Literature DB >> 20077254

On group sequential designs comparing two binomial proportions.

James L Kepner1.   

Abstract

Discussed is the problem of sample size determination for one- and two-stage hypothesis tests comparing two binomial proportions using two independent random samples. A FORTRAN compiled search algorithm identifies exact group sequential designs that allow early stopping only for futility or only for efficacy or for either futility or efficacy. The resulting designs yield a substantial savings in terms of total sample size in many practical cases, are seen to satisfy a number of desirable properties, and are compared to other exact one- and two-stage designs and to designs derived based upon asymptotic normal theory methods.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20077254     DOI: 10.1080/10543400903280621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biopharm Stat        ISSN: 1054-3406            Impact factor:   1.051


  4 in total

1.  Advances in Statistical Approaches Oncology Drug Development.

Authors:  Anastasia Ivanova; Gary L Rosner; Olga Marchenko; Tom Parke; Inna Perevozskaya; Yanping Wang
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.778

2.  Boundary problem in Simon's two-stage clinical trial designs.

Authors:  Guogen Shan; John J Chen; Changxing Ma
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 1.051

3.  A stochastically curtailed two-arm randomised phase II trial design for binary outcomes.

Authors:  Martin Law; Michael J Grayling; Adrian P Mander
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 1.894

4.  Practical and robust test for comparing binomial proportions in the randomized phase II setting.

Authors:  Kristopher Attwood; Soyun Park; Alan D Hutson
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 1.234

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.