Literature DB >> 20074246

Microbial leakage through the implant-abutment interface of Morse taper implants in vitro.

João Pedro Aloise1, Ricardo Curcio, Marcia Zorello Laporta, Liliane Rossi, Adriana Madeira Alvares da Silva, Abrão Rapoport.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine and compare the frequency of bacterial leakage of Streptococcus sanguinis biotype II along the implant-abutment interface between two systems of morse taper dental implants. Different methods of activation of the taper abutments were used: tapped-in (Bicon) and screwed-in (Ankylos).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty sterile assemblies were used and attached, 10 Bicon and 10 Ankylos implants, according to manufacturers' specifications. They were then totally immersed within 20 test tubes containing a sterile nutrient solution brain-heart infusion (BHI). The internal part of the 20 implants was previously inoculated with 0.1 microl of S. sanguinis II (ATCC 10557) and then connected to the respective abutments. The assemblies were incubated under anaerobic conditions for 14 days in an autoclave at 37 degrees C. They were monitored daily for solution cloudiness resultant from microbial leakage on the interface of the assemblies. For statistical analysis, the Fisher test was applied and significance was assigned at the 5% level.
RESULTS: There was solution cloudiness, indicating the finding of bacterial growth inside two Bicon assemblies and two Ankylos assemblies 48 h after incubation. Microbial leakage was further substantiated by testing the suspension for the presence of Streptococcus sp. None of the sterility controls were contaminated. The frequency of bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface, with the two different morse taper implant systems, was 20% of the assemblies of each system. There were no statistical differences between them.
CONCLUSION: Irrespective of which of the two morse taper implant connection systems of activation was analyzed, tapped-in (Bicon) or screwed-in (Ankylos), this in vitro experiment showed bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20074246     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01837.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  23 in total

1.  Assessment of lipopolysaccharide microleakage at conical implant-abutment connections.

Authors:  Sönke Harder; Elgar Susanne Quabius; Lars Ossenkop; Matthias Kern
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Evaluation of impression accuracy for a four-implant mandibular model--a digital approach.

Authors:  Michael Stimmelmayr; Kurt Erdelt; Jan-Frederik Güth; Arndt Happe; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Bacterial diversity of periodontal and implant-related sites detected by the DNA Checkerboard method.

Authors:  C do Nascimento; N Monesi; I Y Ito; J P M Issa; R F de Albuquerque Junior
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Determination of fluid leakages in the different screw-retained implant-abutment connections in a mechanical artificial mouth.

Authors:  D Martin-Gili; M Molmeneu; M Fernandez; M Punset; Ll Giner; J Armengou; F Javier Gil
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Implant-abutment leaking of replace conical connection nobel biocare® implant system. An in vitro study of the microbiological penetration from external environment to implant-abutment space.

Authors:  E El Haddad; A B Giannì; G E Mancini; F Cura; F Carinci
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-11-13

6.  Peri-implantitis. Part 2: Prevention and maintenance of peri-implant health.

Authors:  A Alani; K Bishop
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.626

7.  In vitro analysis of the microbiological sealing of tapered implants after mechanical cycling.

Authors:  Deceles Cristina Costa Alves; Paulo Sérgio Perri de Carvalho; Carlos Nelson Elias; Eduardo Vedovatto; Elizabeth Ferreira Martinez
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Clinical study evaluating the discrepancy of two different impression techniques of four implants in an edentulous jaw.

Authors:  Michael Stimmelmayr; Jan-Frederik Güth; Kurt Erdelt; Arndt Happe; Markus Schlee; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Analysis of the intraimplant microflora of two-piece dental implants.

Authors:  Sönke Harder; Rainer Podschun; Livia Grancicova; Christian Mehl; Matthias Kern
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  A new system of implant abutment connection: how to improve a two piece implant system sealing.

Authors:  F Grecchi; M DI Girolamo; F Cura; V Candotto; F Carinci
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.