Literature DB >> 20080519

Updated parental viewpoints on male neonatal circumcision in the United States.

Marvin L Wang1, Eric A Macklin, Erin Tracy, Hiyam Nadel, Elizabeth A Catlin.   

Abstract

Through a questionnaire, the authors sought to elicit information about initial attitudes concerning circumcision after reading a summary of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Policy Statement and, again, after reading a description of recent HIV/HPV studies. Predictors of increased support for circumcision included having a prior circumcised boy and being US born. Predictors of decreased support included being of Hispanic ethnicity and believing that the uncircumcised penis was more culturally normal. After reading the AAP statement, 86% of respondents remained favorable of elective circumcision, whereas 13% viewed it less favorably. After reading the passage about the HIV/HPV studies, the majority maintained their initial level of support. Certain characteristics were associated with an individual's desire to perform circumcision on his/her infant. Despite a slight decrease in support to perform circumcision after reading the AAP policy summary, respondents' initial attitudes toward circumcision were unchanged after subsequent review of recent HIV/HPV research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20080519     DOI: 10.1177/0009922809346569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)        ISSN: 0009-9228            Impact factor:   1.168


  11 in total

1.  Male Circumcision Rates in Patients From a Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinic in Southern Florida and Acceptability of Circumcision Among Hispanics.

Authors:  Jose G Castro; Deborah L Jones; Maria R López; Stephen M Weiss
Journal:  Hisp Health Care Int       Date:  2012-12-01

2.  Acceptability of neonatal circumcision by Hispanics in southern Florida.

Authors:  J G Castro; D L Jones; M R López; K Deeb; I Barradas; S M Weiss
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.359

3.  Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (full version).

Authors:  Sumit Dave; Kourosh Afshar; Luis H Braga; Peter Anderson
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Parents' rationale for male circumcision.

Authors:  Chris Rediger; Andries J Muller
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Male circumcision performed with 8-figure non-absorbable suture technique.

Authors:  Ren Chong Xi; Yin Rui Sheng; Wang Hong Chen; Li Sheng; Ji Jing Gang; Zhou Tong; Zhang Shan; Yang Feng Shuo; Zhang Zhi Gang; Yu Guo Sheng; Xu Jun Ling; Guo Hong Ying; Liu Chun Dong; Zhu Kun Ju
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  Review: a critical evaluation of arguments opposing male circumcision for HIV prevention in developed countries.

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Robert C Bailey; Jeffrey D Klausner; Arleen Leibowitz; Richard G Wamai; Jake H Waskett; Joya Banerjee; Daniel T Halperin; Laurie Zoloth; Helen A Weiss; Catherine A Hankins
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2012-03-28

7.  Decision-Making Regarding Newborn Circumcision: A Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Allison M Morgan; Yue-Yung Hu; Andrea Benin; Gina M Lockwood
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-10-28

8.  Shared Decision Making for Routine Infant Circumcision: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Teri M Mitchell; Claudia Beal
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2015

Review 9.  A 'snip' in time: what is the best age to circumcise?

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Jake H Waskett; Joya Banerjee; Richard G Wamai; Aaron A R Tobian; Ronald H Gray; Stefan A Bailis; Robert C Bailey; Jeffrey D Klausner; Robin J Willcourt; Daniel T Halperin; Thomas E Wiswell; Adrian Mindel
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  Parental decision making in male circumcision.

Authors:  Lauren Sardi; Kathy Livingston
Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.