Literature DB >> 20063109

Health-related quality of life in patients treated for incisional hernia with an onlay technique.

M M Poelman1, J F Schellekens, B L A M Langenhorst, W H Schreurs.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An incisional hernia is a frequent complication of abdominal surgery. The repair of incisional hernias comes with a high risk of reherniation and serious complications. With the introduction of mesh repair, recurrence rates have decreased and subsequent clinical outcomes have improved. Whereas further research needs to be done to improve complication rates and recurrence, the focus has now been placed on quality-of-life outcomes in patients undergoing these repairs. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term health-related quality of life (HRQL) of patients who were treated for incisional hernias using an onlay technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over a period of 10 years (1997-2007), 101 patients with an incisional hernia were treated with an onlay marlex mesh, fixed on the fascia with skin staples. Of the 101 patients, there were 45 males and 56 females, and their mean age was 55 years. Nine patients died and 13 were lost during follow-up. Of the remaining 79 patients, eight refused to participate. The mean follow-up time was 64 months (normal distribution, standard deviation [SD] 35 months). The Short Form 36 (SF-36) and the Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (KPS) and a semi-structured interview were used to measure HRQL.
RESULTS: Seventy-one of the 101 patients were evaluated at our out-patient clinic. Twenty-one patients (20%) had an open-abdomen treatment in their medical history. The median admission time was 4.5 days (quartiles 3-6.25). The mean follow-up time was 64 months (SD 35 months). A seroma was reported in 27 of the 101 patients (27%) and a wound infection in 22 patients (21%), of which five patients had to be re-operated. Only if a patient was evaluated at our out-patient clinic could reherniation be scored; this occurred in 11 of 71 patients (16%). The evaluation of HRQL showed equal SF-36 scores for patients treated for an incisional hernia compared to their matched controls. Patients with a history of an open-abdominal treatment did not score significantly lower compared to patients without such a treatment. The median KPS score was 75, indicating that activities could be performed with effort and patients had some signs of disease.
CONCLUSION: HRQL is the same in patients treated for an incisional hernia compared to the matched controls. Therefore, the onlay technique seems to be an acceptable method to repair large incisional hernias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20063109     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-009-0619-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  24 in total

Review 1.  Surgical treatment of incisional hernia.

Authors:  K Cassar; A Munro
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight composite mesh with polyester or polypropylene mesh for incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  J Conze; A N Kingsnorth; J B Flament; R Simmermacher; G Arlt; C Langer; E Schippers; M Hartley; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; M Muller; P D Cohen; M L Essink-Bot; M Fekkes; R Sanderman; M A Sprangers; A te Velde; E Verrips
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Long-term outcome after open treatment of severe intra-abdominal infection and pancreatic necrosis.

Authors:  S Kriwanek; C Armbruster; K Dittrich; P Beckerhinn; A Schwarzmaier; E Redl
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-02

Review 5.  Measuring quality of life after surgery.

Authors:  David R Urbach
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.058

6.  Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia.

Authors:  Jacobus W A Burger; Roland W Luijendijk; Wim C J Hop; Jens A Halm; Emiel G G Verdaasdonk; Johannes Jeekel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Health-related quality of life in patients treated for enterocutaneous fistula.

Authors:  R G J Visschers; S W M Olde Damink; M van Bekkum; B Winkens; P B Soeters; W G van Gemert
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 8.  [Overview and evolving strategies of ventral hernia repair].

Authors:  M S Winkler; E Gerharz; U A Dietz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Patient-reported outcomes in hernia repair.

Authors:  E M Bitzer; C Lorenz; S Nickel; H Dörning; A Trojan
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 10.  Hernias: inguinal and incisional.

Authors:  Andrew Kingsnorth; Karl LeBlanc
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-11-08       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  11 in total

1.  Early repair of ventral incisional hernia may improve quality of life after surgery for abdominal malignancy: a prospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  M P Feng; R B Baucom; K K Broman; D A Harris; M D Holzman; L-C Huang; J L Kaiser; S L Kavalukas; O O Oyefule; S E Phillips; B K Poulose; R A Pierce
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Long term outcome and quality of life after open incisional hernia repair--light versus heavy weight meshes.

Authors:  Roland Ladurner; Costanza Chiapponi; Quirin Linhuber; Thomas Mussack
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Outcomes of open intraperitoneal incisional hernia repair based on patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  M A Beltrán; M-P Rioseco; M Molina; A Vera; F R Arcos
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-01-06       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and propensity score matched studies.

Authors:  Ramkumar Mohan; Marcus Yeow; Joel Yat Seng Wong; Nicholas Syn; Sujith Wijerathne; Davide Lomanto
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Interposition of the hernia sac as a protective layer in repair of giant incisional hernia with polypropylene mesh.

Authors:  Mustafa Hasbahceci; Fatih Basak
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Importance of recurrence rating, morphology, hernial gap size, and risk factors in ventral and incisional hernia classification.

Authors:  U A Dietz; M S Winkler; R W Härtel; A Fleischhacker; A Wiegering; C Isbert; Ch Jurowich; P Heuschmann; C-T Germer
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Patient Satisfaction, chronic pain, and functional status following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Mike K Liang; Marissa Clapp; Linda T Li; Rachel L Berger; Stephanie C Hicks; Samir Awad
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Biologic mesh for repair of ventral hernias in contaminated fields: long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Amin Madani; Petru Niculiseanu; Wanda Marini; Pepa A Kaneva; Benjamin Mappin-Kasirer; Melina C Vassiliou; Kosar Khwaja; Paola Fata; Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair.

Authors:  F Muysoms; G Campanelli; G G Champault; A C DeBeaux; U A Dietz; J Jeekel; U Klinge; F Köckerling; V Mandala; A Montgomery; S Morales Conde; F Puppe; R K J Simmermacher; M Śmietański; M Miserez
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Early outcome of incisional hernia repair using polypropylene mesh: A preliminary report.

Authors:  Isaac A Udo; Emem A Bassey; Aniekan M Abasiattai
Journal:  Niger Med J       Date:  2014-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.