Literature DB >> 20054958

Results of lumbosacral distraction spondylodesis for the treatment of spondylolisthesis, failed-back syndrome, and lumbar instability.

J Möller1, R H Wittenberg, L P Nolte, M Jergas, R Willburger, J Krämer.   

Abstract

Various methods of lumbosacral fusions for the treatment of degenerative spinal diseases are used clinically. Results vary greatly depending on indication, type of fusion, implants, and method of evaluation. In a retrospective clinical and radiological examination after an average follow-up time of 3.9 years this study reports on the outcome of lumbosacral distraction spondylodesis (LSDS) in a consecutive series of 147 patients being fused for the treatment of spondylolisthesis, failed-back syndrome, or lumbar instability. LSDS consists of a posterolateral fusion together with an autologous corticocancellous H-graft wedged under distraction between the spinous processes of L4 and S1. With 81.0% good and excellent results this noninstrumented fusion technique showed the best outcome in patients with spondylolisthesis, while in cases with a failed-back syndrome or lumbar instability only 62.3% excellent to satisfying outcomes were noted. The rate of pseudarthrosis was 13.6% in the whole patient group; no major complications such as nerve root damage, postoperative neurological deficits, or spinal stenosis were found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 20054958     DOI: 10.1007/bf00300938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  19 in total

1.  Posterolateral bonegrafting for fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine.

Authors:  M B WATKINS
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Multiple operations for protruded lumbar intervertebral disk.

Authors:  J H KELLEY; D C VORIS; H J SVIEN; R K GHORMLEY
Journal:  Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin       Date:  1954-09-29

3.  [Mechanical principle of external fixation for dorsal stabilization of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae].

Authors:  P Kluger; H J Gerner
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie       Date:  1986-04

4.  Anterior interbody lumbar spine fusion. Analysis of Mayo Clinic series.

Authors:  R N Stauffer; M B Coventry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine.

Authors:  L L Wiltse; J G Bateman; R H Hutchinson; W E Nelson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Lumbosacral distraction spondylodesis with autologous bone graft together with posterolateral fusion.

Authors:  J Krämer; D Kolditz; R Schleberger
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1984

7.  Lumbosacral spinal fusion. A biomechanical study.

Authors:  C K Lee; N A Langrana
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The "fixateur interne" as a versatile implant for spine surgery.

Authors:  W Dick
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Internal fixation of the lumbar spine with pedicle screw plating.

Authors:  R Roy-Camille; G Saillant; C Mazel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Treatment of spondylolisthesis by posterolateral fusion, resection of the pars interarticularis, and prompt mobilization of the patient. An end-result study of seventy-three patients.

Authors:  C Rombold
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1966-10       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinical efficacy of pedicle instrumentation and posterolateral fusion in the symptomatic degenerative lumbar spine.

Authors:  J D Rompe; P Eysel; C Hopf
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.