Literature DB >> 20060332

Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: predicting nodal metastases by histologic grade, pattern of invasion and clinical examination.

Ibrahim Alkatout1, Carsten Maik Naumann, Jürgen Hedderich, Axel Hegele, Christian Bolenz, Klaus-Peter Jünemann, Günter Klöppel.   

Abstract

With a diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis, there is still a significant need to define the tumor criteria that allow the disease to be stratified according to the risk of developing lymph node metastases. The histopathology of the primary tumor in 72 consecutive patients with resected squamous cell carcinoma of the penis was reviewed for this study. Tumor tissue was reviewed for (1) histologic grade, (2) invasion pattern, (3) tumor stage, (4) proportion of poorly differentiated tumor cells, (5) invasion depth, (6) proportion of tumor necrosis, (7) angioinvasion, (8) histologic classification, (9) number of lesions, (10) growth pattern, (11) number of mitoses, (12) degree of keratinization, and (13) clinical groin status. It was found that the presence of inguinal lymph node metastases correlated in descending order of frequency with grade G2/G3, clinically positive groin status, reticular invasion, stage pT2/T3, >50% poorly differentiated tumor cells, depth of invasion, and comedolike tumor necrosis. These results revealed that the risk of inguinal lymph node metastasis in penile carcinoma can be predicted on the basis of 3 major factors: histologic grade, pattern of invasion, and clinical groin status.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20060332     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  8 in total

Review 1.  Current Management Strategy for Penile Cancer and Future Directions.

Authors:  Tanya B Dorff; Leslie K Ballas; Anne K Schuckman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Penile preserving and reconstructive surgery in the management of penile cancer.

Authors:  Arthur L Burnett
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Prognostic factors in patients with penile cancer after surgical management.

Authors:  Shuguang Wen; Wenbiao Ren; Bichen Xue; Yi Fan; Yongjun Jiang; Chunming Zeng; Yujia Li; Xiongbing Zu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Vulvar cancer: epidemiology, clinical presentation, and management options.

Authors:  Ibrahim Alkatout; Melanie Schubert; Nele Garbrecht; Marion Tina Weigel; Walter Jonat; Christoph Mundhenke; Veronika Günther
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-03-20

5.  Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Penile Cancer Using Clinicopathological Factors and Nomograms.

Authors:  Yanxiang Shao; Xiang Tu; Yang Liu; Yige Bao; Shangqing Ren; Zhen Yang; Xu Hu; Kan Wu; Hao Zeng; Qiang Wei; Xiang Li
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 3.989

6.  Evaluation of the Cellular Dissociation Grading, Based on Tumor Budding and Cell Nest Size, in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis.

Authors:  Hayel Derani; Anne-Sophie Becker; Oliver Hakenberg; Andreas Erbersdobler
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-09       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 7.  Detection of lymph node metastases in penile cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan B Bloom; Michael Stern; Neel H Patel; Michael Zhang; John L Phillips
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-10

8.  Predictors of inguinal lymph node metastasis in penile cancer patients: a meta-analysis of retrospective studies.

Authors:  Jiao Hu; Yu Cui; Peihua Liu; Xu Zhou; Wenbiao Ren; Jinbo Chen; Xiongbing Zu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.989

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.