Literature DB >> 20055650

Meta-analysis of the effects of triazole-based fungicides on wheat yield and test weight as influenced by Fusarium head blight intensity.

P A Paul1, M P McMullen, D E Hershman, L V Madden.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT Multivariate random-effects meta-analyses were conducted on 12 years of data from 14 U.S. states to determine the mean yield and test-weight responses of wheat to treatment with propiconazole, prothioconazole, tebuconazole, metconazole, and prothioconazole+tebuconazole. All fungicides led to a significant increase in mean yield and test weight relative to the check (D; P < 0.001). Metconazole resulted in the highest overall yield increase, with a D of 450 kg/ha, followed by prothioconazole+ tebuconazole (444.5 kg/ha), prothioconazole (419.1 kg/ha), tebuconazole (272.6 kg/ha), and propiconazole (199.6 kg/ha). Metconazole, prothioconazole+tebuconazole, and prothioconazole also resulted in the highest increases in test weight, with D values of 17.4 to 19.4 kg/m(3), respectively. On a relative scale, the best three fungicides resulted in an overall 13.8 to 15.0% increase in yield but only a 2.5 to 2.8% increase in test weight. Except for prothioconazole+tebuconazole, wheat type significantly affected the yield response to treatment; depending on the fungicide, D was 110.0 to 163.7 kg/ha higher in spring than in soft-red winter wheat. Fusarium head blight (FHB) disease index (field or plot-level severity) in the untreated check plots, a measure of the risk of disease development in a study, had a significant effect on the yield response to treatment, in that D increased with increasing FHB index. The probability was estimated that fungicide treatment in a randomly selected study will result in a positive yield increase (p(+)) and increases of at least 250 and 500 kg/ha (p(250) and p(500), respectively). For the three most effective fungicide treatments (metconazole, prothioconazole+tebuconazole, and prothioconazole) at the higher selected FHB index, p(+) was very large (e.g., >/=0.99 for both wheat types) but p(500) was considerably lower (e.g., 0.78 to 0.92 for spring and 0.54 to 0.68 for soft-red winter wheat); at the lower FHB index, p(500) for the same three fungicides was 0.34 to 0.36 for spring and only 0.09 to 0.23 for soft-red winter wheat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20055650     DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO-100-2-0160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phytopathology        ISSN: 0031-949X            Impact factor:   4.025


  11 in total

1.  Potential and limits of whole genome prediction of resistance to Fusarium head blight and Septoria tritici blotch in a vast Central European elite winter wheat population.

Authors:  Vilson Mirdita; Sang He; Yusheng Zhao; Viktor Korzun; Reiner Bothe; Erhard Ebmeyer; Jochen C Reif; Yong Jiang
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 2.  Fungicide Resistance in Fusarium graminearum Species Complex.

Authors:  Magda Antunes de Chaves; Paula Reginatto; Bárbara Souza da Costa; Ricardo Itiki de Paschoal; Mário Lettieri Teixeira; Alexandre Meneghello Fuentefria
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Predicting plant disease epidemics from functionally represented weather series.

Authors:  D A Shah; P A Paul; E D De Wolf; L V Madden
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Validating the prediction accuracies of marker-assisted and genomic selection of Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat using an independent sample.

Authors:  Yong Jiang; Albert Wilhelm Schulthess; Bernd Rodemann; Jie Ling; Jörg Plieske; Sonja Kollers; Erhard Ebmeyer; Viktor Korzun; Odile Argillier; Gunther Stiewe; Martin W Ganal; Marion S Röder; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Role of fungicides, application of nozzle types, and the resistance level of wheat varieties in the control of Fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol.

Authors:  Akos Mesterházy; Beáta Tóth; Monika Varga; Tibor Bartók; Agnes Szabó-Hevér; László Farády; Szabolcs Lehoczki-Krsjak
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.546

6.  Optimization of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BLB369 Culture Medium by Response Surface Methodology for Low Cost Production of Antifungal Activity.

Authors:  Imen Zalila-Kolsi; Sameh Kessentini; Slim Tounsi; Kaïs Jamoussi
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-04-16

7.  Meta-analysis of yield response of foliar fungicide-treated hybrid corn in the United States and Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Kiersten A Wise; Damon Smith; Anna Freije; Daren S Mueller; Yuba Kandel; Tom Allen; Carl A Bradley; Emmanuel Byamukama; Martin Chilvers; Travis Faske; Andrew Friskop; Clayton Hollier; Tamra A Jackson-Ziems; Heather Kelly; Bob Kemerait; Paul Price; Alison Robertson; Albert Tenuta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Resistance-Related l-Pyroglutamic Acid Affects the Biosynthesis of Trichothecenes and Phenylpropanoids by F. graminearum Sensu Stricto.

Authors:  Katarzyna Bilska; Kinga Stuper-Szablewska; Tomasz Kulik; Maciej Buśko; Dariusz Załuski; Juliusz Perkowski
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-24       Impact factor: 4.546

9.  Effects of cultivar resistances and chemical seed treatments on fusarium head blight and bread wheat yield-related parameters under field condition in southern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Getachew Gudero Mengesha; Shiferaw Mekonnen Abebe; Asaminew Amare Mekonnen; Abate G/Mikael Esho; Zerhun Tomas Lera; Misgana Mitku Shertore; Kedir Bamud Fedilu; Yosef Berihun Tadesse; Yisahak Tsegaye Tsakamo; Bilal Temmam Issa; Dizgo Chencha Cheleko; Agdew Bekele W/Silassie
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-12-24

10.  Identification of ABC transporter genes of Fusarium graminearum with roles in azole tolerance and/or virulence.

Authors:  Ghada Abou Ammar; Reno Tryono; Katharina Döll; Petr Karlovsky; Holger B Deising; Stefan G R Wirsel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.