Literature DB >> 20080724

Activation of articulatory information in speech perception.

Ivan Yuen1, Matthew H Davis, Marc Brysbaert, Kathleen Rastle.   

Abstract

Emerging neurophysiologic evidence indicates that motor systems are activated during the perception of speech, but whether this activity reflects basic processes underlying speech perception remains a matter of considerable debate. Our contribution to this debate is to report direct behavioral evidence that specific articulatory commands are activated automatically and involuntarily during speech perception. We used electropalatography to measure whether motor information activated from spoken distractors would yield specific distortions on the articulation of printed target syllables. Participants produced target syllables beginning with /k/ or /s/ while listening to the same syllables or to incongruent rhyming syllables beginning with /t/. Tongue-palate contact for target productions was measured during the articulatory closure of /k/ and during the frication of /s/. Results revealed "traces" of the incongruent distractors on target productions, with the incongruent /t/-initial distractors inducing greater alveolar contact in the articulation of /k/ and /s/ than the congruent distractors. Two further experiments established that (i) the nature of this interference effect is dependent specifically on the articulatory properties of the spoken distractors; and (ii) this interference effect is unique to spoken distractors and does not arise when distractors are presented in printed form. Results are discussed in terms of a broader emerging framework concerning the relationship between perception and action, whereby the perception of action entails activation of the motor system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20080724      PMCID: PMC2818927          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0904774107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  28 in total

1.  DMDX: a windows display program with millisecond accuracy.

Authors:  Kenneth I Forster; Jonathan C Forster
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2003-02

2.  Semantics affect the planning but not control of grasping.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok; David Poeppel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004 May-Jun

4.  Tongue kinematics during utterances elicited with the SLIP technique.

Authors:  Marianne Pouplier
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.500

5.  The essential role of premotor cortex in speech perception.

Authors:  Ingo G Meister; Stephen M Wilson; Choi Deblieck; Allan D Wu; Marco Iacoboni
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

7.  Grasping a fruit: selection for action.

Authors:  U Castiello
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The motor theory of speech perception revised.

Authors:  A M Liberman; I G Mattingly
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-10

Review 9.  The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception.

Authors:  Sophie K Scott; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 13.837

10.  Reflections on mirror neurons and speech perception.

Authors:  Andrew J Lotto; Gregory S Hickok; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  21 in total

1.  Speech sounds alter facial skin sensation.

Authors:  Takayuki Ito; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Mapping of heard speech into articulation information and speech acquisition.

Authors:  John R Skoyles
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Are articulatory commands automatically and involuntarily activated during speech perception?

Authors:  C McGettigan; Z K Agnew; S K Scott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in aphasia: evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; Eiling Yee; Sheila E Blumstein; James S Magnuson
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Evidence against interactive effects on articulation in Javanese verb paradigms.

Authors:  Scott Seyfarth; Jozina Vander Klok; Marc Garellek
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

6.  Perseveration effects in reaching and grasping rely on motor priming and not perception.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Variation in the speech signal as a window into the cognitive architecture of language production.

Authors:  Audrey Bürki
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

8.  Interaction and representational integration: evidence from speech errors.

Authors:  Matthew Goldrick; H Ross Baker; Amanda Murphy; Melissa Baese-Berk
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-06-12

9.  Parsing the phonological loop: activation timing in the dorsal speech stream determines accuracy in speech reproduction.

Authors:  Alexander B Herman; John F Houde; Sophia Vinogradov; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Perceiving while producing: Modeling the dynamics of phonological planning.

Authors:  Kevin D Roon; Adamantios I Gafos
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.