Literature DB >> 20079447

Cuff-type pneumatic stimulator for studying somatosensory evoked responses with fMRI.

Eugen Gallasch1, Martin Fend, Dietmar Rafolt, Raffaele Nardone, Alexander Kunz, Martin Kronbichler, Roland Beisteiner, Stefan Golaszewski.   

Abstract

For quantitative somatosensory testing in the clinical environment a microprocessor controlled MR-compatible stimulation device was developed. A main feature of this device is the use of an inflatable cuff allowing the application of defined test pressures (0-1000 mbar) to the skin surface. The cuff is pressurized by a piezoelectric proportional valve with embedded closed loop controller. The distortion of the pressure pulses, introduced by the tube between valve and cuff (tube lengths of 2 and 6 m), was evaluated. Two kinds of stimulation patterns were implemented by the microprocessor: constant frequency stimulation (selectable between 1 and 20 Hz) and stimulation with stepwise changing frequencies according to a pseudorandom sequence. Imaging tests (n=8, index finger) showed more robust responses in S1 (contralateral) and S2 (bilaterally) if evoked by the random sequence. Both, the technical tests and the imaging results, demonstrate that this new stimulation system is well suited to set a standard for somatosensory stimulation in individual longitudinal studies or multicenter comparisons. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20079447     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  5 in total

1.  Mechanical flutter stimulation induces a lasting response in the sensorimotor cortex as revealed with BOLD fMRI.

Authors:  Monica Christova; Stefan Golaszewski; Anja Ischebeck; Alexander Kunz; Dietmar Rafolt; Raffaele Nardone; Eugen Gallasch
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Outlasting corticomotor excitability changes induced by 25 Hz whole-hand mechanical stimulation.

Authors:  Monica Christova; Dietmar Rafolt; Stefan Golaszewski; Eugen Gallasch
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Between- and within-site variability of fMRI localizations.

Authors:  Jakob Rath; Moritz Wurnig; Florian Fischmeister; Nicolaus Klinger; Ilse Höllinger; Alexander Geißler; Markus Aichhorn; Thomas Foki; Martin Kronbichler; Janpeter Nickel; Christian Siedentopf; Wolfgang Staffen; Michael Verius; Stefan Golaszewski; Florian Koppelstaetter; Eduard Auff; Stephan Felber; Rüdiger J Seitz; Roland Beisteiner
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  A Simple and Compact MR-Compatible Electromagnetic Vibrotactile Stimulator.

Authors:  Xinjian Jiang; Yueqian Wang; Xiaojin Li; Liping Wang; Yong-Di Zhou; Huimin Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Stroking or Buzzing? A Comparison of Somatosensory Touch Stimuli Using 7 Tesla fMRI.

Authors:  Wietske van der Zwaag; Rolf Gruetter; Roberto Martuzzi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.