Literature DB >> 20056928

Assessment and improvement of figures to visually convey benefit and risk of stroke thrombolysis.

Jigneshkumar Gadhia1, Sidney Starkman, Bruce Ovbiagele, Latisha Ali, David Liebeskind, Jeffrey L Saver.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Deciding whether to use intravenous fibrinolytic therapy for acute cerebral ischemia within 3 hours of onset is challenging for patients, family members, and health care providers. Visual displays can permit individuals to rapidly understand response patterns to therapy. This study sought to evaluate, refine, and improve existing visual aids for stroke fibrinolytic decision-making.
METHODS: Existing visual aids were identified by Medline search and querying of national guideline organizations, pharmaceutical manufacturers, and stroke specialists, and were rated on a formal 8-point quality rating scale (0, lowest; 8, highest). Based on available instruments, new visual displays were developed to improve informed decision-making in routine practice.
RESULTS: Two existing visual aids were identified, one from an emergency medicine society and one from a pharmaceutical company. Both were comparison visual displays of outcomes with and without treatment; no decision matrix visual aid was found. Both scored 4.0 on the quality scale, showing defects of effect size distortion, privileging less salient outcomes, dissimilar representation by treatment group, and limited stakeholder participation in generation. Revised versions of these graphics were developed with higher quality scores (6.75 and 7.75). In addition, a new decision matrix display with quality score 8.0 was developed that complements the numeric text of a national patient education tool developed jointly by US neurology, emergency medicine, and stroke patient organizations.
CONCLUSIONS: Existing visual aids for stroke fibrinolysis decision-making have deficiencies. New visual displays are now available to convey the health benefits and risks of fibrinolytic stroke therapy efficiently and informatively to patients and family members.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20056928      PMCID: PMC2909659          DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.566935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  13 in total

1.  Validity and interpretation of preference-based measures of health-related quality of life.

Authors:  L Lenert; R M Kaplan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: suggested best practices and future recommendations.

Authors:  Isaac M Lipkus
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke: the likelihood of being helped versus harmed.

Authors:  Bart M Demaerschalk
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 4.  Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales.

Authors:  Scott E Kasner
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 5.  Design features of graphs in health risk communication: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; Yalini Senathirajah; Rita Kukafka; Justin B Starren
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Annette O'Connor; Dawn Stacey; Robert Volk; Adrian Edwards; Angela Coulter; Richard Thomson; Alexandra Barratt; Michael Barry; Steven Bernstein; Phyllis Butow; Aileen Clarke; Vikki Entwistle; Deb Feldman-Stewart; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Nora Moumjid; Al Mulley; Cornelia Ruland; Karen Sepucha; Alan Sykes; Tim Whelan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-08-14

7.  Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-12-14       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Number needed to treat estimates incorporating effects over the entire range of clinical outcomes: novel derivation method and application to thrombolytic therapy for acute stroke.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Saver
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2004-07

9.  Hemorrhage after thrombolytic therapy for stroke: the clinically relevant number needed to harm.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Saver
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  The effect of alternative graphical displays used to present the benefits of antibiotics for sore throat on decisions about whether to seek treatment: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Cheryl L L Carling; Doris Tove Kristoffersen; Signe Flottorp; Atle Fretheim; Andrew D Oxman; Holger J Schünemann; Elie A Akl; Jeph Herrin; Thomas D MacKenzie; Victor M Montori
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  9 in total

1.  Testing the presumption of consent to emergency treatment for acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Winston Chiong; Anthony S Kim; Ivy A Huang; Nita A Farahany; S Andrew Josephson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014 Apr 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Optimal end points for acute stroke therapy trials: best ways to measure treatment effects of drugs and devices.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Saver
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Inability to consent does not diminish the desirability of stroke thrombolysis.

Authors:  Winston Chiong; Anthony S Kim; Ivy A Huang; Nita A Farahany; S Andrew Josephson
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 10.422

4.  Getting the Gist Across Is Enough for Informed Consent for Acute Stroke Thrombolytics.

Authors:  Lesli E Skolarus; Alison O'Brien; William J Meurer; Brian J Zikmund Fisher
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Thrombolytic Refusal Over Telestroke.

Authors:  Alicia Zha; Adriana Rosero; Rene Malazarte; Shima Bozorgui; Christy Ankrom; Liang Zhu; Michele Joseph; Alyssa Trevino; Tiffany D Cossey; Sean Savitz; Tzu Ching Wu; Amanda Jagolino-Cole
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2021-06

6.  Safety of thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a review of complications, risk factors, and newer technologies.

Authors:  Daniel J Miller; Jennifer R Simpson; Brian Silver
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2011-07

7.  Generalization of the Right Acute Stroke Prevention Strategies in Reducing in-Hospital Delays.

Authors:  Qiang Huang; Hai-Qing Song; Xun-Ming Ji; Wei-Yang Cheng; Juan Feng; Jian Wu; Qing-Feng Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  A review of decision support, risk communication and patient information tools for thrombolytic treatment in acute stroke: lessons for tool developers.

Authors:  Darren Flynn; Gary A Ford; Lynne Stobbart; Helen Rodgers; Madeleine J Murtagh; Richard G Thomson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Uncovering the Rosetta Stone: Report from the First Annual Conference on Key Elements in Translating Stroke Therapeutics from Pre-Clinical to Clinical.

Authors:  Gregory J Bix; Justin F Fraser; William J Mack; S Thomas Carmichael; Miguel Perez-Pinzon; Halina Offner; Lauren Sansing; Francesca Bosetti; Cenk Ayata; Keith R Pennypacker
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 6.829

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.