BACKGROUND: Although weight loss reduces risk for comorbid diseases, many observational studies suggest that weight loss is associated with increased mortality risk, leading to reluctance by clinicians to consider weight reduction as a strategy to maintain health and independence in older adults. However, whether the observed weight loss is intentional is difficult to determine and may not accurately represent the mortality risk associated with intentional weight reduction. Data from the Arthritis, Diet, and Activity Promotion Trial (ADAPT) were used to determine whether randomization to a weight reduction program was associated with total mortality in overweight/obese older adults. METHODS:ADAPT (n = 318; mean age 69 +/- 6 years, body mass index 34 +/- 5 kg/m2, 72% female) assessed the influence of weight loss (achieved through dietary counseling and lifestyle modification) and/or exercise on function in overweight/obese older adults with knee osteoarthritis. ADAPT ended in December 1999. Participant vital was ascertained status through December 2006 using the National Death and Social Security Indexes. RESULTS: The mortality rate for those randomized to the 18-month weight loss intervention (n = 159, mean weight loss = -4.8 kg, 15 deaths) was lower than that for those not randomized to the weight loss intervention (n = 159, mean weight loss = -1.4 kg, 30 deaths; hazard rate ratio = 0.5, 95% confidence interval 0.3-1.0). Results were not appreciably changed when analyses were stratified by age, gender, baseline weight status, or magnitude of weight loss. CONCLUSIONS: In older adults, intentional weight loss was not associated with increased total mortality and may reduce mortality risk. Observational studies of weight loss, especially when intentionality cannot be rigorously established, may be misleading with respect to the effect of weight loss on mortality.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Although weight loss reduces risk for comorbid diseases, many observational studies suggest that weight loss is associated with increased mortality risk, leading to reluctance by clinicians to consider weight reduction as a strategy to maintain health and independence in older adults. However, whether the observed weight loss is intentional is difficult to determine and may not accurately represent the mortality risk associated with intentional weight reduction. Data from the Arthritis, Diet, and Activity Promotion Trial (ADAPT) were used to determine whether randomization to a weight reduction program was associated with total mortality in overweight/obese older adults. METHODS: ADAPT (n = 318; mean age 69 +/- 6 years, body mass index 34 +/- 5 kg/m2, 72% female) assessed the influence of weight loss (achieved through dietary counseling and lifestyle modification) and/or exercise on function in overweight/obese older adults with knee osteoarthritis. ADAPT ended in December 1999. Participant vital was ascertained status through December 2006 using the National Death and Social Security Indexes. RESULTS: The mortality rate for those randomized to the 18-month weight loss intervention (n = 159, mean weight loss = -4.8 kg, 15 deaths) was lower than that for those not randomized to the weight loss intervention (n = 159, mean weight loss = -1.4 kg, 30 deaths; hazard rate ratio = 0.5, 95% confidence interval 0.3-1.0). Results were not appreciably changed when analyses were stratified by age, gender, baseline weight status, or magnitude of weight loss. CONCLUSIONS: In older adults, intentional weight loss was not associated with increased total mortality and may reduce mortality risk. Observational studies of weight loss, especially when intentionality cannot be rigorously established, may be misleading with respect to the effect of weight loss on mortality.
Authors: Stephen P Messier; Richard F Loeser; Gary D Miller; Timothy M Morgan; W Jack Rejeski; Mary Ann Sevick; Walter H Ettinger; Marco Pahor; Jeff D Williamson Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2004-05
Authors: Xavier Pi-Sunyer; George Blackburn; Frederick L Brancati; George A Bray; Renee Bright; Jeanne M Clark; Jeffrey M Curtis; Mark A Espeland; John P Foreyt; Kathryn Graves; Steven M Haffner; Barbara Harrison; James O Hill; Edward S Horton; John Jakicic; Robert W Jeffery; Karen C Johnson; Steven Kahn; David E Kelley; Abbas E Kitabchi; William C Knowler; Cora E Lewis; Barbara J Maschak-Carey; Brenda Montgomery; David M Nathan; Jennifer Patricio; Anne Peters; J Bruce Redmon; Rebecca S Reeves; Donna H Ryan; Monika Safford; Brent Van Dorsten; Thomas A Wadden; Lynne Wagenknecht; Jacqueline Wesche-Thobaben; Rena R Wing; Susan Z Yanovski Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-03-15 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Christine G Lee; Edward J Boyko; Carrie M Nielson; Marcia L Stefanick; Douglas C Bauer; Andrew R Hoffman; Thuy-Tien L Dam; Jodi A Lapidus; Peggy Mannen Cawthon; Kristine E Ensrud; Eric S Orwoll Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2011-02-02 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jerome L Fleg; Daniel E Forman; Kathy Berra; Vera Bittner; James A Blumenthal; Michael A Chen; Susan Cheng; Dalane W Kitzman; Mathew S Maurer; Michael W Rich; Win-Kuang Shen; Mark A Williams; Susan J Zieman Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-10-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kristen M Beavers; Mary F Lyles; Cralen C Davis; Xuewen Wang; Daniel P Beavers; Barbara J Nicklas Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2011-07-27 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Christina C Wee; Karen W Huskey; Long H Ngo; Angela Fowler-Brown; Suzanne G Leveille; Murray A Mittlemen; Ellen P McCarthy Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-05-17 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Dennis T Villareal; Suresh Chode; Nehu Parimi; David R Sinacore; Tiffany Hilton; Reina Armamento-Villareal; Nicola Napoli; Clifford Qualls; Krupa Shah Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-03-31 Impact factor: 91.245