Literature DB >> 2005680

A report on extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy results on 1,569 renal units in an outpatient clinic.

M Tolon1, C Miroglu, H Erol, J Tolon, D Acar, E Bazmanoglu, A Erkan, S Amato.   

Abstract

We report our experience with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL*) treatment of 1,569 renal units in an outpatient clinic with a small focused piezoelectric lithotriptor. A stone-free rate of 93% was achieved. In 3.6% of the patients, mainly those with a history of surgery and/or anatomical caliceal deformations, fragments smaller than 3 mm. in diameter remained despite multiple ESWL sessions and intensive upside down physiotherapy. Of the cases 3.4%, including those without sufficient data, were considered unsuccessful. We treated 58 renal units in children 14 years old and younger, 55 patients had a single kidney and 7 had a horseshoe kidney.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2005680     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38427-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  13 in total

1.  Predictive value of low tube voltage and dual-energy CT for successful shock wave lithotripsy: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Remo Largo; Paul Stolzmann; Christian D Fankhauser; Cédric Poyet; Pirmin Wolfsgruber; Tullio Sulser; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Winklhofer
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy with minimal or no anesthesia.

Authors:  J N Kabalin
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1991-12

3.  Prognostic factors of success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of renal stones.

Authors:  Abdulla Al-Ansari; Khalid As-Sadiq; Sami Al-Said; Nagy Younis; Osama A Jaleel; Ahmed A Shokeir
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Variables influencing the likelihood of cardiac dysrhythmias during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Thomas A A Skinner; Richard W Norman
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy: comparison of surgical outcomes in relation to stone distribution within the kidney.

Authors:  Jeong Woo Lee; Sung Yong Cho; Jae-Seung Yeon; Min Young Jeong; Hwancheol Son; Hyeon Jeong; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Seung Bae Lee
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Comparison of efficacy and safety of shockwave lithotripsy for upper urinary tract stones of different locations in children: a study of 311 cases.

Authors:  Lei He; Xizhao Sun; Jianlin Lu; Xiaoming Cong; Huaijun Zhu; Luming Shen; Ying Wang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Calyceal stones: fate of shock wave therapy with respect to stone localization.

Authors:  A Koşar; K Türkölmez; K Sarica; Y Z Müftüoğlu; O Gögüş; K Aydos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Treatment outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones and predictive factors of stone-free.

Authors:  Soo Hyun Lim; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Deok Hyun Han
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-11-17

9.  [Outpatient extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Prospective evaluation of 2937 cases].

Authors:  P J Bastian; H-P Bastian
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 10.  Pediatric urolithiasis: review of research and current management.

Authors:  E P Harmon; D E Neal; R Thomas
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.