BACKGROUND: The authors prospectively evaluated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters quantifying heterogeneous perfusion pattern and residual tumor volume early during treatment in cervical cancer, and compared their predictive power for primary tumor recurrence and cancer death with the standard clinical prognostic factors. A novel approach of augmenting the predictive power of clinical prognostic factors with MRI parameters was assessed. METHODS: Sixty-two cervical cancer patients underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI before and during early radiation/chemotherapy (2-2.5 weeks into treatment). Heterogeneous tumor perfusion was analyzed by signal intensity (SI) of each tumor voxel. Poorly perfused tumor regions were quantified as lower 10th percentile of SI (SI[10%]). DCE-MRI and 3-dimensional (3D) tumor volumetry MRI parameters were assessed as predictors of recurrence and cancer death (median follow-up, 4.1 years). Their discriminating capacity was compared with clinical prognostic factors (stage, lymph node status, histology) using sensitivity/specificity and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: SI(10%) and 3D volume 2-2.5 weeks into therapy independently predicted disease recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 2.6; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.0-6.5 [P = .04] and HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.5 [P = .03], respectively) and death (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.0-3.5 [P = .03] and HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-2.9 [P = .01], respectively), and were superior to clinical prognostic factors. The addition of MRI parameters to clinical prognostic factors increased sensitivity and specificity of clinical prognostic factors from 71% and 51%, respectively, to 100% and 71%, respectively, for predicting recurrence, and from 79% and 54%, respectively, to 93% and 60%, respectively, for predicting death. CONCLUSIONS: MRI parameters reflecting heterogeneous tumor perfusion and subtle tumor volume change early during radiation/chemotherapy are independent and better predictors of tumor recurrence and death than clinical prognostic factors. The combination of clinical prognostic factors and MRI parameters further improves early prediction of treatment failure and may enable a window of opportunity to alter treatment strategy.
BACKGROUND: The authors prospectively evaluated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters quantifying heterogeneous perfusion pattern and residual tumor volume early during treatment in cervical cancer, and compared their predictive power for primary tumor recurrence and cancer death with the standard clinical prognostic factors. A novel approach of augmenting the predictive power of clinical prognostic factors with MRI parameters was assessed. METHODS: Sixty-two cervical cancerpatients underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI before and during early radiation/chemotherapy (2-2.5 weeks into treatment). Heterogeneous tumor perfusion was analyzed by signal intensity (SI) of each tumor voxel. Poorly perfused tumor regions were quantified as lower 10th percentile of SI (SI[10%]). DCE-MRI and 3-dimensional (3D) tumor volumetry MRI parameters were assessed as predictors of recurrence and cancer death (median follow-up, 4.1 years). Their discriminating capacity was compared with clinical prognostic factors (stage, lymph node status, histology) using sensitivity/specificity and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS:SI(10%) and 3D volume 2-2.5 weeks into therapy independently predicted disease recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 2.6; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.0-6.5 [P = .04] and HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.5 [P = .03], respectively) and death (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.0-3.5 [P = .03] and HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-2.9 [P = .01], respectively), and were superior to clinical prognostic factors. The addition of MRI parameters to clinical prognostic factors increased sensitivity and specificity of clinical prognostic factors from 71% and 51%, respectively, to 100% and 71%, respectively, for predicting recurrence, and from 79% and 54%, respectively, to 93% and 60%, respectively, for predicting death. CONCLUSIONS: MRI parameters reflecting heterogeneous tumor perfusion and subtle tumor volume change early during radiation/chemotherapy are independent and better predictors of tumor recurrence and death than clinical prognostic factors. The combination of clinical prognostic factors and MRI parameters further improves early prediction of treatment failure and may enable a window of opportunity to alter treatment strategy.
Authors: N A Mayr; W T Yuh; J Zheng; J C Ehrhardt; J I Sorosky; V A Magnotta; R E Pelsang; D H Hussey Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1997-09-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: H C Wagenaar; J B Trimbos; S Postema; A Anastasopoulou; R J van der Geest; J H Reiber; G G Kenter; A A Peters; P M Pattynama Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: E Kastritis; A Bamias; E Efstathiou; D Gika; G Bozas; P Zorzou; K Sarris; C Papadimitriou; M A Dimopoulos Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2005-07-26 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: N A Mayr; W T Yuh; V A Magnotta; J C Ehrhardt; J A Wheeler; J I Sorosky; C S Davis; B C Wen; D D Martin; R E Pelsang; R E Buller; L W Oberley; D E Mellenberg; D H Hussey Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1996-10-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Nina A Mayr; Zhibin Huang; Jian Z Wang; Simon S Lo; Joline M Fan; John C Grecula; Steffen Sammet; Christina L Sammet; Guang Jia; Jun Zhang; Michael V Knopp; William T C Yuh Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-12-28 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Benjamin Lemasson; Thomas L Chenevert; Theodore S Lawrence; Christina Tsien; Pia C Sundgren; Charles R Meyer; Larry Junck; Jennifer Boes; Stefanie Galbán; Timothy D Johnson; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross; Craig J Galbán Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2013-12-01 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Zhibin Huang; Kevin A Yuh; Simon S Lo; John C Grecula; Steffen Sammet; Christina L Sammet; Guang Jia; Michael V Knopp; Qiang Wu; Norman J Beauchamp; William T C Yuh; Roy Wang; Nina A Mayr Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2014-08-29 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Meng Xu-Welliver; William T C Yuh; Julia R Fielding; Katarzyna J Macura; Zhibin Huang; Ahmet S Ayan; Floor J Backes; Guang Jia; Mariam Moshiri; Jun Zhang; Nina A Mayr Journal: Radiographics Date: 2014 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Chong Duan; Jesper F Kallehauge; G Larry Bretthorst; Kari Tanderup; Joseph J H Ackerman; Joel R Garbow Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-03-04 Impact factor: 4.668