Literature DB >> 2005323

Honeybee venom allergy: results of a sting challenge 1 year after stopping successful venom immunotherapy in 86 patients.

U Müller1, E Berchtold, A Helbling.   

Abstract

In 86 patients with a history of severe systemic reactions (SRs) to honeybee stings confirmed by a positive skin test and/or RAST to honeybee venom (HBV), immunotherapy (IT) with HBV was stopped after 3 to 10 years. All patients had tolerated well a honeybee sting during IT and were resubmitted to a sting 1 year after VIT was stopped. At the latter time, 15 patients (17%) developed an SR and 71 did not. There was no difference between the two groups regarding age, sex, IT duration, severity of the SR before treatment, as well as diagnostic tests with HBV (skin tests, RAST, and specific IgG) before the challenge. Patients with a relapse of their allergy had, however, developed allergic SRs to IT injections more frequently than patients with lasting protection (p less than 0.001). SRs to the sting challenge (CH) after IT was stopped occurred more frequently in those patients in whom efficacy of IT had previously been confirmed by lacking responses to a field sting than in patients who had tolerated an intentional CH during the injection period (p less than 0.025). Indeed, the incidence of relapse after venom IT was stopped was only 9.6% in patients who had previously tolerated an intentional CH. It is concluded that well-tolerated HBV IT may be stopped after at least 3 years, provided its efficacy has been documented by a CH without SR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2005323     DOI: 10.1016/0091-6749(91)90392-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  10 in total

Review 1.  Does allergen immunotherapy alter the natural course of allergic disorders?

Authors:  X Yang
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  [Diagnosis and treatment of insect venom allergy. An important allergic issue for the ear, nose and throat specialist].

Authors:  O Pfaar; L Klimek; I Hansen; B A Stuck; K Hörmann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [Sting challenge: indications and execution].

Authors:  F Ruëff; B Przybilla
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 4.  [Insect venom allergies : Update 2016 for otorhinolaryngologists].

Authors:  L Klimek; N Dippold; A Sperl
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 5.  Insect sting anaphylaxis.

Authors:  David B K Golden
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 6.  Insect sting allergy: a model for immediate hypersensitivity reactions.

Authors:  R E Reisman
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  1993

7.  Single venom-based immunotherapy effectively protects patients with double positive tests to honey bee and Vespula venom.

Authors:  Johanna Stoevesandt; Bernd Hofmann; Johannes Hain; Andreas Kerstan; Axel Trautmann
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 3.406

8.  Benefits and limitations of sting challenge in hymenoptera venom allergy.

Authors:  Katharina Aßmus; Markus Meissner; Roland Kaufmann; Eva Maria Valesky
Journal:  Allergol Select       Date:  2021-01-18

Review 9.  [Venom immunotherapy. Side effects and efficacy of treatment].

Authors:  F Ruëff; B Przybilla
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.198

Review 10.  Hymenoptera Venom Allergy: How Does Venom Immunotherapy Prevent Anaphylaxis From Bee and Wasp Stings?

Authors:  Umit Murat Sahiner; Stephen R Durham
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 7.561

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.