Literature DB >> 20078511

Evaluation of zeta and HA-binding methods for selection of spermatozoa with normal morphology, protamine content and DNA integrity.

S H Razavi1, M H Nasr-Esfahani, M R Deemeh, M Shayesteh, M Tavalaee.   

Abstract

Sperm selection parameters based on morphology and motility for ICSI might not be relevant to chromatin integrity. Thus sperm selection based on sperm characteristics has been suggested. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of the zeta and hyaluronic acid (HA) sperm selection procedures with neat semen, for recovering spermatozoa with normal morphology, protamine content and DNA integrity in infertile men. Semen samples from 77 infertile couples were assessed during this study. Semen analysis was carried out according to World Health Organization criteria. Protamine content, DNA integrity and sperm morphology were assessed by chromomycin A3, sperm chromatin dispersion and Papanicolaou staining respectively. The results show that both HA and zeta methods were efficient to recover spermatozoa with normal morphology and protamine content. In terms of the latter parameters, there was no superiority between the two procedures. However, in terms of DNA integrity, the zeta method was more efficient compared with the control and HA procedure and no significant difference was observed between HA and the controls. Therefore, the zeta method appears to be a suitable procedure to recover spermatozoa with normal DNA integrity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20078511     DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2009.00948.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Andrologia        ISSN: 0303-4569            Impact factor:   2.775


  21 in total

Review 1.  The great debate: varicocele treatment and impact on fertility.

Authors:  Matthew A Will; Jason Swain; Mikkel Fode; Jens Sonksen; Gregory M Christman; Dana Ohl
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Density gradient centrifugation before or after magnetic-activated cell sorting: which technique is more useful for clinical sperm selection?

Authors:  M Tavalaee; M R Deemeh; M Arbabian; M H Nasr-Esfahani
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Optimization of microelectrophoresis to select highly negatively charged sperm.

Authors:  Luke Simon; Kristin Murphy; Kenneth I Aston; Benjamin R Emery; James M Hotaling; Douglas T Carrell
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Sperm function tests in clinical practice.

Authors:  Fuat Kızılay; Barış Altay
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-12-01

5.  Evaluation of ubiquitin and annexin V in sperm population selected based on density gradient centrifugation and zeta potential (DGC-Zeta).

Authors:  M Zarei-Kheirabadi; E Shayegan Nia; M Tavalaee; M R Deemeh; M Arabi; M Forouzanfar; Gh R Javadi; M H Nasr-Esfahani
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Sperm preparation: state-of-the-art--physiological aspects and application of advanced sperm preparation methods.

Authors:  Ralf Henkel
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Sperm head vacuolization affects clinical outcome in ICSI cycle. A proposal of a cut-off value.

Authors:  Doriana Falagario; Anna Maria Brucculeri; Raffaella Depalo; Paolo Trerotoli; Ettore Cittadini; Giovanni Ruvolo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Zeta potential vs apoptotic marker: which is more suitable for ICSI sperm selection?

Authors:  A Zahedi; M Tavalaee; M R Deemeh; L Azadi; M Fazilati; M H Nasr-Esfahani
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  Genome integrity, stem cells and hyaluronan.

Authors:  Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz; Endre A Balazs
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.682

10.  Efficacy of the motile sperm organelle morphology examination (MSOME) in predicting pregnancy after intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  Livia D Akl; Joao Batista A Oliveira; Claudia G Petersen; Ana L Mauri; Liliane F I Silva; Fabiana C Massaro; Ricardo L R Baruffi; Mario Cavagna; Jose G Franco
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.