Literature DB >> 34471476

Interfacility Transfers for Isolated Craniomaxillofacial Trauma: Perspectives of the Facial Trauma Surgeon.

Matthew Pontell1, Delora Mount2, Jordan P Steinberg3, Donald Mackay4, Michael Golinko5, Brian C Drolet6.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Secondary overtriage is a burden to the medical system. Unnecessary transfers overload trauma centers, occupy emergency transfer resources, and delay definitive patient care. Craniomaxillofacial (CMF) trauma, especially in isolation, is a frequent culprit.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the perspectives of facial trauma surgeons regarding the interfacility transfer of patients with isolated CMF trauma.
METHODS: A 31-item survey was developed using Likert-type scale and open-ended response systems. Internal consistency testing among facial trauma surgeons yielded a Cronbach's α calculation of .75. The survey was distributed anonymously to the American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, the North American Division of AO Craniomaxillofacial, and the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Statistical significance in response plurality was determined by nonoverlapping 99.9% confidence intervals (P < .001). Sum totals were reported as means with standard deviations and z scores with P values of less than .05 considered significant.
RESULTS: The survey yielded 196 responses. Seventy-seven percent of respondents did not believe that most isolated CMF transfers required emergency surgery and roughly half (49%) thought that most emergency transfers were unnecessary. Fifty-four percent of respondents agreed that most patients transferred could have been referred for outpatient management and 87% thought that transfer guidelines could help decrease unnecessary transfers. Twenty-seven percent of respondents had no pre-transfer communication with the referring facility. Perspectives on the transfer of specific fracture patterns and their presentations were also collected.
CONCLUSION: Most facial trauma surgeons in this study believe that emergent transfer for isolated CMF trauma is frequently unnecessary. Such injuries rarely require emergent surgery and can frequently be managed in the outpatient setting without activating emergency transfer services. The fracture-specific data collected are a representation of the national, multidisciplinary opinion of facial trauma surgeons and correlate with previously published data on which specific types of facial fractures are most often transferred unnecessarily. The results of this study can serve as the foundation for interfacility transfer guidelines, which may provide a valuable resource in triaging transfers and decreasing associated health-care costs.
© The Author(s) 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  facial; fracture; interfacility; isolated; secondary overtriage; transfer; unnecessary

Year:  2020        PMID: 34471476      PMCID: PMC8385630          DOI: 10.1177/1943387520962276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  50 in total

1.  2003 "clarification" of controversial EMTALA requirement for 24/7 coverage of emergency departments by on-call specialists, significant impact on trauma centers.

Authors:  Patricia Southard
Journal:  J Emerg Nurs       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Effectiveness of state trauma systems in reducing injury-related mortality: a national evaluation.

Authors:  A B Nathens; G J Jurkovich; F P Rivara; R V Maier
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2000-01

3.  Direct transport to tertiary trauma centers versus transfer from lower level facilities: impact on mortality and morbidity among patients with major trauma.

Authors:  J S Sampalis; R Denis; P Fréchette; R Brown; D Fleiszer; D Mulder
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1997-08

4.  Trauma care regionalization: a process-outcome evaluation.

Authors:  J S Sampalis; R Denis; A Lavoie; P Fréchette; S Boukas; A Nikolis; D Benoit; D Fleiszer; R Brown; M Churchill-Smith; D Mulder
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1999-04

5.  Payer status: the unspoken triage criterion.

Authors:  A B Nathens; R V Maier; M K Copass; G J Jurkovich
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2001-05

6.  Inclusive trauma systems: do they improve triage or outcomes of the severely injured?

Authors:  Garth H Utter; Ronald V Maier; Frederick P Rivara; Charles N Mock; Gregory J Jurkovich; Avery B Nathens
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2006-03

Review 7.  The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA): guidelines for compliance.

Authors:  Howard A Peth
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  Guidelines for field triage of injured patients. Recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage.

Authors:  Scott M Sasser; Richard C Hunt; Ernest E Sullivent; Marlena M Wald; Jane Mitchko; Gregory J Jurkovich; Mark C Henry; Jeffrey P Salomone; Stewart C Wang; Robert L Galli; Arthur Cooper; Lawrence H Brown; Richard W Sattin
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2009-01-23

9.  Trauma systems and the costs of trauma care.

Authors:  M G Goldfarb; G J Bazzoli; R M Coffey
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Secondary overtriage: the burden of unnecessary interfacility transfers in a rural trauma system.

Authors:  Meredith J Sorensen; Friedrich M von Recklinghausen; Gwendolyn Fulton; Kenneth W Burchard
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 14.766

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.