Literature DB >> 20080000

Trauma activations and their effects on non-trauma patients.

Daniel C Smith1, Alyssa Chapital, Brooke Maile Burgess Uperesa, Erin R Smith, Catherine Ho, Alan Ahana.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trauma patients consume many resources in the emergency department (ED), but what effect their care may have upon other patients seeking care is unclear.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether the presentation of trauma patients to the ED diverts staff and resources away from non-trauma patients. We hypothesized that the admission of trauma patients to the ED would result in longer times to physician evaluation and completion of laboratory and imaging studies, as well as a longer length of stay in the ED.
METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed and compared the charts of two groups of non-trauma ED patients. The group affected by trauma arrived up to 30 min after a trauma activation. The group unaffected by trauma arrived >3 h before or 3 h after a trauma activation. Times from arrival to initial MD evaluation, X-ray study, and computed tomography (CT) scan were documented. Median times from order to completion of laboratory results and imaging were compared, as well as total ED lengths of stay (LOS).
RESULTS: Median time from arrival to MD evaluation for patients affected by a trauma activation was almost twice as long as for unaffected patients (42 vs. 23 min, respectively; p < 0.001). Times from arrival to X-ray study, CT scan order, and laboratory results were all significantly greater for patients affected by a trauma activation (p < 0.001). For patients who required admission to the hospital, the affected group had a median LOS that was increased by 16 min (224 vs. 208 min, respectively) when compared to unaffected patients (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSION: In the setting studied, the arrival of a trauma patient delayed physician evaluation and diagnostic testing. It only modestly increased the ED LOS for patients needing hospital admission.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20080000     DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  6 in total

1.  [Trauma centre admission of severely injured or critically ill patients: comparison of estimated and real arrival times].

Authors:  T Wurmb; H Jansen; M Böttcher; M Kredel; C Wunder; A Gehrmann; N Roewer; R Muellenbach
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [Optimized resource mobilization and quality of treatment of severely injured patients through a structured trauma room alarm system].

Authors:  C Spering; M Roessler; T Kurlemann; K Dresing; K M Stürmer; W Lehmann; S Sehmisch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Interfacility Transfers for Isolated Craniomaxillofacial Trauma: Perspectives of the Facial Trauma Surgeon.

Authors:  Matthew Pontell; Delora Mount; Jordan P Steinberg; Donald Mackay; Michael Golinko; Brian C Drolet
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-10-01

4.  Use of computed tomography in the setting of a tiered trauma team activation system in Australia.

Authors:  Michael M Dinh; Kai H Hsiao; Kendall J Bein; Susan Roncal; Charbel Saade; Kee Fung Chi; Richard Waugh
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2013-04-11

5.  The quality of pre-announcement communication and the accuracy of estimated arrival time in critically ill patients, a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Michelle Maris; Sivera A A Berben; Wouter Verhoef; Pierre van Grunsven; Edward C T H Tan
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2022-03-19

6.  Accuracy of Perceived Estimated Travel Time by EMS to a Trauma Center in San Bernardino County, California.

Authors:  Michael M Neeki; Colin MacNeil; Jake Toy; Fanglong Dong; Richard Vara; Joe Powell; Troy Pennington; Eugene Kwong
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-06-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.