Literature DB >> 20053718

Continuous forces are more effective than intermittent forces in expanding sutures.

Sean Shih-Yao Liu1, Hee-Moon Kyung, Peter H Buschang.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: While both intermittent and continuous forces are commonly used to expand sutures, it remains unclear which force is most effective. Using nickel-titanium (NiTi) open coil springs (50 g) and 3 mm long miniscrew implants (MSIs) for skeletal anchorage, intermittent and continuous forces were used to expand the midsagittal sutures in 18 New Zealand white juvenile male rabbits, 11 weeks of age, for 29 days. In the intermittent group, expansion forces of 50 g were delivered for 5 days (on) and paused for 1 day (off); the on/off cycles were repeated five times. Expansion forces of 50 g were delivered for 29 consecutive days in the continuous group. Longitudinal biometric and histomorphometric analyses were performed to evaluate sutural separation and bone formation using implanted tantalum bone markers and fluorescent bone labelling, respectively. Multilevel modelling procedures were undertaken to compare the groups and time intervals. Continuous forces produced significantly greater overall sutural separation (1.3 mm) than intermittent forces (0.8 mm). Although they were delivered over a period of time 86 per cent as long, intermittent forces produced only 61 per cent of the sutural separation of continuous forces. Between days 7 and 17, continuous forces resulted in significantly greater mineral apposition and bone formation rates than intermittent forces. Intermittent forces produced approximately 59 per cent as much mineral apposition and 61 per cent as much bone formation as continuous forces. Due to greater sutural separation and bone formation, continuous forces provide a more effective approach for separating sutures than intermittent forces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20053718     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjp103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of BALP, CTX-I, and IL-4 levels around miniscrew implants during orthodontic tooth movement between two different amounts of force.

Authors:  Mine Gecgelen Cesur; V Ozgen Ozturk; Beral Afacan; F Burcu Sirin; Afra Alkan; Torun Ozer
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Maxillary expansion in an animal model with light, continuous force.

Authors:  Achint Utreja; Carol Bain; Brett Turek; Robert Holland; Rawan AlRasheed; Parand Sorkhdini; W Eugene Roberts
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Is there an optimal initial amount of activation for midpalatal suture expansion? : A histomorphometric and immunohistochemical study in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Akram S Alyessary; Adrian U Yap; Siti A Othman; Mohammad T Rahman; N M Al-Namnam; Zamri Radzi
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Effects of screw and host factors on insertion torque and pullout strength.

Authors:  Ankit H Shah; Rolf G Behrents; Ki Beom Kim; Hee-Moon Kyung; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles Facilitate Osteoblast Differentiation and Bone Formation Within Sagittal Suture During Expansion in Rats.

Authors:  Wei Liang; Pengbing Ding; Guan Li; Enhang Lu; Zhenmin Zhao
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.162

6.  Stretch force guides finger-like pattern of bone formation in suture.

Authors:  Bo-Hai Wu; Xiao-Xing Kou; Ci Zhang; Yi-Mei Zhang; Zhen Cui; Xue-Dong Wang; Yan Liu; Da-Wei Liu; Yan-Heng Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Application of Multilevel Models in Dentistry.

Authors:  Mohammad Javad Kharazifard; Kurosh Holakouie-Naieni; Mohammad Ali Mansournia
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2017-11

8.  The difference of stress distribution of maxillary expansion using rapid maxillary expander (RME) and maxillary skeletal expander (MSE)-a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Nathania Hartono; Benny M Soegiharto; Retno Widayati
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.750

9.  Effect of high-frequency vibration on orthodontic tooth movement and bone density.

Authors:  Thomas Shipley; Khaled Farouk; Tarek El-Bialy
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2019-08-08

10.  Observational Study Regarding Possible Side Effects of Miniscrew-Assisted Rapid Palatal Expander (MARPE) with or without the Use of Corticopuncture Therapy.

Authors:  Eugen Silviu Bud; Cristina Ioana Bică; Mariana Păcurar; Petru Vaida; Alexandru Vlasa; Krisztina Martha; Anamaria Bud
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.