Literature DB >> 20060226

Women's preferences for masculinity in male faces are highest during reproductive age range and lower around puberty and post-menopause.

Anthony C Little1, Tamsin K Saxton, S Craig Roberts, Benedict C Jones, Lisa M Debruine, Jovana Vukovic, David I Perrett, David R Feinberg, Todd Chenore.   

Abstract

Masculinity in male faces is thought to be a sign of mate quality and is associated with measures of long-term health. Previous studies have demonstrated that women's masculinity preferences change across the menstrual cycle with women preferring more masculine men during phases of the menstrual cycle where fertility is highest (i.e. the late follicular phase). Given the hormonal correlates of such preferences and that these hormones change across the life span, we tested for differences in female masculinity preferences at different ages. We compared the masculinity preferences of peri-pubescent girls and young adult women (Study 1), circum-menopausal women reporting to either be pre- or post-menopause (Study 2), and a large sample of women across a wide range of ages (Study 3). In all three studies, preferences for masculinity in male faces were highest in women who were at a reproductively active age. Preferences for masculinity were lower when females were peri-pubescent, post-menopausal, or at ages corresponding to these groups. These data support the notion that masculinity in male faces is an important trait for reproductively relevant mate choice decisions. These data also highlight a shift in female visual preferences for men that is associated with important stages of the lifespan. Visual preferences appear to track important hormonal changes associated with age; as women pass puberty their preferences shift towards facial traits associated with mate quality and as women undergo menopause their preferences for such facial traits decrease. Overall, these results demonstrate the important role of reproductive status and support the notion that preferences for male faces are tied to reproductively relevant hormones. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20060226     DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology        ISSN: 0306-4530            Impact factor:   4.905


  13 in total

Review 1.  Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Life history of female preferences for male faces: a comparison of pubescent girls, nonpregnant and pregnant young women, and middle-aged women.

Authors:  Krzysztof Kościński
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2011-12

3.  Digit ratio (2D:4D) predicts facial, but not voice or body odour, attractiveness in men.

Authors:  Camille Ferdenzi; Jean-François Lemaître; Juan David Leongómez; S Craig Roberts
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Relationship satisfaction and outcome in women who meet their partner while using oral contraception.

Authors:  S Craig Roberts; Katerina Klapilová; Anthony C Little; Robert P Burriss; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine; Marion Petrie; Jan Havlícek
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Human preferences for sexually dimorphic faces may be evolutionarily novel.

Authors:  Isabel M Scott; Andrew P Clark; Steven C Josephson; Adam H Boyette; Innes C Cuthill; Ruby L Fried; Mhairi A Gibson; Barry S Hewlett; Mark Jamieson; William Jankowiak; P Lynne Honey; Zejun Huang; Melissa A Liebert; Benjamin G Purzycki; John H Shaver; J Josh Snodgrass; Richard Sosis; Lawrence S Sugiyama; Viren Swami; Douglas W Yu; Yangke Zhao; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Preferences for very low and very high voice pitch in humans.

Authors:  Daniel E Re; Jillian J M O'Connor; Patrick J Bennett; David R Feinberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Robot Art, in the Eye of the Beholder?: Personalized Metaphors Facilitate Communication of Emotions and Creativity.

Authors:  Martin Cooney
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2021-07-15

8.  Do men's faces really signal heritable immunocompetence?

Authors:  Isabel M L Scott; Andrew P Clark; Lynda G Boothroyd; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.671

9.  Environmental influences on mate preferences as assessed by a scenario manipulation experiment.

Authors:  Daniele Marzoli; Francesco Moretto; Aura Monti; Ornella Tocci; S Craig Roberts; Luca Tommasi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A lover or a fighter? Opposing sexual selection pressures on men's vocal pitch and facial hair.

Authors:  Tamsin K Saxton; Lauren L Mackey; Kristofor McCarty; Nick Neave
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2015-11-01       Impact factor: 2.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.