Literature DB >> 20075358

In-hospital complication rates after stent treatment of 388 symptomatic intracranial stenoses: results from the INTRASTENT multicentric registry.

Wiebke Kurre1, Joachim Berkefeld, Friedhelm Brassel, Roland Brüning, Bernd Eckert, Seniye Kamek, Guenther E Klein, Michael Knauth, Thomas Liebig, Jana Maskova, Dirk Mucha, Tobias Neumann-Haefelin, Sara Pilgram-Pastor, Matthias Sitzer, Michael Sonnberger, Mark Tietke, Johannes Trenkler, Bernd Turowski.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Stenting is increasingly used as an adjunct to medical therapy in symptomatic intracranial stenoses. High periprocedural adverse event rates are one of the limitations of endovascular treatment. Data from the INTRASTENT multicentric registry should demonstrate in-hospital complications at the current stage of clinical development of the stent procedure.
METHODS: Participating centers entered the records of all their consecutive intracranial stent procedures into the database. To determine the clinical outcome in the acute phase, we distinguished transient ischemic attack/nondisabling stroke (modified Rankin Scale <2), disabling stroke, death, and intracranial hemorrhage as clinical complications and analyzed whether they were associated with patient- or stenosis-related risk factors.
RESULTS: Data from 372 patients with 388 stenoses proved 4.8% disabling strokes and 2.2% deaths. Transient or minor events were detected in 5.4% of the cases. Hemorrhagic events (3.5%) occurred more frequently after treatment of middle cerebral artery stenoses (P=0.004) and were associated with significantly higher morbidity and mortality rates. Ischemic strokes by compromise of perforating branches were detected mainly in the posterior circulation. However, the overall rate of severe adverse events was not dependent from location, degree, and morphology of the stenosis or from patient's age, gender, vascular risk factors, or type of qualifying event.
CONCLUSIONS: The complication rates within the registry are within the limits of previously published data. Severe adverse events were equally distributed between potential risk groups with similar rates but different types of main complications in the anterior and posterior circulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20075358     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.568063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  19 in total

1.  Editorial - do not throw the baby out with the bathwater….

Authors:  T Krings
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  China Angioplasty and Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Severe Stenosis (CASSISS): A new, prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial in China.

Authors:  Peng Gao; Zhenwei Zhao; Daming Wang; Jian Wu; Yiling Cai; Tianxiao Li; Wei Wu; Huaizhang Shi; Weiwen He; Fengshui Zhu; Liqun Jiao; Feng Ling
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 1.610

3.  Complication rates using balloon-expandable and self-expanding stents for the treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses : analysis of the INTRASTENT multicentric registry.

Authors:  Wiebke Kurre; Friedhelm Brassel; Roland Brüning; Jan Buhk; Bernd Eckert; Susanna Horner; Michael Knauth; Thomas Liebig; Jana Maskova; Dirk Mucha; Vojtech Sychra; Matthias Sitzer; Michael Sonnberger; Marc Tietke; Johannes Trenkler; Bernd Turowski; Joachim Berkefeld
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Studies in intracranial stenting: we must not retire from the game of science.

Authors:  J Fiehler
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 5.  Intracranial stenting in atherosclerotic disease-recent results and challenges to face.

Authors:  Wiebke Kurre; René Chapot; Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont; Joachim Berkefeld
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Peri-procedural stroke or death in stenting of symptomatic severe intracranial stenosis.

Authors:  Shadi Yaghi; Pooja Khatri; Adam de Havenon; Sharon Yeatts; Andrew D Chang; Shawna Cutting; Brian Mac Grory; Tina Burton; Mahesh V Jayaraman; Ryan A McTaggart; David Fiorella; Colin Derdeyn; Osama O Zaidat; Seena Dehkharghani; Sepideh Amin-Hanjani; Karen Furie; Shyam Prahbakaran; David Liebeskind
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 5.836

Review 7.  Stenting in Intracranial Stenosis: Current Controversies and Future Directions.

Authors:  Arindam R Chatterjee; Colin P Derdeyn
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 8.  Stroke prevention: an update.

Authors:  Marie-Germaine Bousser
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 9.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Intracranial Stenoses.

Authors:  W Reith; J Berkefeld; P Dietrich; J Fiehler; O Jansen
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.649

10.  Peri-stent aneurysm formation following a stent implant for stenotic intracranial vertebral artery dissection: a technical report of two cases successfully treated with coil embolization.

Authors:  Hideki Ishimaru; Kazuaki Nakashima; Hideaki Takahata; Yohjiro Matsuoka
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.