Literature DB >> 20049837

Additional value of EGFR downstream signaling phosphoprotein expression to KRAS status for response to anti-EGFR antibodies in colorectal cancer.

Geraldine Perkins1, Astrid Lièvre, Carole Ramacci, Tchao Méatchi, Aurélien de Reynies, Jean-François Emile, Valérie Boige, Gorana Tomasic, Jean-Baptiste Bachet, Fréderic Bibeau, Olivier Bouché, Frédérique Penault-Llorca, Jean-Louis Merlin, Pierre Laurent-Puig.   

Abstract

KRAS mutations are a strong predictive marker of resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) but only a subset of wild-type (WT) KRAS patients are responders, suggesting the existence of additional markers of resistance to this treatment. The activation of EGFR downstream signaling pathways may be one of these ones. In a series of 42 patients with advanced CRC treated with cetuximab/panitumumab, for whom KRAS status was previously determined, we retrospectively analyzed the intratumor expression of EGFR downstream signaling phosphoproteins of the RAS/MAPK and PI3K/AKT pathways (pERK1/2, pMEK1, pAKT, pP70S6K and pGSK3beta) using Bio-Plex phosphoprotein array. Association with tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed. The expression of all the phosphoproteins was higher in KRAS mutated tumors than in WT tumors. The expression of pP70S6K was lower in responders than in nonresponder patients. In univariate analysis, patients with high pMEK1 or pP70S6K expression had a shorter PFS than those with low expression. Patients with high pP70S6K expression also had a shorter OS. In multivariate analysis, PFS was shorter for patients with high pMEK1 or pP70S6K expression, independently of KRAS status, as OS for patients with high pP70S6K expression. Therefore, WT KRAS patients with high pP70S6K expression had a shorter survival than those with low expression. Our results suggest the importance of EGFR downstream signaling phosphoproteins expression in addition to KRAS status to define the subgroup of patients who will not benefit from anti-EGFR therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20049837     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  21 in total

1.  Combination of ATP-competitive mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors with standard chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Chloe E Atreya; Gregory S Ducker; Morris E Feldman; Emily K Bergsland; Robert S Warren; Kevan M Shokat
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Molecular spectrum of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, TP53, and APC somatic gene mutations in Arab patients with colorectal cancer: determination of frequency and distribution pattern.

Authors:  Humaid O Al-Shamsi; Jeremy Jones; Yazan Fahmawi; Ibrahim Dahbour; Aziz Tabash; Reham Abdel-Wahab; Ahmed O S Abousamra; Kenna R Shaw; Lianchun Xiao; Manal M Hassan; Benjamin R Kipp; Scott Kopetz; Amr S Soliman; Robert R McWilliams; Robert A Wolff
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-12

Review 3.  Panitumumab: a review of its use in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Disruption of actin filaments and suppression of pancreatic cancer cell viability and migration following treatment with polyisoprenylated cysteinyl amides.

Authors:  Augustine T Nkembo; Olufisayo Salako; Rosemary A Poku; Felix Amissah; Elizabeth Ntantie; Hernan Flores-Rozas; Nazarius S Lamango
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  Systematic review of pharmacogenetic testing for predicting clinical benefit to anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer S Lin; Elizabeth M Webber; Caitlyn A Senger; Rebecca S Holmes; Evelyn P Whitlock
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 6.166

6.  Repurposing EGFR Inhibitor Utility in Colorectal Cancer in Mutant APC and TP53 Subpopulations.

Authors:  Mingli Yang; Michael J Schell; Andrey Loboda; Michael Nebozhyn; Jiannong Li; Jamie K Teer; W Jack Pledger; Timothy J Yeatman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 7.  iPOP goes the world: integrated personalized Omics profiling and the road toward improved health care.

Authors:  Jennifer Li-Pook-Than; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2013-05-23

Review 8.  Biomarkers and anti-EGFR therapies for KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jose A García-Sáenz; Javier Sastre; Eduardo Díaz-Rubio García
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Molecular spectrum of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA gene mutation: determination of frequency, distribution pattern in Indian colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Swati Bisht; Firoz Ahmad; Satyakam Sawaimoon; Simi Bhatia; Bibhu Ranjan Das
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 10.  Application of molecular technologies for phosphoproteomic analysis of clinical samples.

Authors:  M Pierobon; J Wulfkuhle; L Liotta; E Petricoin
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.