Literature DB >> 19139991

Osteoprotegerin (OPG) production by cells in the osteoblast lineage is regulated by pulsed electromagnetic fields in cultures grown on calcium phosphate substrates.

Zvi Schwartz1, Maya Fisher, Christoph H Lohmann, Bruce J Simon, Barbara D Boyan.   

Abstract

Pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) used clinically to stimulate bone formation enhance the osteogenic effects of BMP-2 on human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) if the MSCs are grown in osteogenic medium and are cultured on calcium phosphate (CaP) surfaces rather than tissue culture polystyrene plastic (TCPS). This study tested if PEMF's effects on cells in the osteoblast lineage are substrate dependent and if factors produced by osteoblasts that regulate osteoclastic bone resorption, might also be regulated by PEMF. Human MSCs treated with BMP-2 and human osteoblast-like cells (normal human osteoblasts [NHOst cells], MG63 cells, SaOS-2 cells) were cultured on CaP or TCPS and their response to PEMF (4.5 ms bursts of 20 pulses repeating at 15 Hz for 8 h/day) determined as a function of decoy receptor osteoprotegerin (OPG) and RANK ligand (RANKL) production, both of which are associated with regulation of osteoclast differentiation. The results showed that when osteoblast-like cells were cultured on CaP, PEMF decreased cell number and increased production of paracrine factors associated with reduced bone resorption like OPG. RANKL was unaffected, indicating that the OPG/RANKL ratio was increased, further supporting a surface-dependent osteogenic effect of PEMF. Moreover, effects of estrogen were surface dependent and enhanced by PEMF, demonstrating that PEMF can modulate osteogenic responses to anabolic regulators of osteoblast function. These effects of PEMF would not be evident in models examining cells in traditional culture on plastic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19139991     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-008-9628-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  12 in total

1.  Electrical polarization of titanium surfaces for the enhancement of osteoblast differentiation.

Authors:  Rolando A Gittens; Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Robert Rettew; Robert J Butera; Faisal M Alamgir; Barbara D Boyan; Zvi Schwartz
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.010

2.  Combined effects of electromagnetic field and low-level laser increase proliferation and alter the morphology of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Jasmin Nurković; Ivan Zaletel; Selmina Nurković; Šefćet Hajrović; Fahrudin Mustafić; Jovan Isma; Aleksandra Jurišić Škevin; Vesna Grbović; Milica Kovačević Filipović; Zana Dolićanin
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 3.  Electrical implications of corrosion for osseointegration of titanium implants.

Authors:  R A Gittens; R Olivares-Navarrete; R Tannenbaum; B D Boyan; Z Schwartz
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Pulsed electromagnetic fields increased the anti-inflammatory effect of A₂A and A₃ adenosine receptors in human T/C-28a2 chondrocytes and hFOB 1.19 osteoblasts.

Authors:  Fabrizio Vincenzi; Martina Targa; Carmen Corciulo; Stefania Gessi; Stefania Merighi; Stefania Setti; Ruggero Cadossi; Mary B Goldring; Pier Andrea Borea; Katia Varani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The influence of electromagnetic radiation generated by a mobile phone on the skeletal system of rats.

Authors:  Karolina Sieroń-Stołtny; Łukasz Teister; Grzegorz Cieślar; Dominik Sieroń; Zbigniew Śliwinski; Marek Kucharzewski; Aleksander Sieroń
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  The effect of low-frequency electromagnetic field on human bone marrow stem/progenitor cell differentiation.

Authors:  Christina L Ross; Mevan Siriwardane; Graça Almeida-Porada; Christopher D Porada; Peter Brink; George J Christ; Benjamin S Harrison
Journal:  Stem Cell Res       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.020

Review 7.  How electromagnetic fields can influence adult stem cells: positive and negative impacts.

Authors:  Aleksandra Maziarz; Beata Kocan; Mariusz Bester; Sylwia Budzik; Marian Cholewa; Takahiro Ochiya; Agnieszka Banas
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 6.832

8.  Comparison of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and pulsed electromagnetic field treatments on OPG and RANKL expression in human osteoblast-like cells.

Authors:  Manon A Borsje; Yijin Ren; H Willy de Haan-Visser; Roel Kuijer
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  3D additive-manufactured nanocomposite magnetic scaffolds: Effect of the application mode of a time-dependent magnetic field on hMSCs behavior.

Authors:  Ugo D'Amora; Teresa Russo; Antonio Gloria; Virginia Rivieccio; Vincenzo D'Antò; Giacomo Negri; Luigi Ambrosio; Roberto De Santis
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2017-04-25

Review 10.  MiR200 and miR302: Two Big Families Influencing Stem Cell Behavior.

Authors:  Francesca Balzano; Sara Cruciani; Valentina Basoli; Sara Santaniello; Federica Facchin; Carlo Ventura; Margherita Maioli
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.