| Literature DB >> 20057958 |
Ryan W Hunt1, Andrey Zavalin2, Ashish Bhatnagar1, Senthil Chinnasamy1, Keshav C Das1.
Abstract
The surge of interest in bioenergy has been marked with increasing efforts in research and development to identify new sources of biomass and to incorporate cutting-edge biotechnology to improve efficiency and increase yields. It is evident that various microorganisms will play an integral role in the development of this newly emerging industry, such as yeast for ethanol and Escherichia coli for fine chemical fermentation. However, it appears that microalgae have become the most promising prospect for biomass production due to their ability to grow fast, produce large quantities of lipids, carbohydrates and proteins, thrive in poor quality waters, sequester and recycle carbon dioxide from industrial flue gases and remove pollutants from industrial, agricultural and municipal wastewaters. In an attempt to better understand and manipulate microorganisms for optimum production capacity, many researchers have investigated alternative methods for stimulating their growth and metabolic behavior. One such novel approach is the use of electromagnetic fields for the stimulation of growth and metabolic cascades and controlling biochemical pathways. An effort has been made in this review to consolidate the information on the current status of biostimulation research to enhance microbial growth and metabolism using electromagnetic fields. It summarizes information on the biostimulatory effects on growth and other biological processes to obtain insight regarding factors and dosages that lead to the stimulation and also what kind of processes have been reportedly affected. Diverse mechanistic theories and explanations for biological effects of electromagnetic fields on intra and extracellular environment have been discussed. The foundations of biophysical interactions such as bioelectromagnetic and biophotonic communication and organization within living systems are expounded with special consideration for spatiotemporal aspects of electromagnetic topology, leading to the potential of multipolar electromagnetic systems. The future direction for the use of biostimulation using bioelectromagnetic, biophotonic and electrochemical methods have been proposed for biotechnology industries in general with emphasis on an holistic biofuel system encompassing production of algal biomass, its processing and conversion to biofuel.Entities:
Keywords: algae; bioenergy; biofuels; biomass; biostimulation; electromagnetic field; growth; metabolism; multipolar
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 20057958 PMCID: PMC2790121 DOI: 10.3390/ijms10104515
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1.Overview of various electromagnetic stimulation modalities from fields and waves.
Figure 4.Concept map of an EMF biostimulation at different levels of living systems.
Summary of electromagnetic treatments of some microorganisms.
| MW | 13.5–36.5 GHz | Increase in growth, cell count and size and methane production | [ | |
| PMF | 0.05–1 mT | Stimulated transposition activity & reduced cell viability | [ | |
| AC MF | 16, 60 Hz | Enolase activity stimulation; Suppression of enolase activity | [ | |
| 0.05–1 mT | Reduced transposition activity & enhanced cell viability | [ | ||
| OMF | 100 mT | Exposure time dependent stimulation or inhibition of cell viability | [ | |
| 30 μT | Cell density dependent changes in AVTD | [ | ||
| DC EF | NA | Increase in growth, removal of inhibitory compounds in medium | [ | |
| AC MF | 0.1–1 mT @ 50 Hz | Significant morphotype changes & alteration during cell division | [ | |
| ACEF | 2.5–50 V/cm @ 0.05–100 kHz | Stimulation of membrane bound ATP synthesis, optimum at 100 Hz | [ | |
| 6-polar ACEF | 0.35–2.1 kHz for test tubes 60 Hz for Petri dishes | Increase in growth in test tubes (147 ± 24%) and colonies (42–179%) | [ | |
| 6-polar ACEF | 1 kHz | Increase in growth in tubes (196 ± 29%) and colonies | [ | |
| SMF | ~0.39 T | Increase in growth | [ | |
| AC MF | 0.8, 2.5 mT, 0.8 and 1 kHz | Growth increase and interestingly a loss of intercellular cohesion | [ | |
| AC MF | 0–0.3 Hz @ 5−90 mT | Elevated or even diminished growth rates for | [ | |
| PMF | 0.6–1.3 mT | Increase in growth | [ | |
| PMF | 1.5 mV cm−1 | Increase in growth, cellulase activity and secretion | [ | |
| PMF | 1.5 mV cm−1 | Increased antibiotic production, O2 evolution, glucose uptake | [ | |
| OMF | 15 mT@ 0.3Hz | Growth stimulation, Mutation reversion rate unaffected | [ | |
| SMF | 500–800 mT | Growth inhibition followed by stimulation after 6 h | [ | |
| AC MF | 4.9 mT, 50 Hz | Increase in ATP levels by about 30% | [ | |
| Natural Flora | SMF | 22 mT | Enhanced degradation of phenolic waste liquors | [ |
| Natural Flora | PEF | 1.25 – 3.25 kVcm−1 | Enhanced biosorption of uranium | [ |
| Bacteria & yeast | OMF | 15 mT@ 0.3 Hz | Larger increase (30%) in growth in gram –ve ( | [ |
| AC/DC MF | 0.13–0.3 T | Increase in porphyrin synthesis, Enhanced expression of 5-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase | [ | |
| SMF | 10 mT | Increase in growth (50%), O2, sugar, phycocyanin | [ | |
| 250 mT | Increase in growth (22%), CNP-Uptake, Chl, minerals | [ | ||
| MW | 7.1 mm @ 2.2mWcm−2 | Increased growth (50%) | [ | |
| SMF | 300 mT | Increase in growth, pigments, carbohydrate and protein | [ | |
| SMF | 10–35 mT | Increase in growth (100%); Stimulated antioxidant defense | [ | |
| SMF | 6–58 mT | Increase in growth (NA) | [ | |
| SMF | 10–23 mT | Increase in growth (90%), and β-carotene | [ | |
| PEF | NA | Enhanced oil extraction- Solvent+Electroporation | [ | |
| PMF | ~ 4.7 μT | Increased activity of alcohol dehydrogenase | [ | |
| OMF+SMF | 20 mT + 8 mT | Increase in ethanol, sugar utilization | [ | |
| OMF | 0.28–12 mT | Increase in growth | [ | |
| OMF | 0.2–12 mT @ 50 Hz | Increase in growth (25 +/− 5%) | [ | |
| AC/DC EF | 100/10 mA | Increase in growth, organic acid production, cell budding | [ | |
| MW | 42GHz@ < 3 mWcm−2 | Frequency dependent increase or decrease in growth | [ | |
| 6-polar ACEF | 1 kHz | Increase in gas production (195 ± 20%) | [ | |
| AC MF | 0.5 μT, 100 200 Hz | 30% reduction in respiration | [ | |
| Better UV survival in those given magnetic pretreatment | [ | |||
| [ | ||||
| Respiration stimulation | ||||
| SMF | ~0.26 T | Increase in growth (27–36%) | [ | |
| PEF | 0.25 kV | Increased ethanol production and cellobiose utilization | [ | |
| ELF EMF | 45,60,75 Hz | Delayed mitosis by 0.5 to 2 h | [ | |
| AC MF | 0.1 mT, 60 Hz | Lower ATP levels but no decreased respiration | [ | |
| 0.2 mT and 60 and 75 Hz | Reduced respiration | |||
| SMF | Field strength dependent growth stimulation/inhibition | [ | ||
| AC MF | 1.8 mT, 72 Hz | Ca2+ specific increase in cell division rates, absent in the presence of a Ca2+ blocker, Alterations in membrane fluidity | [ | |
| AC MF | 10 mT, 60 Hz | Delayed cell division and increased oxygen uptake | [ | |
AC-EF: alternating current electric field; DC-EF: direct current electric field; MW: microwave; OMF: oscillating magnetic field; SMF: static magnetic field; PEF: pulsed electric field; PMF: pulsed magnetic field.
Figure 2.Cross-section of a test tube and a 6-polar electrode configuration for biostimulation of E.coli.
Figure 3.Maximum growth increase, achieved in E. coli cultures in test tubes versus frequency of the 6-polar AC EMF treatment (right vertical axis). The left vertical axis shows time to achieve the maximum, while the right axis shows concentration increase with respect to the control.
Overview of biophotonic and distant intercellular interactions (D.I.) experiments, delayed luminescence (D.L.), and spontaneous emission (S.E.).
| D.I. & S.E. | Established destructive interference found at natural population density | [ | |
| D.I. & D.L. | Changes in external environment demonstrated dose/intensity dependent decay curves | [ | |
| D.I. w/E-Field | E-field stimulated distant culture’s photonic activity and synchronization | [ | |
| D.I. | Established destructive interference and synchronization of photon pulses | [ | |
| XC tumor cells | D.I. | Dense cell culture stimulated growth rate of isolated culture via optical contact | [ |
| Epithelial cells | D.I. w/H2O2 | Reduction in protein, increased nuclear activation, and structural damage | [ |
| D.I. | Synchronized growth parameters when in optical contact of Vis-IR. | [ | |
| D.I. | Stimulation of cellular subdivision via optical coupling with culture of same type | [ | |
| D.I. | Long range interactions of an isolated culture diminished adhesion between cells of another culture | [ | |
| D.I. | Isolated treated culture stimulated growth of second culture of same species | [ | |
| Fibroblasts | D.I. w/Viruses | Three viral effects transferred to 72–78% of distant isolated cells | [ |
| D.I. w/HgCl2 | Effects transferred to 78% of distant isolated cells | ||
| D.I. w/Rad | UV radiation effects transferred to 82% of distant isolated cells | ||
| S.E. | Measured coherent emission from 200–800 nm which differed between male and female specimens | [ |
Overview of existing application of bioelectromagnetic fields.
| PEMF | Chronic wound healing, and non-union fracture healing | [ | |
| Chronic wound healing | [ | ||
| Treatment of osteonecrosis | [ | ||
| Treatment of pressure ulcers in spinal-cord injuries | [ | ||
| Treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee | [ | ||
| Treatment of grade I & II ankle sprains | [ | ||
| Treatment of venous leg ulceration | [ | ||
| SMF | Treated water to stimulate germination in | [ | |
| Treated chickpea seeds increased germination, seedling and root length & size | [ | ||
| Treated water increased plant height, branch number, and shoot dry weight | [ | ||
| Treated wheat seeds increased germination, yields, and protein | [ | ||
| Treated rice seeds and water increased rate and % of germination | [ | ||
| Treated barley seeds and water increased length and weight | [ | ||
| OMF | Treated tomato seeds for increased growth, yields, and disease resistance | [ | |
Figure 6.Integrated biostimulation/biofuel production system.
Figure 7.Bioengineering of algae cultivation.