Literature DB >> 20049793

Nanostructured polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

I O Smith1, X H Liu, L A Smith, P X Ma.   

Abstract

The structural features of tissue engineering scaffolds affect cell response and must be engineered to support cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation. The scaffold acts as an interim synthetic extracellular matrix (ECM) that cells interact with prior to forming a new tissue. In this review, bone tissue engineering is used as the primary example for the sake of brevity. We focus on nanofibrous scaffolds and the incorporation of other components including other nanofeatures into the scaffold structure. Since the ECM is comprised in large part of collagen fibers, between 50 and 500 nm in diameter, well-designed nanofibrous scaffolds mimic this structure. Our group has developed a novel thermally induced phase separation (TIPS) process in which a solution of biodegradable polymer is cast into a porous scaffold, resulting in a nanofibrous pore-wall structure. These nanoscale fibers have a diameter (50-500 nm) comparable to those collagen fibers found in the ECM. This process can then be combined with a porogen leaching technique, also developed by our group, to engineer an interconnected pore structure that promotes cell migration and tissue ingrowth in three dimensions. To improve upon efforts to incorporate a ceramic component into polymer scaffolds by mixing, our group has also developed a technique where apatite crystals are grown onto biodegradable polymer scaffolds by soaking them in simulated body fluid (SBF). By changing the polymer used, the concentration of ions in the SBF and by varying the treatment time, the size and distribution of these crystals are varied. Work is currently being done to improve the distribution of these crystals throughout three-dimensional scaffolds and to create nanoscale apatite deposits that better mimic those found in the ECM. In both nanofibrous and composite scaffolds, cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation improved when compared to control scaffolds. Additionally, composite scaffolds showed a decrease in incidence of apoptosis when compared to polymer control in bone tissue engineering. Nanoparticles have been integrated into the nanostructured scaffolds to deliver biologically active molecules such as growth and differentiation factors to regulate cell behavior for optimal tissue regeneration. (c) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20049793      PMCID: PMC2800311          DOI: 10.1002/wnan.26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol        ISSN: 1939-0041


  68 in total

1.  Engineering new bone tissue in vitro on highly porous poly(alpha-hydroxyl acids)/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds.

Authors:  P X Ma; R Zhang; G Xiao; R Franceschi
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2001-02

2.  Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics.

Authors:  T J Webster; C Ergun; R H Doremus; R W Siegel; R Bizios
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Accelerated bonelike apatite growth on porous polymer/ceramic composite scaffolds in vitro.

Authors:  Sang-Soo Kim; Min Sun Park; So-Jung Gwak; Cha Yong Choi; Byung-Soo Kim
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2006-10

4.  Infections and human tissue transplants: review of FDA MedWatch reports 2001-2004.

Authors:  Su Wang; Craig Zinderman; Robert Wise; Miles Braun
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2007-02-03       Impact factor: 1.522

5.  Synthetic nano-fibrillar extracellular matrices with predesigned macroporous architectures.

Authors:  R Zhang; P X Ma
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000-11

6.  Biomedical nanocomposites of hydroxyapatite/polycaprolactone obtained by surfactant mediation.

Authors:  Hae-Won Kim
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.396

7.  3-D Nanofibrous electrospun multilayered construct is an alternative ECM mimicking scaffold.

Authors:  S Srouji; T Kizhner; E Suss-Tobi; E Livne; E Zussman
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Effect of filler surface morphology on the impact behaviour of hydroxyapatite reinforced high density polyethylene composites.

Authors:  Y Zhang; K E Tanner
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Bone regeneration on a collagen sponge self-assembled peptide-amphiphile nanofiber hybrid scaffold.

Authors:  Hossein Hosseinkhani; Mohsen Hosseinkhani; Furong Tian; Hisatoshi Kobayashi; Yasuhiko Tabata
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2007-01

10.  MC3T3-E1 osteoblast attachment and proliferation on porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds fabricated with nanophase powder.

Authors:  Ian O Smith; Laura R McCabe; Melissa J Baumann
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2006
View more
  49 in total

Review 1.  Regenerative nanomedicines: an emerging investment prospective?

Authors:  Catherine Prescott
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  The extracellular matrix at a glance.

Authors:  Christian Frantz; Kathleen M Stewart; Valerie M Weaver
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  Biomimetic polyurethane/TiO2 nanocomposite scaffolds capable of promoting biomineralization and mesenchymal stem cell proliferation.

Authors:  Qingxia Zhu; Xiaofei Li; Zhaobo Fan; Yanyi Xu; Hong Niu; Chao Li; Yu Dang; Zheng Huang; Yun Wang; Jianjun Guan
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 7.328

Review 4.  Biomaterials to prevascularize engineered tissues.

Authors:  Lei Tian; Steven C George
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Osteogenic Differentiation and Mineralization on Compact Multilayer nHA-PCL Electrospun Scaffolds in a Perfusion Bioreactor.

Authors:  Maliheh Yaghoobi; Sameereh Hashemi-Najafabadi; Masoud Soleimani; Ebrahim Vasheghani-Farahani; Seyyed Mohammad Mousavi
Journal:  Iran J Biotechnol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 6.  Scaffolds and cells for tissue regeneration: different scaffold pore sizes-different cell effects.

Authors:  Ieva Bružauskaitė; Daiva Bironaitė; Edvardas Bagdonas; Eiva Bernotienė
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.058

7.  Fabrication of a multi-layer three-dimensional scaffold with controlled porous micro-architecture for application in small intestine tissue engineering.

Authors:  Toyin Knight; Joydeep Basu; Elias A Rivera; Thomas Spencer; Deepak Jain; Richard Payne
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Effect of surfactant types on the biocompatibility of electrospun HAp/PHBV composite nanofibers.

Authors:  A Suslu; A Z Albayrak; A S Urkmez; E Bayir; U Cocen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Regeneration of uterine horns in rats using collagen scaffolds loaded with human embryonic stem cell-derived endometrium-like cells.

Authors:  Tianran Song; Xia Zhao; Haixiang Sun; Xin'an Li; Nacheng Lin; Lijun Ding; Jianwu Dai; Yali Hu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Effect of 3D-scaffold formation on differentiation and survival in human neural progenitor cells.

Authors:  Stefanie Ortinau; Jürgen Schmich; Stephan Block; Andrea Liedmann; Ludwig Jonas; Dieter G Weiss; Christiane A Helm; Arndt Rolfs; Moritz J Frech
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.