Literature DB >> 20074324

A randomised controlled trial of total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of young patients with arthritis of the hip joint.

Juul Achten1, Nick R Parsons, Richard P Edlin, Damian R Griffin, Matthew L Costa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hip replacement (arthroplasty) surgery is a highly successful treatment for patients with severe symptomatic arthritis of the hip joint. For older patients, several designs of Total Hip Arthroplasty have shown excellent results in terms of both function and value for money. However, in younger more active patients, there is approximately a 50% failure rate at 25 years for traditional implants. Hip resurfacing is a relatively new arthroplasty technique. In a recent review of the literature on resurfacing arthroplasty it was concluded that the short-term functional results appear promising but some potential early disadvantages were identified, including the risk of femoral neck fracture and collapse of the head of the femur. The aim of the current study is to assess whether there is a difference in functional hip scores at one year post-operation between Total Hip Arthroplasty and Resurfacing Arthroplasty. Secondary aims include assessment of complication rates for both procedures as well cost effectiveness. METHODS/
DESIGN: All patients medically fit for surgery and deemed suitable for a resurfacing arthroplasty are eligible to take part in this study. A randomisation sequence will be produced and administered independently. After consenting, all patients will be clinically reviewed and hip function, quality of life and physical activity level will be assessed through questionnaires. The allocated surgery will then be performed with the preferred technique of the surgeon. Six weeks post-operation hip function will be assessed and complications recorded. Three, six and 12 months post-operation hip function, quality of life and physical activity level will be assessed. Additional information about patients' out-of-pocket expenses will also be collected. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN33354155. UKCLRN portfolio ID 4093.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20074324      PMCID: PMC2826290          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  17 in total

1.  Charnley low-frictional torque arthroplasty of the hip. 20-to-30 year results.

Authors:  B M Wroblewski; P A Fleming; P D Siney
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-05

2.  Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J M Loughead; D Chesney; J P Holland; A W McCaskie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-02

3.  Health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasties--a comparison between the Harris hip score and the Oxford hip score.

Authors:  Yegappan Kalairajah; Koldo Azurza; Christopher Hulme; Sean Molloy; Khalid J Drabu
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Self-reports of health-care utilization: diary or questionnaire?

Authors:  Mandy van den Brink; Wilbert B van den Hout; Anne M Stiggelbout; Hein Putter; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Job Kievit
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total hip replacement.

Authors:  P-A Vendittoli; M Lavigne; J Girard; A G Roy
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-08

6.  The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores.

Authors:  D W Murray; R Fitzpatrick; K Rogers; H Pandit; D J Beard; A J Carr; J Dawson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-08

7.  Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing.

Authors:  T C B Pollard; R P Baker; S J Eastaugh-Waring; G C Bannister
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-05

8.  The optimal metal-metal arthroplasty is still a total hip arthroplasty: in the affirmative.

Authors:  John M Cuckler
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compares favorably with THA at 2 years followup.

Authors:  Thomas Parker Vail; Curtis A Mina; Jeffrey D Yergler; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  The Otto Aufranc Award. Highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: randomized evaluation of penetration rate in cemented and uncemented sockets using radiostereometric analysis.

Authors:  Georgios Digas; Johan Kärrholm; Jonas Thanner; Henrik Malchau; Peter Herberts
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  17 in total

1.  Associations between pre-operative radiographic osteoarthritis severity and pain and function after total hip replacement : Radiographic OA severity predicts function after THR.

Authors:  Michelle M Dowsey; Mandana Nikpour; Paul Dieppe; Peter F M Choong
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Short-term outcomes vary by surgical approach in total hip arthroplasty: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aaron Gazendam; Anthony Bozzo; Seper Ekhtiari; Colin Kruse; Nancy Hiasat; Daniel Tushinski; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 2.928

3.  Measurement properties of the Disability Rating Index in patients undergoing hip replacement.

Authors:  Helen Parsons; Julie Bruce; Juul Achten; Matthew L Costa; Nicholas R Parsons
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 7.580

4.  The outcomes of hip resurfacing compared to standard primary total hip arthroplasty in Men.

Authors:  Kimona Issa; Amanda Palich; Tiffany Tatevossian; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Qais Naziri; Michael A Mont
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Clinical and functional outcomes of the PCCP study: a multi-center prospective study in Italy.

Authors:  G Antonini; R Giancola; D Berruti; E Blanchietti; P Pecchia; V Francione; P Greco; T C Russo; L Pietrogrande
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2013-03-31

Review 6.  The clinical and radiological outcomes of hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Rachel Nichols; Simon T Donell; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of patients with arthritis of the hip joint: single centre, parallel group, assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Matthew L Costa; Juul Achten; Nicholas R Parsons; Richard P Edlin; Pedro Foguet; Udai Prakash; Damian R Griffin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-04-19

8.  STRENGTHENING THE GLUTEUS MAXIMUS IN SUBJECTS WITH SACROILIAC DYSFUNCTION.

Authors:  Marco Aurélio N Added; Diego G de Freitas; Karina T Kasawara; Robroy L Martin; Thiago Y Fukuda
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-02

9.  A case-control study of elective hip surgery among HIV-infected patients: exposure to systemic glucocorticoids significantly increases the risk.

Authors:  E Kerr; A Middleton; D Churchill; I Reading; K Walker-Bone
Journal:  HIV Med       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.180

10.  Cost-effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty: economic evaluation alongside a clinical trial.

Authors:  Richard Edlin; Sandy Tubeuf; Juul Achten; Nicholas Parsons; Matthew Costa
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.