Literature DB >> 21153828

Comparison of efficacy and safety of shockwave lithotripsy for upper urinary tract stones of different locations in children: a study of 311 cases.

Lei He1, Xizhao Sun, Jianlin Lu, Xiaoming Cong, Huaijun Zhu, Luming Shen, Ying Wang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of Shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for upper urinary tract stones of various locations in children.
METHODS: Between 1997 and 2008, a total of 311 children (average age: 7.9 ± 4.4 years, ranged from 6 months to 16 years) with upper urinary tract stones were treated by SWL using Dornier Compact S lithotripter at our department. Of those patients, 196 had renal stones (pelvic, 53; upper and mid calices, 75; lower calices, 68) with an average size of 9.42 ± 7.1 mm, and 115 had ureteral stones (proximal, 53; mid, 16; distal, 46) with an average size of 7.38 ± 5.87 mm.
RESULTS: Overall stone-free rates of renal stones and ureteral stones at 3 months were 95.8% and 94.8% with 83.5% and 79.5% of efficacy quotient (EQ), respectively. In renal stone groups, the EQ for renal pelvic stones was 89.2%, for middle and upper calyx stones was 92.5%, which was higher than 71.9% for lower calices stones. In ureteral stone groups, the 82.3% of EQ for proximal ureteral stones and 83.0% for distal ureteral stones were higher than 63.6% for middle ureteral stones. Patients with larger stones had significant higher re-treatment rate (P < 0.05) and lower EQ than small stone groups. No serious side effect happened in the study.
CONCLUSIONS: SWL for both renal stones and ureteral stones in pediatric group have comparable efficacy and safety, except that stones in lower calices and middle ureters have lower EQ than those in other locations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21153828     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-010-0592-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  20 in total

1.  Impact of lower pole renal anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy: fact or fiction?

Authors:  K Madbouly; K Z Sheir; E Elsobky
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Strategies for managing upper tract calculi in young children.

Authors:  V R Jayanthi; P M Arnold; S A Koff
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Effects of shock waves on the rat ovary.

Authors:  D L McCullough; L D Yeaman; W J Bo; D G Assimos; R L Kroovand; A S Griffin; E G Furr
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Predictive factors of lower calyceal stone clearance after Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy (ESWL): a focus on the infundibulopelvic anatomy.

Authors:  Islam A Ghoneim; Ali M Ziada; Seif Eldin Elkatib
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Pediatric kidney: functional outcome after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  M C Goel; N S Baserge; R V Babu; S Sinha; R Kapoor
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is highly effective for ureteral calculi in children.

Authors:  E H Landau; O N Gofrit; A Shapiro; S Meretyk; G Katz; O Z Shenfeld; D Golijanin; D Pode
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteric stones in children.

Authors:  Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu; Ahmet Hamdi Tefekli; Fatih Altunrende; Mert Ali Karadag; Murat Baykal; Muzaffer Akcay
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in prepubertal children: 22-year experience at a single institution with a single lithotriptor.

Authors:  Ezekiel H Landau; Ofer Z Shenfeld; Dov Pode; Amos Shapiro; Shimon Meretyk; Giora Katz; Ran Katz; Mordechai Duvdevani; Benjamin Hardak; Helio Cipele; Guy Hidas; Vladimir Yutkin; Ofer N Gofrit
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as first line treatment alternative for urinary tract stones in children: a large scale retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu; Ahmet Tefekli; Omer Sarilar; Murat Binbay; Faith Altunrende; Unsal Ozkuvanci
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in pediatrics.

Authors:  Alessandro D'Addessi; Luca Bongiovanni; Francesco Sasso; Gaetano Gulino; Roberto Falabella; Pierfrancesco Bassi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  3 in total

1.  Is mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy a safe alternative to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in pediatric age group in borderline stones? a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Ahmed Farouk; Ahmed Tawfick; Mohamed Shoeb; Mahmoud A Mahmoud; Diaa Eldin Mostafa; Mohamed Hasan; Hany M Abdalla
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Factors affecting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for unilateral urinary stones in children: a 17-year single-institute experience.

Authors:  U-Seok Jeong; Sinwoo Lee; Junghun Kang; Deok Hyun Han; Kwan Hyun Park; Minki Baek
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-07-15

3.  What is the optimal frequency in shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric renal stones? A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Murat Tuncer; Alper Kafkaslı; Utku Can; Alper Çoşkun; Bilal Eryıldırım; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.436

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.