BACKGROUND: The large size of many feline platelets and the high frequency of platelet aggregation often results in falsely low platelet counts in this species. A combination of optical platelet counting to detect even large platelets and the use of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) to inhibit platelet clumping may increase the accuracy of feline platelet counting. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare platelet counts in feline whole blood samples with and without the addition of PGE1 and using different analytical methods in a clinical setting. METHODS: Platelet counts were determined in 10 feline patients in a referral veterinary hospital using 2 sample types (EDTA, EDTA with PGE1) and 2 methods of analysis (optical counting [PLT-O] and impedance counting [PLT-I]) on the Sysmex XT 2000 iV analyzer. RESULTS: All PGE1-PLT-O samples had platelet counts of >200 x 10(9)/L. Mean platelet count using PGE1-PLT-O (410,256+/-178 x 10(9)/L) was significantly higher (P<.03) compared with PGE1-PLT-I (256+/-113 x 10(9)/L), EDTA-PLT-O (238+/-107 x 10(9)/L), and EDTA-PLT-I (142+/-84 x 10(9)/L) methods. Depending on the method, platelet counts in 2 to 7 of 10 cats were <200 x 10(9)/L when PGE1-PLT-O was not used. A slightly increased platelet count in response to treatment of a feline patient with thrombocytopenia would have been missed without use of PGE1-PLT-O. CONCLUSIONS: Using PLT-O analysis on EDTA samples containing PGE1 provides higher, and therefore likely more accurate, feline platelet counts in a clinical setting.
BACKGROUND: The large size of many feline platelets and the high frequency of platelet aggregation often results in falsely low platelet counts in this species. A combination of optical platelet counting to detect even large platelets and the use of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) to inhibit platelet clumping may increase the accuracy of feline platelet counting. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare platelet counts in feline whole blood samples with and without the addition of PGE1 and using different analytical methods in a clinical setting. METHODS: Platelet counts were determined in 10 feline patients in a referral veterinary hospital using 2 sample types (EDTA, EDTA with PGE1) and 2 methods of analysis (optical counting [PLT-O] and impedance counting [PLT-I]) on the Sysmex XT 2000 iV analyzer. RESULTS: All PGE1-PLT-O samples had platelet counts of >200 x 10(9)/L. Mean platelet count using PGE1-PLT-O (410,256+/-178 x 10(9)/L) was significantly higher (P<.03) compared with PGE1-PLT-I (256+/-113 x 10(9)/L), EDTA-PLT-O (238+/-107 x 10(9)/L), and EDTA-PLT-I (142+/-84 x 10(9)/L) methods. Depending on the method, platelet counts in 2 to 7 of 10 cats were <200 x 10(9)/L when PGE1-PLT-O was not used. A slightly increased platelet count in response to treatment of a feline patient with thrombocytopenia would have been missed without use of PGE1-PLT-O. CONCLUSIONS: Using PLT-O analysis on EDTA samples containing PGE1 provides higher, and therefore likely more accurate, feline platelet counts in a clinical setting.
Authors: Barbara Riond; Andrea Katharina Waßmuth; Sonja Hartnack; Regina Hofmann-Lehmann; Hans Lutz Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2015-08-06 Impact factor: 2.741