Literature DB >> 20060918

Brain composition and olfactory learning in honey bees.

Wulfila Gronenberg1, Margaret J Couvillon.   

Abstract

Correlations between brain or brain component size and behavioral measures are frequently studied by comparing different animal species, which sometimes introduces variables that complicate interpretation in terms of brain function. Here, we have analyzed the brain composition of honey bees (Apis mellifera) that have been individually tested in an olfactory learning paradigm. We found that the total brain size correlated with the bees' learning performance. Among different brain components, only the mushroom body, a structure known to be involved in learning and memory, showed a positive correlation with learning performance. In contrast, visual neuropils were relatively smaller in bees that performed better in the olfactory learning task, suggesting modality-specific behavioral specialization of individual bees. This idea is also supported by inter-individual differences in brain composition. Some slight yet statistically significant differences in the brain composition of European and Africanized honey bees are reported. Larger bees had larger brains, and by comparing brains of different sizes, we report isometric correlations for all brain components except for a small structure, the central body. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20060918      PMCID: PMC4451457          DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2010.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  42 in total

1.  Multiple sites of associative odor learning as revealed by local brain microinjections of octopamine in honeybees.

Authors:  M Hammer; R Menzel
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Brain organization mirrors caste differences, colony founding and nest architecture in paper wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae).

Authors:  Y Molina; R M Harris; S O'Donnell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Experience-expectant plasticity in the mushroom bodies of the honeybee.

Authors:  S E Fahrbach; D Moore; E A Capaldi; S M Farris; G E Robinson
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 4.  Does bigger mean better? Evolutionary determinants of brain size and structure.

Authors:  F Aboitiz
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.808

5.  Optimization and investigation of the use of 2,2-dimethoxypropane as a dehydration agent for plant tissues in transmission electron microscopy.

Authors:  J R Thorpe; D M Harvey
Journal:  J Ultrastruct Res       Date:  1979-08

6.  Experience- and age-related outgrowth of intrinsic neurons in the mushroom bodies of the adult worker honeybee.

Authors:  S M Farris; G E Robinson; S E Fahrbach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Brain allometry in bumblebee and honey bee workers.

Authors:  Stefanie Mares; Lesley Ash; Wulfila Gronenberg
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 1.808

8.  Effects of experience and juvenile hormone on the organization of the mushroom bodies of honey bees.

Authors:  G S Withers; S E Fahrbach; G E Robinson
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  1995-01

9.  Volume changes in the mushroom bodies of adult honey bee queens.

Authors:  S E Fahrbach; T Giray; G E Robinson
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  The structural organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (SI) of mouse cerebral cortex. The description of a cortical field composed of discrete cytoarchitectonic units.

Authors:  T A Woolsey; H Van der Loos
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1970-01-20       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  8 in total

1.  Investment in higher order central processing regions is not constrained by brain size in social insects.

Authors:  Mario L Muscedere; Wulfila Gronenberg; Corrie S Moreau; James F A Traniello
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Insecticide exposure during brood or early-adult development reduces brain growth and impairs adult learning in bumblebees.

Authors:  Dylan B Smith; Andres N Arce; Ana Ramos Rodrigues; Philipp H Bischoff; Daisy Burris; Farah Ahmed; Richard J Gill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Nasonia Parasitic Wasps Escape from Haller's Rule by Diphasic, Partially Isometric Brain-Body Size Scaling and Selective Neuropil Adaptations.

Authors:  Jitte Groothuis; Hans M Smid
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 1.808

4.  Evolutionary ecology of intraspecific brain size variation: a review.

Authors:  Abigél Gonda; Gábor Herczeg; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Exploring miniature insect brains using micro-CT scanning techniques.

Authors:  Dylan B Smith; Galina Bernhardt; Nigel E Raine; Richard L Abel; Dan Sykes; Farah Ahmed; Inti Pedroso; Richard J Gill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Comparison of Navigation-Related Brain Regions in Migratory versus Non-Migratory Noctuid Moths.

Authors:  Liv de Vries; Keram Pfeiffer; Björn Trebels; Andrea K Adden; Ken Green; Eric Warrant; Stanley Heinze
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  No gains for bigger brains: Functional and neuroanatomical consequences of relative brain size in a parasitic wasp.

Authors:  Emma van der Woude; Jitte Groothuis; Hans M Smid
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 2.411

8.  Differential investment in visual and olfactory brain areas reflects behavioural choices in hawk moths.

Authors:  Anna Stöckl; Stanley Heinze; Alice Charalabidis; Basil El Jundi; Eric Warrant; Almut Kelber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.