Literature DB >> 20057313

Performance of anal cytology in a clinical setting when measured against histology and high-resolution anoscopy findings.

Mayura Nathan1, Naveena Singh, Nigel Garrett, Nicola Hickey, Teresa Prevost, Michael Sheaff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The success of cervical cytology in screening for cervical neoplasia has led to the concept of anal cytology screening for anal neoplasia. Our objective is to study the performance of anal cytology as a screening tool.
DESIGN: We assessed anal cytology against histology and high-resolution anoscopy in a clinical setting.
METHODS: Anal pap test was obtained prior to high-resolution anoscopy examinations and biopsies. The results were analysed against a number of patient variables.
RESULTS: From 395 individuals (93% men), 584 anal pap tests were obtained. HIV status was positive in 212 (54%) and negative in 156 (39%) individuals. On the basis of 288 histology results, the sensitivity of anal cytology to detect disease was 70% [95% confidence interval (CI) 64-75], whereas the specificity was 67% (95% CI 38-88). For high-grade disease (anal intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3), sensitivity of anal cytology was 81% (95% CI 70-90), and the negative predictive value was 85% (95% CI 76-92). Sensitivity was dependent on the area of disease (86% for two or more quadrants vs. 69% for one or more quadrants, P = 0.002) and HIV positivity (76% in HIV positive vs. 59% in HIV negative, P = 0.009). Amongst HIV-positive patients, the sensitivity was 90% when CD4 cell count was 400 cells/microl or less compared with 67% when CD4 cell count was above 400 cells/microl (P = 0.005).
CONCLUSION: Anal cytology performs similar to cervical cytology in a clinical setting. Sensitivity of anal smear is dependent on the area (quadrants) of disease present. Sensitivity of anal cytology is enhanced when CD4 cell count is less than 400 cells/microl in HIV-positive men. Our results may explain the variable sensitivity reported in the literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20057313     DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328333ab8e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS        ISSN: 0269-9370            Impact factor:   4.177


  20 in total

1.  Anoscopy.

Authors:  David Ponka; Faisal Baddar
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Risk factors for abnormal anal cytology over time in HIV-infected women.

Authors:  Amy S Baranoski; Richa Tandon; Janice Weinberg; Faye F Huang; Elizabeth A Stier
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Comparison of nylon-flocked swab and Dacron swab cytology for anal HSIL detection in transgender women and gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Dorothy J Wiley; Hilary K Hsu; Martha A Ganser; Jenny Brook; David A Elashoff; Matthew G Moran; Stephen A Young; Nancy E Joste; Ronald Mitsuyasu; Teresa M Darragh; David H Morris; Otoniel M Martínez-Maza; Roger Detels; Jian Yu Rao; Robert K Bolan; Eric T Shigeno; Ernesto Rodriguez
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Safety and immunogenicity of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus (qHPV) vaccine in HIV-positive Spanish men who have sex with men (MSM).

Authors:  Carmen Hidalgo-Tenorio; Jessica Ramírez-Taboada; Concepción Gil-Anguita; Javier Esquivias; Mohamed Omar-Mohamed-Balgahata; Antonio SamPedro; Miguel Lopez-Ruz; Juan Pasquau
Journal:  AIDS Res Ther       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.250

5.  Anal Cancer Screening in Men Who Have Sex With Men in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study.

Authors:  Gypsyamber DʼSouza; Alicia Wentz; Dorothy Wiley; Nisha Shah; Francine Barrington; Teresa M Darragh; Nancy Joste; Michael Plankey; Susheel Reddy; Elizabeth C Breen; Stephen Young; Ross D Cranston
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 3.731

6.  Comparison of 2 anal cytology protocols to predict high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Dorothy JoAnn Wiley; Hilary Hsu; Robert Bolan; Alen Voskanian; David Elashoff; Stephen Young; Ruvy Dayrit; Provaboti Barman; Katherine DeAzambuja; Emmanuel V Masongsong; Otoniel Martínez-Maza; Roger Detels
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Estimating the accuracy of anal cytology in the presence of an imperfect reference standard.

Authors:  William C Mathews; Edward R Cachay; Joseph Caperna; Amy Sitapati; Bard Cosman; Ian Abramson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparative accuracy of anal and cervical cytology in screening for moderate to severe dysplasia by magnification guided punch biopsy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wm Christopher Mathews; Wollelaw Agmas; Edward Cachay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Relative accuracy of cervical and anal cytology for detection of high grade lesions by colposcope guided biopsy: a cut-point meta-analytic comparison.

Authors:  Edward R Cachay; Wollelaw Agmas; William C Mathews
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Assessment of Anal Cancer Screening Tools in Detecting High-Grade Anal Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions in Women.

Authors:  Jeslie M Ramos-Cartagena; Cynthia M Pérez; Humberto M Guiot; Claudia P Amaya-Ardilla; Maribel Tirado-Gómez; Ana P Ortiz
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.842

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.