Literature DB >> 20074736

Optimality principles for model-based prediction of human gait.

Marko Ackermann1, Antonie J van den Bogert.   

Abstract

Although humans have a large repertoire of potential movements, gait patterns tend to be stereotypical and appear to be selected according to optimality principles such as minimal energy. When applied to dynamic musculoskeletal models such optimality principles might be used to predict how a patient's gait adapts to mechanical interventions such as prosthetic devices or surgery. In this paper we study the effects of different performance criteria on predicted gait patterns using a 2D musculoskeletal model. The associated optimal control problem for a family of different cost functions was solved utilizing the direct collocation method. It was found that fatigue-like cost functions produced realistic gait, with stance phase knee flexion, as opposed to energy-related cost functions which avoided knee flexion during the stance phase. We conclude that fatigue minimization may be one of the primary optimality principles governing human gait. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20074736      PMCID: PMC2849893          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  21 in total

1.  Neuromusculoskeletal computer modeling and simulation of upright, straight-legged, bipedal locomotion of Australopithecus afarensis (A.L. 288-1).

Authors:  Akinori Nagano; Brian R Umberger; Mary W Marzke; Karin G M Gerritsen
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.868

2.  Foot and ankle forces during an automobile collision: the influence of muscles.

Authors:  E C Hardin; A Su; A J van den Bogert
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Using computed muscle control to generate forward dynamic simulations of human walking from experimental data.

Authors:  Darryl G Thelen; Frank C Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Stride lengths, speed and energy costs in walking of Australopithecus afarensis: using evolutionary robotics to predict locomotion of early human ancestors.

Authors:  William I Sellers; Gemma M Cain; Weijie Wang; Robin H Crompton
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Intrinsic muscle properties facilitate locomotor control - a computer simulation study.

Authors:  K G Gerritsen; A J van den Bogert; M Hulliger; R F Zernicke
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.422

6.  The three-dimensional determination of internal loads in the lower extremity.

Authors:  U Glitsch; W Baumann
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  A theory of metabolic costs for bipedal gaits.

Authors:  A E Minetti; R M Alexander
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1997-06-21       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  The control of shoulder muscles during goal directed movements, an inverse dynamic analysis.

Authors:  R Happee; F C Van der Helm
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Deformation characteristics of the heel region of the shod foot during a simulated heel strike: the effect of varying midsole hardness.

Authors:  P Aerts; D De Clercq
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.337

10.  A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion.

Authors:  R D Crowninshield; R A Brand
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  73 in total

1.  Evaluation of the minimum energy hypothesis and other potential optimality criteria for human running.

Authors:  Ross H Miller; Brian R Umberger; Joseph Hamill; Graham E Caldwell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Walking on a moving surface: energy-optimal walking motions on a shaky bridge and a shaking treadmill can reduce energy costs below normal.

Authors:  Varun Joshi; Manoj Srinivasan
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 2.704

3.  Is my model good enough? Best practices for verification and validation of musculoskeletal models and simulations of movement.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hicks; Thomas K Uchida; Ajay Seth; Apoorva Rajagopal; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Metabolic cost underlies task-dependent variations in motor unit recruitment.

Authors:  Adrian K M Lai; Andrew A Biewener; James M Wakeling
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Predictive simulation of gait at low gravity reveals skipping as the preferred locomotion strategy.

Authors:  Marko Ackermann; Antonie J van den Bogert
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Control of position and movement is simplified by combined muscle spindle and Golgi tendon organ feedback.

Authors:  Dinant A Kistemaker; Arthur J Knoek Van Soest; Jeremy D Wong; Isaac Kurtzer; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Flexing computational muscle: modeling and simulation of musculotendon dynamics.

Authors:  Matthew Millard; Thomas Uchida; Ajay Seth; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  The cost of moving optimally: kinematic path selection.

Authors:  Dinant A Kistemaker; Jeremy D Wong; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Electromyography-Driven Forward Dynamics Simulation to Estimate In Vivo Joint Contact Forces During Normal, Smooth, and Bouncy Gaits.

Authors:  Swithin S Razu; Trent M Guess
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

10.  Optimizing Locomotion Controllers Using Biologically-Based Actuators and Objectives.

Authors:  Jack M Wang; Samuel R Hamner; Scott L Delp; Vladlen Koltun
Journal:  ACM Trans Graph       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.414

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.