Literature DB >> 20053950

Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Stroke Impact Scale in stroke patients.

Keh-chung Lin1, Tiffany Fu, Ching-yi Wu, Yen-ho Wang, Jung-sen Liu, Ching-ju Hsieh, Shih-fan Lin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to establish the minimal detectable change (MDC) and clinically important differences (CIDs) of the physical domains of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) and to assess the proportions of patients' change scores exceeding the MDC and CIDs after stroke rehabilitation.
METHODS: Seventy-four patients received 1 of 3 treatments for 3 weeks and underwent clinical assessment before and after treatment. The MDC was calculated from the standard error of measurement to indicate a real change with 95% confidence for individual patients (MDC(95)). Anchor-based and distribution-based approaches were adopted to triangulate the ranges of minimal CIDs. The percentage of patients exceeding MDC(95) and minimal CIDs were also calculated.
RESULTS: The MDC(95) of the strength, activities of daily living/instrumental activities of daily living, mobility, and hand function subscales were 24.0, 17.3, 15.1, and 25.9, respectively. The respective minimal CIDs for these 4 subscales were 9.2, 5.9, 4.5, and 17.8 points, respectively, and the MDC(95) and CID proportions were 14% to 43%, 16% to 49%, 10% to 50%, and 23% to 64%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The change score of an individual patient has to reach 24.0, 17.3, 15.1, and 25.9 on the 4 subscales to indicate a true change. The mean change scores of a stroke group on the 4 subscales should reach 9.2, 5.9, 4.5, and 17.8 points to be regarded as clinically important changes. Future research with larger sample sizes is warranted to validate these estimates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20053950     DOI: 10.1177/1545968309356295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  47 in total

1.  Reliability and validity of bilateral ankle accelerometer algorithms for activity recognition and walking speed after stroke.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin; Xiaoyu Xu; Maxim Batalin; Seth Thomas; William Kaiser
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Minimal detectable change of the actual amount of use test and the motor activity log: the EXCITE Trial.

Authors:  Shuya Chen; Steven L Wolf; Qin Zhang; Paul A Thompson; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 3.  Functional recovery following stroke: capturing changes in upper-extremity function.

Authors:  Lisa A Simpson; Janice J Eng
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 4.  The promise of mHealth: daily activity monitoring and outcome assessments by wearable sensors.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin; Andrew Dorsch
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  The Interface of Clinical Decision-Making With Study Protocols for Knowledge Translation From a Walking Recovery Trial.

Authors:  Julie A Hershberg; Dorian K Rose; Julie K Tilson; Bettina Brutsch; Anita Correa; Joann Gallichio; Molly McLeod; Craig Moore; Sam Wu; Pamela W Duncan; Andrea L Behrman
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.649

6.  Body-weight-supported treadmill rehabilitation after stroke.

Authors:  Pamela W Duncan; Katherine J Sullivan; Andrea L Behrman; Stanley P Azen; Samuel S Wu; Stephen E Nadeau; Bruce H Dobkin; Dorian K Rose; Julie K Tilson; Steven Cen; Sarah K Hayden
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Prediction of responders for outcome measures of locomotor Experience Applied Post Stroke trial.

Authors:  Bruce H K Dobkin; Stephen E Nadeau; Andrea L Behrman; Samuel S Wu; Dorian K Rose; Mark Bowden; Stephanie Studenski; Xiaomin Lu; Pamela W Duncan
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2014

8.  A psychometric evaluation of the Arm Motor Ability Test.

Authors:  Michael W O'Dell; Grace Kim; Lisa Rivera; Robert Fieo; Paul Christos; Caitlin Polistena; Kerri Fitzgerald; Delia Gorga
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  The home stroke rehabilitation and monitoring system trial: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Susan M Linder; Anson B Rosenfeldt; Aimee Reiss; Sharon Buchanan; Komal Sahu; Curtis R Bay; Steven L Wolf; Jay L Alberts
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.266

10.  Incorporating robotic-assisted telerehabilitation in a home program to improve arm function following stroke.

Authors:  Susan M Linder; Aimee Reiss; Sharon Buchanan; Komal Sahu; Anson B Rosenfeldt; Cindy Clark; Steven L Wolf; Jay L Alberts
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.