Literature DB >> 20049349

Acetabular component revision in total hip arthroplasty. Part II: management of major bone loss and pelvic discontinuity.

Paul S Issack1, Markku Nousiainen, Burak Beksac, David L Helfet, Thomas P Sculco, Robert L Buly.   

Abstract

Use of structural bone graft and/or reconstruction cage devices in acetabular revisions with major bone loss has the advantages of providing a stable construct at the anatomical hip center of rotation and, theoretically, reconstituting bone stock. When the structural graft supports more than 50% of the acetabular component, a reconstruction cage device spanning ilium to ischium should be used to protect the graft and provide structural stability. Recent introduction of trabecular metal cups and augments and custom triflanged acetabular components has increased the potential for biological fixation and long-term stability of revision constructs. Longer follow-up of these reconstructions is needed. Revisions with pelvic discontinuity and major bone loss have a high failure rate and require techniques either to reduce and plate the discontinuity or to distract the discontinuity to achieve long-term stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20049349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)        ISSN: 1078-4519


  13 in total

Review 1.  [What can be done when hip prostheses fail? : New trends in revision endoprosthetics].

Authors:  S Gravius; T Randau; D C Wirtz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Management of Paprosky type three B acetabular defects by custom-made components: early results.

Authors:  Alessandro Aprato; Matteo Giachino; Paolo Bedino; Danilo Mellano; Raimondo Piana; Alessandro Massè
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Shape suitability and mechanical safety of customised hip implants: Three-dimensional printed acetabular cup for hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yeokyung Kang; Doo-Hoon Sun; Jong-Chul Park; Jungsung Kim
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-27

4.  [Bone defect adjusted strategy in revision arthroplasty of the hip : Wich implant in wich situation? Innovations and approved methods].

Authors:  B S Craiovan; J Grifka; A Keshmiri; B Moser; M Wörner; T Renkawitz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Treatment of large acetabular defects: a surgical technique utilizing impaction grafting into a metallic mesh.

Authors:  Johannes Buckup; Emiliano Alvarez Salinas; Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle; Friedrich Boettner
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-08-15

6.  Effects of hydroxyapatite coating of cups used in hip revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stergios Lazarinis; Johan Kärrholm; Nils P Hailer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Metallosis and elevated serum levels of tantalum following failed revision hip arthroplasty--a case report.

Authors:  George C Babis; Nikolaos A Stavropoulos; Gregory Sasalos; Maria Ochsenkuehn-Petropoulou; Panagiotis Megas
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Acetabular Reconstruction in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Won Yong Shon; Siva Swaminathan Santhanam; Jung Woo Choi
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-03-31

9.  Effects of Titanium Mesh Surfaces-Coated with Hydroxyapatite/β-Tricalcium Phosphate Nanotubes on Acetabular Bone Defects in Rabbits.

Authors:  Thuy-Duong Thi Nguyen; Tae-Sung Bae; Dae-Hyeok Yang; Myung-Sik Park; Sun-Jung Yoon
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Acetabular Cup Revision Arthroplasty Using Morselized Impaction Allograft.

Authors:  Joong-Myung Lee; Tae-Ho Kim
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2018-06-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.