Literature DB >> 20055815

A meta-analysis of dispersal in butterflies.

Virginie M Stevens1, Camille Turlure, Michel Baguette.   

Abstract

Dispersal has recently gained much attention because of its crucial role in the conservation and evolution of species facing major environmental changes such as habitat loss and fragmentation, climate change, and their interactions. Butterflies have long been recognized as ideal model systems for the study of dispersal and a huge amount of data on their ability to disperse has been collected under various conditions. However, no single 'best' method seems to exist leading to the co-occurrence of various approaches to study butterfly mobility, and therefore a high heterogeneity among data on dispersal across this group. Accordingly, we here reviewed the knowledge accumulated on dispersal and mobility in butterflies, to detect general patterns. This meta-analysis specifically addressed two questions. Firstly, do the various methods provide a congruent picture of how dispersal ability is distributed across species? Secondly, is dispersal species-specific? Five sources of data were analysed: multisite mark-recapture experiments, genetic studies, experimental assessments, expert opinions, and transect surveys. We accounted for potential biases due to variation in genetic markers, sample sizes, spatial scales or the level of habitat fragmentation. We showed that the various dispersal estimates generally converged, and that the relative dispersal ability of species could reliably be predicted from their relative vagrancy (records of butterflies outside their normal habitat). Expert opinions gave much less reliable estimates of realized dispersal but instead reflected migration propensity of butterflies. Within-species comparisons showed that genetic estimates were relatively invariable, while other dispersal estimates were highly variable. This latter point questions dispersal as a species-specific, invariant trait.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20055815     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00119.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  34 in total

1.  Dispersal traits may reflect dispersal distances, but dispersers may not connect populations demographically.

Authors:  Jill Lancaster; Barbara J Downes
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Should I Stay or Should I Go: Partially Sedentary Populations Can Outperform Fully Dispersing Populations in Response to Climate-Induced Range Shifts.

Authors:  Christina A Cobbold; Remus Stana
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 1.758

3.  Urban moth communities suggest that life in the city favours thermophilic multi-dimensional generalists.

Authors:  Markus Franzén; Per-Eric Betzholtz; Lars B Pettersson; Anders Forsman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Evidence for positive density-dependent emigration in butterfly metapopulations.

Authors:  Piotr Nowicki; Vladimir Vrabec
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Variation within and between closely related species uncovers high intra-specific variability in dispersal.

Authors:  Virginie M Stevens; Sandrine Pavoine; Michel Baguette
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Weather explains high annual variation in butterfly dispersal.

Authors:  Mikko Kuussaari; Susu Rytteri; Risto K Heikkinen; Janne Heliölä; Peter von Bagh
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Nectar resource limitation affects butterfly flight performance and metabolism differently in intensive and extensive agricultural landscapes.

Authors:  Julie Lebeau; Renate A Wesselingh; Hans Van Dyck
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Habitat fragmentation impacts mobility in a common and widespread woodland butterfly: do sexes respond differently?

Authors:  Benjamin Bergerot; Thomas Merckx; Hans Van Dyck; Michel Baguette
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 2.964

9.  Selection on the wing in Heliconius butterflies.

Authors:  Delphine Legrand; Virginie M Stevens; Michel Baguette
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 2.797

10.  Dispersal syndromes and the use of life-histories to predict dispersal.

Authors:  Virginie M Stevens; Audrey Trochet; Simon Blanchet; Sylvain Moulherat; Jean Clobert; Michel Baguette
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 5.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.