Literature DB >> 20061156

Optimized functional femoral rotation in navigated total knee arthroplasty considering ligament tension.

T A Walde1, J Bussert, S Sehmisch, P Balcarek, K M Stürmer, H J Walde, K H Frosch.   

Abstract

Femoral malrotation in total knee arthroplasty is correlated to an increased number of revisions. Anatomic landmarks such as Whiteside line, posterior condyle axis and transepicondylar axis are used for determining femoral component rotation. The femoral rotation achieved with the anatomical landmarks is compared to the femoral rotation achieved by a navigated ligament tension-based tibia-first technique. Ninety-three consecutive patients with gonarthritis were prospectively enrolled. Intraoperatively the anatomical landmarks for femoral rotation and the achieved femoral rotation using a navigated tension-based tibia-first technique were determined and stored for further comparison. A pre- and postoperative functional diagram displaying the extension and flexion and varus or valgus positions was also part of the evaluation. Using anatomical landmarks the rotational errors ranged from 12.2° of internal rotation to 15.5° of external rotation from parallel to the tibial resection surface at 90° flexion. A statistical significant improved femoral rotation was achieved using the ligament tension-based method with a rotational error ranged from 3.0° of internal rotation to 2.4° of external rotation. The functional analyses demonstrated statistical significant lower varus/valgus deviations within the flexion range and an improved maximum varus deviation at 90° flexion using the ligament tension-based method. Compared to the anatomical landmarks a balanced, almost parallel flexion gap was achieved using a navigation technique taking the ligament tension of the knee joint into account. As a result the improved femoral rotation was demonstrated by the functional evaluation. Unilateral overloading of the polyethylene inlay and unilateral instability can thus be avoided.
Copyright © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20061156     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  6 in total

1.  No difference between computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: five-year results of a prospective randomised study.

Authors:  Jörg Lützner; Julian Dexel; Stephan Kirschner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-14       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The impact of a rectangular or trapezoidal flexion gap on the femoral component rotation in TKA.

Authors:  Dae-Hee Lee; Debabrata Padhy; Jong-Hoon Park; Woong-Kyo Jeong; Ji-Hun Park; Seung-Beom Han
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  No correlation between rotation of femoral components in the transverse plane and clinical outcome after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Roland Becker; Katharina Bäker; Hagen Hommel; Manfred Bernard; Sebastian Kopf
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament does not affect femoral rotational alignment in TKA using a gap-balance technique.

Authors:  Yoshinori Ishii; Hideo Noguchi; Junko Sato; Koji Todoroki; Shin-ichi Toyabe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  A computer-assisted, tibia-first technique for improved femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Chong Meng Lee; Malkit K Dhillon; Mohd Amin Sulaiman
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2017-08-18

6.  Internal femoral component rotation adversely influences load transfer in total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric navigated study using the Verasense device.

Authors:  William A Manning; Kanishka M Ghosh; Alasdair Blain; Lee Longstaff; Steven P Rushton; David J Deehan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 4.342

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.