Literature DB >> 20050743

Comparison of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and pulsed electromagnetic field treatments on OPG and RANKL expression in human osteoblast-like cells.

Manon A Borsje1, Yijin Ren, H Willy de Haan-Visser, Roel Kuijer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare two clinically applied treatments to stimulate bone healing-low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) and pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF)-for their effects on RANKL and OPG expression in osteoblast-like cells in vitro.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: LIPUS or PEMF was applied to Saos-2 cells for 10 minutes or 3 hours. RANKL and OPG expressions were analyzed at 0, 4, 8, or 12 hours after treatment with real-time PCR. Secreted protein levels in culture supernatant were analyzed at the same posttreatment time points using specific ELISA assays.
RESULTS: Neither LIPUS nor PEMF had an effect on RANKL protein expression. OPG protein was significantly increased by LIPUS after 0 and 4 hours (brief short-term effect) and was increased almost 2.5-fold by PEMF after 8 hours. The mRNA levels of OPG and RANKL were hardly affected by LIPUS treatment at any time point. PEMF induced a fivefold increase in RANKL mRNA expression at t = 0. A brief PEMF treatment of 10 minutes resulted in downregulation of RANKL expression after 0 and 4 hours and upregulation at 12 hours. OPG mRNA was downregulated after 8 hours.
CONCLUSION: The effects of LIPUS or PEMF expression on OPG and RANKL are limited. From our experiments, it seems that LIPUS treatment resulted in a quick protein response, while the response of cells to PEMF (3 hours) was delayed. The increase in OPG protein at 8 hours post PEMF treatment is indicative of reduction of osteolysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20050743      PMCID: PMC8985733          DOI: 10.2319/060809-318.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  20 in total

1.  Pulsed electromagnetic field treatments enhance the healing of fibular osteotomies.

Authors:  Ronald J Midura; Michael O Ibiwoye; Kimerly A Powell; Yoshitada Sakai; Todd Doehring; Mark D Grabiner; Thomas E Patterson; Maciej Zborowski; Alan Wolfman
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on bone formation and bone loss during limb lengthening.

Authors:  K S Eyres; M Saleh; J A Kanis
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  The enhancement of bone regeneration by ultrasound.

Authors:  Lutz Claes; Bettina Willie
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 4.  RANKL-RANK signaling in osteoclastogenesis and bone disease.

Authors:  Teiji Wada; Tomoki Nakashima; Nishina Hiroshi; Josef M Penninger
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 11.951

Review 5.  Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for bone healing: an overview.

Authors:  Konstantinos N Malizos; Michael E Hantes; Vassilios Protopappas; Athanasios Papachristos
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Cementoblast response to low- and high-intensity ultrasound.

Authors:  Diego Araujo Dalla-Bona; Eiji Tanaka; Toshihiro Inubushi; Hiroko Oka; Atsumi Ohta; Haruhisa Okada; Mutsumi Miyauchi; Takashi Takata; Kazuo Tanne
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 2.633

7.  Osteoprotegerin (OPG) production by cells in the osteoblast lineage is regulated by pulsed electromagnetic fields in cultures grown on calcium phosphate substrates.

Authors:  Zvi Schwartz; Maya Fisher; Christoph H Lohmann; Bruce J Simon; Barbara D Boyan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Effect of donor age on the growth in vitro of cells obtained from human trabecular bone.

Authors:  C E Evans; C S Galasko; C Ward
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Effect of pulse-burst electromagnetic field stimulation on osteoblast cell activities.

Authors:  Walter Hong-Shong Chang; Li-Ting Chen; Jui-Sheng Sun; Feng-Huei Lin
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.010

10.  Therapeutic ultrasound to stimulate osteoconduction; A placebo controlled single blind study using e-PTFE membranes in rats.

Authors:  Jurjen Schortinghuis; Jan L Ruben; Gerry M Raghoebar; Boudewijn Stegenga
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.633

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Pulsed electromagnetic fields: promising treatment for osteoporosis.

Authors:  T Wang; L Yang; J Jiang; Y Liu; Z Fan; C Zhong; C He
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Pulsed electromagnetic fields increased the anti-inflammatory effect of A₂A and A₃ adenosine receptors in human T/C-28a2 chondrocytes and hFOB 1.19 osteoblasts.

Authors:  Fabrizio Vincenzi; Martina Targa; Carmen Corciulo; Stefania Gessi; Stefania Merighi; Stefania Setti; Ruggero Cadossi; Mary B Goldring; Pier Andrea Borea; Katia Varani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates tooth movement via activation of the BMP-2 signaling pathway.

Authors:  Hui Xue; Jun Zheng; Ziping Cui; Xiufeng Bai; Gang Li; Caidi Zhang; Sanhu He; Weihong Li; Shayanne A Lajud; Yinzhong Duan; Hong Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Translational Insights into Extremely Low Frequency Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (ELF-PEMFs) for Bone Regeneration after Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery.

Authors:  Sabrina Ehnert; Steffen Schröter; Romina H Aspera-Werz; Wiebke Eisler; Karsten Falldorf; Michael Ronniger; Andreas K Nussler
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.