Literature DB >> 11151013

Learning effective amino acid interactions through iterative stochastic techniques.

C Micheletti1, F Seno, J R Banavar, A Maritan.   

Abstract

The prediction of the three-dimensional structures of the native states of proteins from the sequences of their amino acids is one of the most important challenges in molecular biology. An essential task for solving this problem within coarse-grained models is the deduction of effective interaction potentials between the amino acids. Over the years, several techniques have been developed to extract potentials that are able to discriminate satisfactorily between the native and nonnative folds of a preassigned protein sequence. In general, when these potentials are used in actual dynamical folding simulations, they lead to a drift of the native structure outside the quasinative basin. In this article, we present and validate an approach to overcome this difficulty. By exploiting several numerical and analytical tools, we set up a rigorous iterative scheme to extract potentials satisfying a prerequisite of any viable potential: the stabilization of proteins within their native basin (less than 3-4 A RMSD). The scheme is flexible and is demonstrated to be applicable to a variety of parameterizations of the energy function, and it provides in each case the optimal potentials.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11151013     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0134(20010215)42:3<422::aid-prot120>3.0.co;2-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  11 in total

1.  Crucial stages of protein folding through a solvable model: predicting target sites for enzyme-inhibiting drugs.

Authors:  Cristian Micheletti; Fabio Cecconi; Alessandro Flammini; Amos Maritan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Inferring ideal amino acid interaction forms from statistical protein contact potentials.

Authors:  Piotr Pokarowski; Andrzej Kloczkowski; Robert L Jernigan; Neha S Kothari; Maria Pokarowska; Andrzej Kolinski
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005-04-01

3.  Amino acid interaction preferences in proteins.

Authors:  Anupam Nath Jha; Saraswathi Vishveshwara; Jayanth R Banavar
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Toward correct protein folding potentials.

Authors:  M Chhajer; G M Crippen
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.365

Review 5.  Principles and Overview of Sampling Methods for Modeling Macromolecular Structure and Dynamics.

Authors:  Tatiana Maximova; Ryan Moffatt; Buyong Ma; Ruth Nussinov; Amarda Shehu
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Extending the PRIME model for protein aggregation to all 20 amino acids.

Authors:  Mookyung Cheon; Iksoo Chang; Carol K Hall
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-11-01

7.  Scoring predictive models using a reduced representation of proteins: model and energy definition.

Authors:  Federico Fogolari; Lidia Pieri; Agostino Dovier; Luca Bortolussi; Gilberto Giugliarelli; Alessandra Corazza; Gennaro Esposito; Paolo Viglino
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2007-03-23

8.  EpicCapo: epitope prediction using combined information of amino acid pairwise contact potentials and HLA-peptide contact site information.

Authors:  Thammakorn Saethang; Osamu Hirose; Ingorn Kimkong; Vu Anh Tran; Xuan Tho Dang; Lan Anh T Nguyen; Tu Kien T Le; Mamoru Kubo; Yoichi Yamada; Kenji Satou
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  A protein folding potential that places the native states of a large number of proteins near a local minimum.

Authors:  Mukesh Chhajer; Gordon M Crippen
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2002-08-06

10.  How good are simplified models for protein structure prediction?

Authors:  Swakkhar Shatabda; M A Hakim Newton; Mahmood A Rashid; Duc Nghia Pham; Abdul Sattar
Journal:  Adv Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-04-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.