Literature DB >> 2008174

Pencil-beam redefinition algorithm for electron dose distributions.

A S Shiu1, K R Hogstrom.   

Abstract

A pencil-beam redefinition algorithm has been developed for the calculation of electron-beam dose distributions on a three-dimensional grid utilizing 3-D inhomogeneity correction. The concept of redefinition was first used for both fixed and arced electron beams by Hogstrom et al. but was limited to a single redefinition. The success of those works stimulated the development of the pencil-beam redefinition algorithm, the aim of which is to solve the dosimetry problems presented by deep inhomogeneities through development of a model that redefines the pencil beams continuously with depth. This type of algorithm was developed independently by Storchi and Huizenga who termed it the "moments method." Such a pencil beam within the patient is characterized by a complex angular distribution, which is approximated by a Gaussian distribution having the same first three moments as the actual distribution. Three physical quantities required for dose calculation and subsequent radiation transport--namely planar fluence, mean direction, and root-mean-square spread about the mean direction--are obtained from these moments. The primary difference between the moments method and the redefinition algorithm is that the latter subdivides the pencil beams into multiple energy bins. The algorithm then becomes a macroscopic method for transporting the complete phase space of the beam and allows the calculation of physical quantities such as fluence, dose, and energy distribution. Comparison of calculated dose distributions with measured dose distributions for a homogeneous water phantom, and for phantoms with inhomogeneities deep relative to the surface, show agreement superior to that achieved with the pencil-beam algorithm of Hogstrom et al. in the penumbral region and beneath the edges of air and bone inhomogeneities. The accuracy of the redefinition algorithm is within 4% and appears sufficient for clinical use, and the algorithm is structured for further expansion of the physical model if required for site-specific treatment planning problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2008174     DOI: 10.1118/1.596697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  10 in total

1.  Preliminary comparison of helical tomotherapy and mixed beams of unmodulated electrons and intensity modulated radiation therapy for treating superficial cancers of the parotid gland and nasal cavity.

Authors:  Olivier Blasi; Jonas D Fontenot; Robert S Fields; John P Gibbons; Kenneth R Hogstrom
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 3.481

2.  Measurement and modeling of out-of-field doses from various advanced post-mastectomy radiotherapy techniques.

Authors:  Jihyung Yoon; David Heins; Xiaodong Zhao; Mary Sanders; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Site-specific range uncertainties caused by dose calculation algorithms for proton therapy.

Authors:  J Schuemann; S Dowdell; C Grassberger; C H Min; H Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Evaluation of a mixed beam therapy for postmastectomy breast cancer patients: Bolus electron conformal therapy combined with intensity modulated photon radiotherapy and volumetric modulated photon arc therapy.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; David Heins; Mary Sanders; Beibei Guo; Kenneth Hogstrom
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-05-27       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Review of fast monte carlo codes for dose calculation in radiation therapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Keyvan Jabbari
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2011-01

6.  Clinical implementation of an electron monitor unit dosimetry system based on task group 71 report and a commercial calculation program.

Authors:  Huijun Xu; Mariana Guerrero; Shifeng Chen; Xiaocheng Yang; Karl Prado; Colleen Schinkel
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

7.  Planning and delivery of intensity modulated bolus electron conformal therapy.

Authors:  Elizabeth N Hilliard; Robert L Carver; Erin L Chambers; James A Kavanaugh; Kevin J Erhart; Andrew S McGuffey; Kenneth R Hogstrom
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Quantitative evaluation of dosimetric uncertainties in electron therapy by measurement and calculation using the electron Monte Carlo dose algorithm in the Eclipse treatment planning system.

Authors:  Imad Ali; Nesreen Alsbou; Salahuddin Ahmad
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Calculating percent depth dose with the electron pencil-beam redefinition algorithm.

Authors:  Michael J Price; Kenneth R Hogstrom; John A Antolak; R Allen White; Charles D Bloch; Robert A Boyd
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Useful island block geometries of a passive intensity modulator used for intensity-modulated bolus electron conformal therapy.

Authors:  Erin L Chambers; Robert L Carver; Kenneth R Hogstrom
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.102

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.