Literature DB >> 12937318

The stability of the glomerular filtration rate after renal transplantation is improving.

Sita Gourishankar1, Lawrence G Hunsicker, Gian S Jhangri, Sandra M Cockfield, Philip F Halloran.   

Abstract

The 6-mo function and the stability of function posttransplantation in 429 cadaver renal transplants was investigated from 1990 to 2000. The 6-mo creatinine clearance (CrCl) and the rate of change of CrCl beyond 6 mo posttransplantation were calculated. The mean 6-mo CrCl was 64.6 +/- 1.1 ml/min and was stable between 1990 and 2000. The net slope of CrCl was -1.4 +/- 0.5 ml/min per yr. The slope has improved in recent years, such that the mean slopes in the period after 1997 are actually positive (+3.5 ml/min per yr). The slope of CrCl beyond 6 mo was not related to the actual value of the 6 mo CrCl, i.e., there was no accelerated loss of function at low CrCl levels. The 6-mo CrCl was independently determined by donor factors (age, gender), recipient factors (age, gender), and immune factors (rejection episodes, regraft status). The slope of the CrCl correlated independently with the transplant year, recipient gender, rejection episodes, diastolic BP, and the choice of immunosuppressive drugs. Cytomegalovirus infection and mismatch status and lipid levels and treatment were not independently associated with slope or 6-mo CrCl. Thus, the most striking change in the course of renal transplants over the past decade is the new stability of function, correlating with reduced rejection and probably due at least in part to the new immunosuppressive agents. Despite continued calcineurin inhibitor use, late improvement in function now occurs in many cadaver kidney transplants, suggesting a previously unappreciated capacity for functional adaptation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12937318     DOI: 10.1097/01.asn.0000085019.95339.f0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  14 in total

1.  Metformin use in the first year after kidney transplant, correlates, and associated outcomes in diabetic transplant recipients: A retrospective analysis of integrated registry and pharmacy claims data.

Authors:  L S Vest; F M Koraishy; Z Zhang; N N Lam; M A Schnitzler; V R Dharnidharka; D Axelrod; A S Naik; T A Alhamad; B L Kasiske; G P Hess; K L Lentine
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 2.863

2.  Complement Dependence of Murine Costimulatory Blockade-Resistant Cellular Cardiac Allograft Rejection.

Authors:  N Chun; R L Fairchild; Y Li; J Liu; M Zhang; W M Baldwin; P S Heeger
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Understanding Trends in Kidney Function 1 Year after Kidney Transplant in the United States.

Authors:  Yihung Huang; Anca Tilea; Brenda Gillespie; Vahakn Shahinian; Tanushree Banerjee; Vanessa Grubbs; Neil Powe; Nilka Rios-Burrows; Meda Pavkov; Rajiv Saran
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 4.  Combating chronic renal allograft dysfunction : optimal immunosuppressive regimens.

Authors:  Pierre Merville
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Pathological and clinical characterization of the 'troubled transplant': data from the DeKAF study.

Authors:  S Gourishankar; R Leduc; J Connett; J M Cecka; F Cosio; A Fieberg; R Gaston; P Halloran; L Hunsicker; B Kasiske; D Rush; J Grande; R Mannon; A Matas
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Long-term graft function changes in kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Roberto Marcén; José María Morales; Ana Fernández-Rodriguez; Luis Capdevila; Luis Pallardó; Juan José Plaza; Juan José Cubero; Josep María Puig; Ana Sanchez-Fructuoso; Manual Arias; Gabriela Alperovich; Daniel Serón
Journal:  NDT Plus       Date:  2010-06

7.  Identification and characterization of kidney transplants with good glomerular filtration rate at 1 year but subsequent progressive loss of renal function.

Authors:  Walter D Park; Timothy S Larson; Matthew D Griffin; Mark D Stegall
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Micophenolat Mofetil versus Azathioprine: effects on renal graft function in early posttransplant period.

Authors:  Farid Ljuca; Semir Imamović; Deso Mesić; Sefik Hasukić Hasukić; Safet Omerović; Mustafa Bazardzanović; Fatima Iljazagić-Halilović
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.363

9.  Does the KDIGO CKD risk stratification based on GFR and proteinuria predict kidney graft failure?

Authors:  Cristina Bucşa; Gabriel Stefan; Dorina Tacu; Ioanel Sinescu; Ruxandra Diana Sinescu; Mihai Hârza
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Cellular senescence limits regenerative capacity and allograft survival.

Authors:  Heidi Braun; Bernhard M W Schmidt; Mirja Raiss; Arpita Baisantry; Dan Mircea-Constantin; Shijun Wang; Marie-Luise Gross; Manuel Serrano; Roland Schmitt; Anette Melk
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 10.121

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.