Literature DB >> 20050739

Improved lateral cephalometric superimposition using an automated image fitting technique.

Brent E Larson1, Matthew M Sievers, Ching-Chang Ko.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility of automated lateral cephalometric radiograph (LCR) superimposition using an image fitting algorithm.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using radiopaque markers, we identified seven cephalometric landmarks on three dry skulls, took digital LCRs on each in several rotated positions, and used a custom software program (XRay3D) to automatically superimpose each rotated image on the initial image using an anterior cranial base reference. We measured superimposition error at each landmark and adjusted image brightness levels to simulate potential fitting error due to exposure variation.
RESULTS: The greatest mean error for 24 image rotation trials of less than 10 degrees was less than 0.5 mm. Rotations of 10 degrees or more were not reliably superimposed. Errors of 0.2-1.6 mm occurred for +/-10% brightness but increased exponentially with further brightness alteration.
CONCLUSION: Automated superimposition of LCRs, using this fitting technique, has great potential when rotation is less than 10 degrees and brightness variation is less than 10%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20050739      PMCID: PMC8985725          DOI: 10.2319/042509-229.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  4 in total

1.  Effects of implant healing time on crestal bone loss of a controlled-load dental implant.

Authors:  C C Ko; W H Douglas; R DeLong; M D Rohrer; J Q Swift; J S Hodges; K-N An; E L Ritman
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  The reliability of head film measurements. 3. Tracing superimposition.

Authors:  S Baumrind; D Miller; R Molthen
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1976-12

3.  Comparison of hand-traced and computer-based cephalometric superimpositions.

Authors:  S S Huja; E L Grubaugh; A M Rummel; H W Fields; F M Beck
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Comparison of hand-traced and computerized cephalograms: landmark identification, measurement, and superimposition accuracy.

Authors:  Dustin Roden-Johnson; Jeryl English; Ronald Gallerano
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.650

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.