Literature DB >> 20055809

Pathological and clinical characterization of the 'troubled transplant': data from the DeKAF study.

S Gourishankar1, R Leduc, J Connett, J M Cecka, F Cosio, A Fieberg, R Gaston, P Halloran, L Hunsicker, B Kasiske, D Rush, J Grande, R Mannon, A Matas.   

Abstract

We are studying two cohorts of kidney transplant recipients, with the goal of defining specific clinicopathologic entities that cause late graft dysfunction: (1) prevalent patients with new onset late graft dysfunction (cross-sectional cohort); and (2) newly transplanted patients (prospective cohort). For the cross-sectional cohort (n = 440), mean time from transplant to biopsy was 7.5 +/- 6.1 years. Local pathology diagnoses included CAN (48%), CNI toxicity (30%), and perhaps surprisingly, acute rejection (cellular- or Ab-mediated) (23%). Actuarial rate of death-censored graft loss at 1 year postbiopsy was 17.7%; at 2 years, 29.8%. There was no difference in postbiopsy graft survival for recipients with versus without CAN (p = 0.9). Prospective cohort patients (n = 2427) developing graft dysfunction >3 months posttransplant undergo 'index' biopsy. The rate of index biopsy was 8.8% between 3 and 12 months, and 18.2% by 2 years. Mean time from transplant to index biopsy was 1.0 +/- 0.6 years. Local pathology diagnoses included CAN (27%), and acute rejection (39%). Intervention to halt late graft deterioration cannot be developed in the absence of meaningful diagnostic entities. We found CAN in late posttransplant biopsies to be of no prognostic value. The DeKAF study will provide broadly applicable diagnostic information to serve as the basis for future trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20055809      PMCID: PMC3538367          DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02954.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  14 in total

1.  Post-transplant renal function in the first year predicts long-term kidney transplant survival.

Authors:  Sundaram Hariharan; Maureen A McBride; Wida S Cherikh; Christine B Tolleris; Barbara A Bresnahan; Christopher P Johnson
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.612

2.  The change in allograft function among long-term kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  John S Gill; Marcello Tonelli; Christian H Mix; Brian J G Pereira
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 10.121

3.  The stability of the glomerular filtration rate after renal transplantation is improving.

Authors:  Sita Gourishankar; Lawrence G Hunsicker; Gian S Jhangri; Sandra M Cockfield; Philip F Halloran
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  Lack of improvement in renal allograft survival despite a marked decrease in acute rejection rates over the most recent era.

Authors:  Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche; Jesse D Schold; Titte R Srinivas; Bruce Kaplan
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Scoring total inflammation is superior to the current Banff inflammation score in predicting outcome and the degree of molecular disturbance in renal allografts.

Authors:  M Mengel; J Reeve; S Bunnag; G Einecke; G S Jhangri; B Sis; K Famulski; L Guembes-Hidalgo; P F Halloran
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Absence of deleterious effect on long-term kidney graft survival of rejection episodes with complete functional recovery.

Authors:  P Vereerstraeten; D Abramowicz; L de Pauw; P Kinnaert
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1997-06-27       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Completely reversed acute rejection is not a significant risk factor for the development of chronic rejection in renal allograft recipients.

Authors:  R L Madden; J G Mulhern; B J Benedetto; M H O'Shea; M J Germain; G L Braden; J O'Shaughnessy; G S Lipkowitz
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.782

8.  Decreased acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients is associated with decreased chronic rejection.

Authors:  A J Matas; A Humar; W D Payne; K J Gillingham; D L Dunn; D E Sutherland; J S Najarian
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Improved graft survival after renal transplantation in the United States, 1988 to 1996.

Authors:  S Hariharan; C P Johnson; B A Bresnahan; S E Taranto; M J McIntosh; D Stablein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-03-02       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology.

Authors:  L C Racusen; K Solez; R B Colvin; S M Bonsib; M C Castro; T Cavallo; B P Croker; A J Demetris; C B Drachenberg; A B Fogo; P Furness; L W Gaber; I W Gibson; D Glotz; J C Goldberg; J Grande; P F Halloran; H E Hansen; B Hartley; P J Hayry; C M Hill; E O Hoffman; L G Hunsicker; A S Lindblad; Y Yamaguchi
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 10.612

View more
  36 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up of the DeKAF cross-sectional cohort study.

Authors:  Arthur J Matas; Ann Fieberg; Roslyn B Mannon; Robert Leduc; Joe Grande; Bertram L Kasiske; Michael Cecka; Robert Gaston; Lawrence Hunsicker; John Connett; Fernando Cosio; Sita Gourishankar; David Rush
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Clinical utility of complement-dependent C3d assay in kidney recipients presenting with late allograft dysfunction.

Authors:  James H Lan; David Gjertson; Ying Zheng; Stephanie Clark; Elaine F Reed; Michael J Cecka
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 3.  Is it time to give up with calcineurin inhibitors in kidney transplantation?

Authors:  Maurizio Salvadori; Elisabetta Bertoni
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2013-06-24

4.  Begin at the Beginning to Prevent the End.

Authors:  Peter W Nickerson; David N Rush
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 5.  Biomarkers and Pharmacogenomics in Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  L E Crowley; M Mekki; S Chand
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 6.  Chronic allograft rejection: a fresh look.

Authors:  Johannes Wedel; Sarah Bruneau; Nora Kochupurakkal; Leo Boneschansker; David M Briscoe
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.640

7.  A case of late kidney allograft failure: a clinical pathological conference from American Society of Nephrology Kidney Week 2011.

Authors:  Parmjeet Randhawa; Roslyn B Mannon
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Novel polymorphisms associated with tacrolimus trough concentrations: results from a multicenter kidney transplant consortium.

Authors:  Pamala A Jacobson; William S Oetting; Ann M Brearley; Robert Leduc; Weihau Guan; David Schladt; Arthur J Matas; Vishal Lamba; Bruce A Julian; Rosalyn B Mannon; Ajay Israni
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 9.  The importance of non-HLA antibodies in transplantation.

Authors:  Qiuheng Zhang; Elaine F Reed
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 10.  Calcineurin inhibitor sparing strategies in renal transplantation, part one: Late sparing strategies.

Authors:  Andrew Scott Mathis; Gwen Egloff; Hoytin Lee Ghin
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.