Literature DB >> 25179141

Validation of optimal DCE-MRI perfusion threshold to classify at-risk tumor imaging voxels in heterogeneous cervical cancer for outcome prediction.

Zhibin Huang1, Kevin A Yuh1, Simon S Lo2, John C Grecula3, Steffen Sammet4, Christina L Sammet5, Guang Jia6, Michael V Knopp7, Qiang Wu8, Norman J Beauchamp9, William T C Yuh10, Roy Wang3, Nina A Mayr11.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To classify tumor imaging voxels at-risk for treatment failure within the heterogeneous cervical cancer using DCE MRI and determine optimal voxel's DCE threshold values at different treatment time points for early prediction of treatment failure. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: DCE-MRI from 102 patients with stage IB2-IVB cervical cancer was obtained at 3 different treatment time points: before (MRI 1) and during treatment (MRI 2 at 2-2.5 weeks and MRI 3 at 4-5 weeks). For each tumor voxel, the plateau signal intensity (SI) was derived from its time-SI curve from the DCE MRI. The optimal SI thresholds to classify the at-risk tumor voxels was determined by the maximal area under the curve using ROC analysis when varies SI value from 1.0 to 3.0 and correlates with treatment outcome.
RESULTS: The optimal SI thresholds for MRI 1, 2 and 3 were 2.2, 2.2 and 2.1 for significant differentiation between local recurrence/control, respectively, and 1.8, 2.1 and 2.2 for death/survival, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Optimal SI thresholds are clinically validated to quantify at-risk tumor voxels which vary with time. A single universal threshold (SI=1.9) was identified for all 3 treatment time points and remained significant for the early prediction of treatment failure.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Image analysis; Microcirculation; Perfusion imaging; Radiation therapy; Resistant tumor cell

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25179141      PMCID: PMC4348016          DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.08.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  37 in total

1.  Contrast enhanced dynamic MRI of cervical carcinoma during radiotherapy: early prediction of tumour regression rate.

Authors:  Q Y Gong; J N Brunt; C S Romaniuk; J P Oakley; L T Tan; N Roberts; G H Whitehouse; B Jones
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Heterogeneity in tumor microvascular response to radiation.

Authors:  M W Dewhirst; R Oliver; C Y Tso; C Gustafson; T Secomb; J F Gross
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 3.  MR microcirculation assessment in cervical cancer: correlations with histomorphological tumor markers and clinical outcome.

Authors:  N A Mayr; H Hawighorst; W T Yuh; M Essig; V A Magnotta; M V Knopp
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  The staging of cervical cancer: inevitable discrepancies between clinical staging and pathologic findinges.

Authors:  J R Van Nagell; J W Roddick; D M Lowin
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1971-08-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  The outcome of advanced or recurrent non-squamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix after platinum-based combination chemotherapy.

Authors:  E Kastritis; A Bamias; E Efstathiou; D Gika; G Bozas; P Zorzou; K Sarris; C Papadimitriou; M A Dimopoulos
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2005-07-26       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Tumor perfusion studies using fast magnetic resonance imaging technique in advanced cervical cancer: a new noninvasive predictive assay.

Authors:  N A Mayr; W T Yuh; V A Magnotta; J C Ehrhardt; J A Wheeler; J I Sorosky; C S Davis; B C Wen; D D Martin; R E Pelsang; R E Buller; L W Oberley; D E Mellenberg; D H Hussey
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  The influence of tumor size and morphology on the outcome of patients with FIGO stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  P J Eifel; M Morris; J T Wharton; M J Oswald
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1994-04-30       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Intratumoral pO2 predicts survival in advanced cancer of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  M Höckel; C Knoop; K Schlenger; B Vorndran; E Baussmann; M Mitze; P G Knapstein; P Vaupel
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Functional diffusion map as an early imaging biomarker for high-grade glioma: correlation with conventional radiologic response and overall survival.

Authors:  Daniel A Hamstra; Craig J Galbán; Charles R Meyer; Timothy D Johnson; Pia C Sundgren; Christina Tsien; Theodore S Lawrence; Larry Junck; David J Ross; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross; Thomas L Chenevert
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Intratumoral heterogeneity as a confounding factor in clonogenic assays for tumour radioresponsiveness.

Authors:  R A Britten; A J Evans; M J Allalunis-Turner; A J Franko; R G Pearcey
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 6.280

View more
  4 in total

1.  Tumor radiomic heterogeneity: Multiparametric functional imaging to characterize variability and predict response following cervical cancer radiation therapy.

Authors:  Stephen R Bowen; William T C Yuh; Daniel S Hippe; Wei Wu; Savannah C Partridge; Saba Elias; Guang Jia; Zhibin Huang; George A Sandison; Dennis Nelson; Michael V Knopp; Simon S Lo; Paul E Kinahan; Nina A Mayr
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Artificial Intelligence and Radiomics in Head and Neck Cancer Care: Opportunities, Mechanics, and Challenges.

Authors:  Lisanne V van Dijk; Clifton D Fuller
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2021-03

Review 3.  The value of advanced MRI techniques in the assessment of cervical cancer: a review.

Authors:  Evelyn Dappa; Tania Elger; Annette Hasenburg; Christoph Düber; Marco J Battista; Andreas M Hötker
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2017-08-21

Review 4.  A practical review of magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation and management of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Emma C Fields; Elisabeth Weiss
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.481

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.