Literature DB >> 20080221

In situ permeability measurement of the mammalian lacunar-canalicular system.

Joseph D Gardinier1, Chris W Townend, Kei-Peng Jen, Qianhong Wu, Randall L Duncan, Liyun Wang.   

Abstract

Bone is capable of adapting its mass and structure under mechanical cues. Bone cells respond to various mechanical stimuli including substrate strain, fluid pressure, and fluid flow (shear stress) in vitro. Although tissue-level strains are well documented experimentally, microfluidic parameters around bone cells are quantified mainly through theoretical modeling. A key model parameter, the Darcy permeability of the bone lacunar-canalicular system (LCS), is difficult to measure using traditional methods due to the co-existence of the larger vascular and smaller LCS porosities. In this paper, we developed a novel method to measure the LCS permeability by rapid compaction of intact mammalian bones and recording the intramedullary pressure (IMP). Six canine metacarpals were subjected to three step compression tests with peak loads of 50, 100, or 200lbs, while the IMP was simultaneously recorded using a catheter pressure transducer. The loading ramp time was chosen to be ~2ms, which was long enough to allow pressure equilibrium to be established between the marrow cavity and the vascular pores, but short enough to observe the LCS fluid flowing into and out of the vascular pores. This loading scheme permitted us to differentiate the contribution of the two intermingled porosities to the IMP responses. The time constant of the IMP pressurization and relaxation due to the LCS was found to be 8.1+/-3.6s (n=18). The mid-shaft cortex of the metacarpals mainly consisted of osteons with an average radial thickness of 65+/-27microm, which served as the characteristic distance for the LCS fluid to relax. The LCS permeability was obtained via poroelastic analysis to be 2.8+/-1.8x10(-)(23)m(2), which was smaller than previous theoretical predictions (order of 10(-)(19) to 10(-)(22)m(2)), but within the range of previous experimentally based estimations (order of 10(-)(22) to 10(-)(25)m(2)). Our results also show that osteoblasts and osteocytes experience hydraulic pressures that differ by three orders of magnitude under physiological compressive strains. These estimates of the in vivo mechanical environments may be used to design in vitro models for elucidating the cellular and molecular mechanisms of bone adaptation and pathological bone loss. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20080221      PMCID: PMC2842454          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.01.371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  37 in total

Review 1.  Bone poroelasticity.

Authors:  S C Cowin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  From Wolff's law to the Utah paradigm: insights about bone physiology and its clinical applications.

Authors:  H M Frost
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  2001-04-01

3.  Mechanotransduction in bone: osteoblasts are more responsive to fluid forces than mechanical strain.

Authors:  I Owan; D B Burr; C H Turner; J Qiu; Y Tu; J E Onyia; R L Duncan
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1997-09

4.  Experimental and numerical identification of cortical bone permeability.

Authors:  Etienne Malachanne; David Dureisseix; Patrick Cañadas; Franck Jourdan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Osteoblast hydraulic conductivity is regulated by calcitonin and parathyroid hormone.

Authors:  M V Hillsley; J A Frangos
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Studies of Haversian systems in man and some animals.

Authors:  J Jowsey
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1966-10       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  A model for the excitation of osteocytes by mechanical loading-induced bone fluid shear stresses.

Authors:  S Weinbaum; S C Cowin; Y Zeng
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Microelectrode studies of stress-generated potentials in four-point bending of bone.

Authors:  W Starkebaum; S R Pollack; E Korostoff
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1979-09

9.  The pathway of bone fluid flow as defined by in vivo intramedullary pressure and streaming potential measurements.

Authors:  Yi-Xian Qin; Wei Lin; Clinton Rubin
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  A comparative analysis of streaming potentials in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  M W Otter; V R Palmieri; D D Wu; K G Seiz; L A MacGinitie; G V Cochran
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanics and mechanobiology of trabecular bone: a review.

Authors:  Ramin Oftadeh; Miguel Perez-Viloria; Juan C Villa-Camacho; Ashkan Vaziri; Ara Nazarian
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Effects of cyclic hydraulic pressure on osteocytes.

Authors:  Chao Liu; Yan Zhao; Wing-Yee Cheung; Ronak Gandhi; Liyun Wang; Lidan You
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Imaging and quantifying solute transport across periosteum: implications for muscle-bone crosstalk.

Authors:  Xiaohan Lai; Christopher Price; Xin Lucas Lu; Liyun Wang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Microstructural changes associated with osteoporosis negatively affect loading-induced fluid flow around osteocytes in cortical bone.

Authors:  Vittorio Gatti; Evan M Azoulay; Susannah P Fritton
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Hydraulic Pressure during Fluid Flow Regulates Purinergic Signaling and Cytoskeleton Organization of Osteoblasts.

Authors:  Joseph D Gardinier; Vimal Gangadharan; Liyun Wang; Randall L Duncan
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.321

6.  Dynamic permeability of the lacunar-canalicular system in human cortical bone.

Authors:  M Benalla; P E Palacio-Mancheno; S P Fritton; L Cardoso; S C Cowin
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2013-10-22

Review 7.  Advances in assessment of bone porosity, permeability and interstitial fluid flow.

Authors:  Luis Cardoso; Susannah P Fritton; Gaffar Gailani; Mohammed Benalla; Stephen C Cowin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 8.  Mechanical regulation of signaling pathways in bone.

Authors:  William R Thompson; Clinton T Rubin; Janet Rubin
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.688

9.  Skeletal adaptation to intramedullary pressure-induced interstitial fluid flow is enhanced in mice subjected to targeted osteocyte ablation.

Authors:  Ronald Y Kwon; Diana R Meays; Alexander S Meilan; Jeremiah Jones; Rosa Miramontes; Natalie Kardos; Jiunn-Chern Yeh; John A Frangos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Poromicromechanics reveals that physiological bone strains induce osteocyte-stimulating lacunar pressure.

Authors:  Stefan Scheiner; Peter Pivonka; Christian Hellmich
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2015-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.