Literature DB >> 20065698

Ex vivo analysis of irradiated fingernails: chemical yields and properties of radiation-induced and mechanically-induced radicals.

Paul J Black1, Steven G Swarts.   

Abstract

A qualitative and quantitative analysis of the radicals underlying the radiation-induced signal (RIS) in fingernails was conducted in an attempt to identify properties of these radicals that could be used for biodosimetry purposes. A qualitative analysis of RIS showed the presence of at least three components, two of which were observed at low doses (<50 Gy) and the third required higher doses (>500 Gy). The low dose signal, obtained by reconstruction, consists of a 10 gauss singlet at g = 2.0053 and an 18 gauss doublet centered at g = 2.0044. Based on the initial slope of the dose-response curve, the chemical (radical) yields of the radicals giving rise to the singlet and doublet were 327 (+/-113) and 122 (+/-9) nmol J-1 (standard error, SE), respectively. At doses below 50 Gy, the singlet signal is the dominant component. Above this dose range, the signal intensity of the singlet rapidly dose-saturates. At doses <50 Gy, there is a small contribution of the doublet signal that increases in its proportion of the RIS as dose increases. A third component was revealed at high dose with a spectral extent of approximately 100 gauss and displayed peaks due to g anisotropy at g = 2.056, 2.026, and 1.996. The total radical yield calculated from the initial slope of the dose-response curve averaged 458 +/- (116) nmol J-1 (SE) in irradiated nail clippings obtained from six volunteers. Such high yields indicate that nails are a strong candidate for biodosimetry at low doses. In a comparison of relative stabilities of the radicals underlying the singlet and doublet signals, the stability of the doublet signal is more sensitive to the moisture content of the nail than the singlet. This differential in radical stabilities could provide a method for removing the doublet signal under controlled exposures to high humidities (>70% relative humidity). The decay of the singlet signal in RIS varies with exposure of a nail clipping to differing ambient humidities. However, long exposures (>6 h) to relative humidities of 72-94% results in singlet intensities that approach 7.0 +/- (3.2)% (standard deviation) of the original intensities in an irradiated nail. This result suggests the existence of a subpopulation of radicals underlying the singlet signal that is relatively insensitive to decay under exposure of nails even to high humidities. Therefore, exposures of an irradiated nail clipping under controlled humidities may provide a method for estimating the exposure dose of the nail that is based on the intensity of the signal of the humidity insensitive radical population underlying the singlet signal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20065698      PMCID: PMC3684967          DOI: 10.1097/HP.0b013e3181b0c045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  12 in total

1.  Protein thiyl radicals directly observed by EPR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Matthias Kolberg; Günther Bleifuss; Astrid Gräslund; Britt-Marie Sjöberg; Wolfgang Lubitz; Friedhelm Lendzian; Günter Lassmann
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 4.013

2.  EPR dosimetry in chemically treated fingernails.

Authors:  A Romanyukha; F Trompier; B Leblanc; C Calas; I Clairand; C A Mitchell; James G Smirniotopoulos; H M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.898

3.  Fingernail dosimetry: current status and perspectives.

Authors:  Alex Romanyukha; Ricardo A Reyes; Francois Trompier; Luis A Benevides
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.316

4.  Electron paramagnetic resonance in human fingernails: the sponge model implication.

Authors:  R A Reyes; A Romanyukha; F Trompier; C A Mitchell; I Clairand; T De; L A Benevides; H M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 5.  Electron movement through proteins and DNA.

Authors:  M C Symons
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.376

6.  Sulphur radicals formed by cutting alpha-keratin.

Authors:  H Chandra; M C Symons
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Aug 27-Sep 2       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The temperature dependence of radiation-induced free-radical destruction.

Authors:  P K Horan; W Snipes
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med       Date:  1971

8.  Electron spin resonance studies of free radical turnover in gamma-irradiated single crystals of alanine.

Authors:  W Snipes; P K Horan
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Dosimetry based on EPR spectral analysis of fingernail clippings.

Authors:  Dean E Wilcox; Xiaoming He; Jiang Gui; Andres E Ruuge; Hongbin Li; Benjamin B Williams; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.316

10.  An ESR investigation of the reactions of glutathione, cysteine and penicillamine thiyl radicals: competitive formation of RSO., R., RSSR-., and RSS(.).

Authors:  D Becker; S Swarts; M Champagne; M D Sevilla
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med       Date:  1988-05
View more
  17 in total

1.  Advances towards using finger/toenail dosimetry to triage a large population after potential exposure to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Xiaoming He; Jiang Gui; Thomas P Matthews; Benjamin B Williams; Steven G Swarts; Oleg Grinberg; Jason Sidabras; Dean E Wilcox; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.898

2.  Evaluating the Special Needs of The Military for Radiation Biodosimetry for Tactical Warfare Against Deployed Troops: Comparing Military to Civilian Needs for Biodosimetry Methods.

Authors:  Ann Barry Flood; Arif N Ali; Holly K Boyle; Gaixin Du; Victoria A Satinsky; Steven G Swarts; Benjamin B Williams; Eugene Demidenko; Wilson Schreiber; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  The effect of sunlight and UV lamps on EPR signal in nails.

Authors:  Agnieszka Marciniak; Bartłomiej Ciesielski; Małgorzata Juniewicz; Anita Prawdzik-Dampc; Mirosław Sawczak
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Electron paramagnetic resonance radiation dose assessment in fingernails of the victim exposed to high dose as result of an accident.

Authors:  Alexander Romanyukha; François Trompier; Ricardo A Reyes; Doran M Christensen; Carol J Iddins; Stephen L Sugarman
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Comparison of Continuous Wave and Rapid Scan X-band Electron Paramagnetic Resonance of Irradiated Clipped Fingernails.

Authors:  Hanan Elajaili; Joseph McPeak; Alexander Romanyukha; Priyanka Aggarwal; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 0.972

6.  Manganese transport via the transferrin mechanism.

Authors:  Thomas E Gunter; Brent Gerstner; Karlene K Gunter; Jon Malecki; Robert Gelein; William M Valentine; Michael Aschner; David I Yule
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 4.294

7.  Emergency EPR dosimetry technique using vacuum-stored dry nails.

Authors:  S Sholom; S W S McKeever
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 1.898

Review 8.  Clinical EPR: unique opportunities and some challenges.

Authors:  Harold M Swartz; Benjamin B Williams; Bassem I Zaki; Alan C Hartford; Lesley A Jarvis; Eunice Y Chen; Richard J Comi; Marc S Ernstoff; Huagang Hou; Nadeem Khan; Steven G Swarts; Ann B Flood; Periannan Kuppusamy
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  POSSIBLE NATURE OF THE RADIATION-INDUCED SIGNAL IN NAILS: HIGH-FIELD EPR, CONFIRMING CHEMICAL SYNTHESIS, AND QUANTUM CHEMICAL CALCULATIONS.

Authors:  Dmitriy S Tipikin; Steven G Swarts; Jason W Sidabras; François Trompier; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 0.972

10.  Development and validation of an ex vivo electron paramagnetic resonance fingernail biodosimetric method.

Authors:  Xiaoming He; Steven G Swarts; Eugene Demidenko; Ann B Flood; Oleg Grinberg; Jiang Gui; Michael Mariani; Stephen D Marsh; Andres E Ruuge; Jason W Sidabras; Dmitry Tipikin; Dean E Wilcox; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 0.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.