Literature DB >> 20065864

Aperius PercLID stand alone interspinous system for the treatment of degenerative lumbar stenosis: experience on 152 cases.

PierVittorio Nardi1, Daniel Cabezas, Giancarla Rea, Benedetta Ludovica Pettorini.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This study is a retrospective clinical investigation of a new interspinous device implanted via a totally percutaneous technique involving 152 consecutive patients.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the efficacy of the percutaneous Aperius stand alone implant in patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis and neurogenic intermittent claudication that did not respond to conservative treatment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The use of interspinous implants grew markedly during the last years. Nowadays, many extension controller devices are positioned through minimally invasive procedures.
METHODS: From January 2007 to February 2008, 152 consecutive patients with neurogenic intermittent claudication were treated with Aperius PercLID system. Under a local anesthesia, a 1.5 cm skin incision was performed. Trocars for interspinous space distraction were positioned using fluoroscopy guidance. A suitable size Aperius was positioned and released in the interspinous space with a totally percutaneous technique. In 145 patients 1 level was treated, whereas 6 patients received 2 level treatments, and 1 patient received 3 level treatments. The levels treated were L4-L5 in 125 patients (78.2%), L3-L4 level in 26 patients (16.3%), L2-L3 level in 5 patients (3.1%), L5-S1 level in 3 patients (1.8%), and L1-L2 level in 1 patient (0.6%).
RESULTS: The surgical time ranged from 8 to 14 minutes for 1 single level. No adverse events were noted. In 1 case (0.6%), Aperius was not implanted because of hypertrophic facet joints that have hindered the correct insertion of the device; we observed only 2 cases of therapeutic failure (1.3%). There was a significant improvement in the Visual Analog Scale and Zurich Claudication Questionnaire scores for low-back and leg pain and for neurogenic claudication.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that Aperius PercLID system offers an easy, safe, and effective treatment for patients with lumbar degenerative stenosis. Thus, this device system treatment represents a valid alternative to the traditional surgical techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20065864     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31819b08da

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  12 in total

Review 1.  Role of lumbar interspinous distraction on the neural elements.

Authors:  Alex Alfieri; Roberto Gazzeri; Julian Prell; Christian Scheller; Jens Rachinger; Christian Strauss; Andreas Schwarz
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 2.  Aperius interspinous device for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a review.

Authors:  Ashwanth Ramesh; Frank Lyons; Michael Kelleher
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Interspinous posterior devices: What is the real surgical indication?

Authors:  Alessandro Landi
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 1.337

4.  Percutaneous interspinous spacer versus open decompression: a 2-year follow-up of clinical outcome and quality of life.

Authors:  F Beyer; A Yagdiran; P Neu; T Kaulhausen; P Eysel; R Sobottke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Posterior vertebral arch cement augmentation (spinoplasty) to prevent fracture of spinous processes after interspinous spacer implant.

Authors:  G Bonaldi; G Bertolini; A Marrocu; A Cianfoni
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Clinical evaluation of the preliminary safety and effectiveness of a minimally invasive interspinous process device APERIUS(®) in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with symptomatic neurogenic intermittent claudication.

Authors:  Jan Van Meirhaeghe; Patrick Fransen; Daniele Morelli; Niall J A Craig; Gregor Godde; Attila Mihalyi; Frederic Collignon
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Effectiveness of interspinous implant surgery in patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wouter A Moojen; Mark P Arts; Ronald H M A Bartels; Wilco C H Jacobs; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer.

Authors:  Shay Shabat; Larry E Miller; Jon E Block; Reuven Gepstein
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 4.458

9.  Lumbar spinal stenosis treatment with Aperius perclid interspinous system.

Authors:  M F Surace; A Fagetti; S Fozzato; P Cherubino
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  The interspinous spacer: a clinicoanatomical investigation using plastination.

Authors:  Thomas Kaulhausen; Kourosh Zarghooni; Gregor Stein; Jutta Knifka; Peer Eysel; Juergen Koebke; Rolf Sobottke
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2012-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.