Literature DB >> 27977522

The Interface of Clinical Decision-Making With Study Protocols for Knowledge Translation From a Walking Recovery Trial.

Julie A Hershberg1, Dorian K Rose, Julie K Tilson, Bettina Brutsch, Anita Correa, Joann Gallichio, Molly McLeod, Craig Moore, Sam Wu, Pamela W Duncan, Andrea L Behrman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Despite efforts to translate knowledge into clinical practice, barriers often arise in adapting the strict protocols of a randomized, controlled trial (RCT) to the individual patient. The Locomotor Experience Applied Post-Stroke (LEAPS) RCT demonstrated equal effectiveness of 2 intervention protocols for walking recovery poststroke; both protocols were more effective than usual care physical therapy. The purpose of this article was to provide knowledge-translation tools to facilitate implementation of the LEAPS RCT protocols into clinical practice.
METHODS: Participants from 2 of the trial's intervention arms: (1) early Locomotor Training Program (LTP) and (2) Home Exercise Program (HEP) were chosen for case presentation. The two cases illustrate how the protocols are used in synergy with individual patient presentations and clinical expertise. Decision algorithms and guidelines for progression represent the interface between implementation of an RCT standardized intervention protocol and clinical decision-making. OUTCOMES: In each case, the participant presents with a distinct clinical challenge that the therapist addresses by integrating the participant's unique presentation with the therapist's expertise while maintaining fidelity to the LEAPS protocol. Both participants progressed through an increasingly challenging intervention despite their own unique presentation.
SUMMARY: Decision algorithms and exercise progression for the LTP and HEP protocols facilitate translation of the RCT protocol to the real world of clinical practice. The two case examples to facilitate translation of the LEAPS RCT into clinical practice by enhancing understanding of the protocols, their progression, and their application to individual participants.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A147).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27977522      PMCID: PMC5161105          DOI: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther        ISSN: 1557-0576            Impact factor:   3.649


  24 in total

1.  Locomotor training progression and outcomes after incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Andrea L Behrman; Anna R Lawless-Dixon; Sandra B Davis; Mark G Bowden; Preeti Nair; Chetan Phadke; Elizabeth M Hannold; Prudence Plummer; Susan J Harkema
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2005-12

Review 2.  Key characteristics of knowledge transfer and exchange in healthcare: integrative literature review.

Authors:  Duncan Pentland; Kirsty Forsyth; Donald Maciver; Mike Walsh; Richard Murray; Linda Irvine; Simon Sikora
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 3.187

3.  Body-weight-supported treadmill rehabilitation after stroke.

Authors:  Pamela W Duncan; Katherine J Sullivan; Andrea L Behrman; Stanley P Azen; Samuel S Wu; Stephen E Nadeau; Bruce H Dobkin; Dorian K Rose; Julie K Tilson; Steven Cen; Sarah K Hayden
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Single and interacting QTLs for cholesterol gallstones revealed in an intercross between mouse strains NZB and SM.

Authors:  Malcolm A Lyons; Ron Korstanje; Renhua Li; Susan M Sheehan; Kenneth A Walsh; Jarod A Rollins; Martin C Carey; Beverly Paigen; Gary A Churchill
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change.

Authors:  P W Duncan; D Wallace; S M Lai; D Johnson; S Embretson; L J Laster
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 6.  Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention; the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the Stroke Council.

Authors:  Neil F Gordon; Meg Gulanick; Fernando Costa; Gerald Fletcher; Barry A Franklin; Elliot J Roth; Tim Shephard
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion.

Authors:  G A Borg
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Physical therapists' experiences updating the clinical management of walking rehabilitation after stroke: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Nancy M Salbach; Paula Veinot; Susan Rappolt; Mark Bayley; Dawn Burnett; Maria Judd; Susan B Jaglal
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2009-04-16

9.  Long-term morbidities in stroke survivors: a prospective multicenter study of Thai stroke rehabilitation registry.

Authors:  Vilai Kuptniratsaikul; Apichana Kovindha; Sumalee Suethanapornkul; Nuttaset Manimmanakorn; Yingsumal Archongka
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.921

10.  Protocol for the Locomotor Experience Applied Post-stroke (LEAPS) trial: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Pamela W Duncan; Katherine J Sullivan; Andrea L Behrman; Stanley P Azen; Samuel S Wu; Stephen E Nadeau; Bruce H Dobkin; Dorian K Rose; Julie K Tilson
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 2.474

View more
  1 in total

1.  Lessons Learned: The Difficulties of Incorporating Intensity Principles Into Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Mark G Bowden; Eric D Monsch; Addie Middleton; Chris Daughtry; Troy Powell; Sara V Kraft
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2020-04-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.