeting the dynamic HSP90 complex in cancer.

Authors:  Jane Trepel; Mehdi Mollapour; Giuseppe Giaccone; Len Neckers
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 7.  The remarkable multivalency of the Hsp70 chaperones.

Authors:  Erik R P Zuiderweg; Lawrence E Hightower; Jason E Gestwicki
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 3.667

8.  The HSP90 inhibitor NVP-AUY922 inhibits growth of HER2 positive and trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Alexandra Canonici; Zulfiqar Qadir; Neil T Conlon; Denis M Collins; Neil A O'Brien; Naomi Walsh; Alex J Eustace; Norma O'Donovan; John Crown
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.850

9.  Backbone and methyl resonance assignments of the 42 kDa human Hsc70 nucleotide binding domain in the ADP state.

Authors:  Erik R P Zuiderweg; Jason E Gestwicki
Journal:  Biomol NMR Assign       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 0.746

10.  Cytoplasmic HSP90α expression is associated with perineural invasion in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Hua Jiang; Bensong Duan; Chengzhi He; Shasha Geng; Xiaoying Shen; Hongmei Zhu; Haihui Sheng; Changqing Yang; Hengjun Gao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.