Literature DB >> 20070543

Interlead distance and left ventricular lead electrical delay predict reverse remodeling during cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Faisal M Merchant1, E Kevin Heist, K Veena Nandigam, Lawrence J Mulligan, Dan Blendea, Lindsay Riedl, David McCarty, Mary Orencole, Michael H Picard, Jeremy N Ruskin, Jagmeet P Singh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both anatomic interlead separation and left ventricle lead electrical delay (LVLED) have been associated with outcomes following cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, the relationship between interlead distance and electrical delay in predicting CRT outcomes has not been defined.
METHODS: We studied 61 consecutive patients undergoing CRT for standard clinical indications. All patients underwent intraprocedural measurement of LVLED. Interlead distances in the horizontal (HD), vertical (VD), and direct (DD) dimensions were measured from postprocedure chest radiographs (CXR). Remodeling indices [percent change in left ventricle (LV) ejection fraction, end-diastolic, end-systolic dimensions] were assessed by transthoracic echocardiogram.
RESULTS: There was a positive correlation between corrected LVLED and HD on lateral CXR (r = 0.361, P = 0.004) and a negative correlation between LVLED and VD on posteroanterior (PA) CXR (r =-0.281, P = 0.028). To account for this inverse relationship, we developed a composite anatomic distance (defined as: lateral HD-PA VD), which correlated most closely with LVLED (r = 0.404, P = 0.001). Follow-up was available for 48 patients. At a mean of 4.1 +/- 3.2 months, patients with optimal values for both corrected LVLED (>or=75%) and composite anatomic distance (>or=15 cm) demonstrated greater reverse LV remodeling than patients with either one or neither of these optimized values.
CONCLUSIONS: We identified a significant correlation between LV-right ventricular interlead distance and LVLED; additionally, both parameters act synergistically in predicting LV anatomic reverse remodeling. Efforts to optimize both interlead distance and electrical delay may improve CRT outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20070543     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02624.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  9 in total

Review 1.  How to improve outcomes with cardiac resynchronisation therapy: importance of lead positioning.

Authors:  Peter J Cowburn; Christophe Leclercq
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 2.  Targeting left ventricular lead placement to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes.

Authors:  Jeffrey Liu; Evan Adelstein; Samir Saba
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Ventricular pacing site separation by cardiac computed tomography: validation for the prediction of clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  S Modi; Raymond Yee; David Scholl; John Stirrat; Jorge A Wong; Carmen Lydell; Vamshi Kotha; Lorne J Gula; Allan C Skanes; Peter Leong-Sit; David McCarty; Maria Drangova; James A White
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Clinical, laboratory, and pacing predictors of CRT response.

Authors:  Jagdesh Kandala; Robert K Altman; Mi Young Park; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  A novel fluoroscopic method of measuring right-to-left interlead distance as a predictor of reverse left ventricular remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Gregorio Covino; Mario Volpicelli; Pietro Belli; Gennaro Ratti; Paolo Tammaro; Ciro Provvisiero; Carmine Ciardiello; Luca Auricchio; Ciro Fiorentino; Paolo Capogrosso
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Adverse response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with septal scar on cardiac MRI preventing a septal right ventricular lead position.

Authors:  Simon G Duckett; Matthew Ginks; Anoop Shetty; Senthil Kirubakaran; Julian Bostock; Stam Kapetanakis; Jaswinder Gill; Gerry Carr-White; Reza Razavi; C Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Electrical activation in the coronary sinus branches as a guide to cardiac resynchronisation therapy: rationale for a coordinate system.

Authors:  Christoph Scharf; Nazmi Krasniqi; Jens Hellermann; Mariette Rahn; Gabor Sütsch; Corinna Brunckhorst; Firat Duru
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison of right ventricular septal pacing and right ventricular apical pacing in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: the SEPTAL CRT Study.

Authors:  Christophe Leclercq; Nicolas Sadoul; Lluis Mont; Pascal Defaye; Joaquim Osca; Elisabeth Mouton; Richard Isnard; Gilbert Habib; Jose Zamorano; Genevieve Derumeaux; Ignacio Fernandez-Lozano
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Contractility surrogates derived from three-dimensional lead motion analysis and prediction of acute haemodynamic response to CRT.

Authors:  Stian Ross; Hans Henrik Odland; Trent Fischer; Thor Edvardsen; Lars Ove Gammelsrud; Trine Fink Haland; Richard Cornelussen; Einar Hopp; Erik Kongsgaard
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2018-12-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.